Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu New Nuclear Plants Status honeypot

Author Topic: New Nuclear Plants Status  (Read 139587 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Content1

  • Guest
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #100 on: May 27, 2015, 02:06 »
That is the beauty of capitalism.  People come and go, but if the demand for workers go up and pay is raised to attract people, they will come.  The machine will keep running even if not with the current bunch of workers.

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5490
  • Karma: 2523
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #101 on: Jul 03, 2015, 09:28 »

Not to mention the Final Rules due in 2016 which may give any business pause w...hen being served notice they have a 300 year liability:

...The staff considers a timeframe of up to 300 years of storage to be appropriate for
characterization and prediction of aging effects and aging management issues for EST. The
staff may adjust this analytical period based on the expanded gap assessment results, expected
in 2012, which will identify technical and regulatory needs to support the development of an EST
framework and WC update...


http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1102/ML110260244.pdf

Where the years 1991 - 2000 were decline, and 2001 - 2008 were stagnant, the years 2009 - 2016 are nails in the coffin,...

No Renaissance, more like life support with progressive euthanasia already planned and in the books,...

I'm just saying,... [coffee]

and yet, the patient keeps fighting for breath:

Holtec Partners with ELEA, LLC in New Mexico to Build Consolidated Interim Storage Facility

http://www.holtecinternational.com/2015/04/holtec-partners-with-elea-llc-in-new-mexico-to-build-consolidated-interim-storage-facility/

New Mexico Joins Race to Build Storage for Nuclear Waste

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/29/new-mexico-joins-race-to-build-storage-for-nuclear/?page=all

...Holtec officials say the company expects to apply for a permit from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission within a year. State permits would also be required. Licensing could take three years.

“It’s a tough road to get any nuclear project off the ground, otherwise we would have repositories and interim storage facilities all over the country,” Heaton said. “We have great partners and the will to get it done.”....


seems Skull Valley started a similar process in 1998, only to have the coffin nails driven home in 2012,...

http://www.beyondnuclear.org/home/2012/12/22/pfs-pulls-the-plug-on-parking-lot-dump-targeted-at-skull-val.html

watch and see, watch and see,... [coffee]
« Last Edit: Jul 03, 2015, 09:29 by GLW »

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

HeavyD

  • Guest
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #102 on: Jul 24, 2015, 09:55 »

Offline Rennhack

  • Forum Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 8995
  • Karma: 4683
  • Gender: Male
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #103 on: Jul 24, 2015, 10:32 »

Offline SloGlo

  • meter reader
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 5827
  • Karma: 2646
  • Gender: Male
  • trust me, i'm an hp
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #104 on: Jul 24, 2015, 02:49 »
this vid makes it look sew easy!  8)
quando omni flunkus moritati

dubble eye, dubble yew, dubble aye!

dew the best ya kin, wit watt ya have, ware yinze are!

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5490
  • Karma: 2523
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #105 on: Oct 22, 2015, 11:33 »
So, I'm gonna post this in three places because something has happened which has not happened since nukeworker.com was launched on the internet,...

An operating license has been granted to a commercial nuclear power plant in the US of A.

So, here's a quick set of numbers to let sink in,....

Licensed and Shuttered Synopsis                  
                  
Licensed in 1950's      3       Shuttered in 1950's   0      
Licensed in 1960's      19      Shuttered in 1960's   7      
Licensed in 1970's      59      Shuttered in 1970's   7      
Licensed in 1980's      47      Shuttered in 1980's   6      
Licensed in 1990's      5       Shuttered in 1990's   9      
Licensed in 2000's      0       Shuttered in 2000's   0      
Licensed in 2010's      1       Shuttered in 2010's   5   

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"


Offline Rennhack

  • Forum Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 8995
  • Karma: 4683
  • Gender: Male
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #107 on: Apr 29, 2016, 09:34 »
$19 billion?  Seems dubious.

Offline hamsamich

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1454
  • Karma: 1358
  • Gender: Male
  • And did I hear a 9er in there?
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #108 on: Apr 29, 2016, 11:05 »
yeah but they are spending quite a bit of money to set up the possibility, not the 19 billion, but the hundreds of millions to even investigate.

HeavyD

  • Guest
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #109 on: Aug 31, 2016, 10:22 »
Latest milestone

&index=1

HeavyD

  • Guest
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #110 on: Aug 31, 2016, 10:25 »

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17047
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #111 on: Aug 31, 2016, 11:20 »
Photo album for the project

https://www.flickr.com/photos/scegnews/sets/72157629244341909/

That's a lot of pictures, thanks. There a few interesting complicated crane lifts that would give DOE reps ulcers. I watched a demolition that cut a large utility bridge away from an active building attached to the demo. When the final cut was done I did not see it move until the crane lifted it away, pretty amazing The DOE facility rep was expecting the worst and was visibly nervous until the lift started.

Offline Rennhack

  • Forum Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 8995
  • Karma: 4683
  • Gender: Male
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #112 on: Aug 31, 2016, 09:51 »

HeavyD

  • Guest
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #113 on: Dec 19, 2016, 12:43 »
Latest video from our project.

&feature=youtu.be

Offline MrHazmat

  • Principal Hazardous Material Specialist - DOE
  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
  • Karma: 136
  • Gender: Male
  • DragRacing Ain't Nothing Like It!!!!!!
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #114 on: Dec 20, 2016, 07:04 »
My oldest son is a crane operator there, he wants to learn to run the Big one so bad !!!!! ;D
Keeping our highways safe for over 40 years

Offline Ksheed

  • Very Lite User
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: 0
  • Gender: Male
  • Tell Recruiters to use NukeWorker.com
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #115 on: Jun 15, 2017, 03:52 »
Status as I understand it:


Vogtle 3 & 4 - Issued 2/10/2012 - Under construction


Summer 2 & 3 - Issued 3/30/2012 - Under construction CANCELED


Fermi 3 - Issued 5/1/2015 - No timeline for construction


STP 3 & 4 - Issued 2/12/2016 - No timeline for construction


Levy 1 & 2 - Issued 10/26/2016 - No timeline for construction


Lee 1& 2 - Issued 12/19/2016 - No timeline for construction


North Anna 3 - Issued 5/31/2017 - No timeline for construction


Turkey Point 6 & 7 - Under review - only license still under review
« Last Edit: Dec 14, 2017, 04:30 by ksheed12 »

Offline hamsamich

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1454
  • Karma: 1358
  • Gender: Male
  • And did I hear a 9er in there?
Re: New Nuclear Plants Status
« Reply #116 on: Jul 28, 2019, 02:04 »
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-28/eastern-europe-s-love-affair-with-nuclear-is-hitting-the-rocks

not a U.S. snapshot, but fairly balanced article of nuclear power in Eastern Europe...expensive, but still in their hearts.  some updates as well of how far along new reactors are in different countries.

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?