Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu new carrier

Author Topic: new carrier  (Read 3889 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jwcj8513

  • Guest
new carrier
« on: Jan 28, 2008, 01:19 »
Any one know anything about the new carrier called the george bush? i believe it is going to be deployed this year or next. does anyone know if it will be east coast or west coast?

Offline RDTroja

  • Site Heretic
  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4015
  • Karma: 4558
  • Gender: Male
  • I knew I got into IT for a reason!
Re: new carrier
« Reply #1 on: Jan 28, 2008, 01:21 »
This sounds like a setup for DaveWarren... let the vitriol fly.
"I won't eat anything that has intelligent life, but I'd gladly eat a network executive or a politician."

                                  -Marty Feldman

"Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to understand that it bears a very close resemblance to the first."
                                  -Ronald Reagan

I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it.

                                  - Voltaire

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17130
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: new carrier
« Reply #2 on: Jan 28, 2008, 02:29 »
It is far enough along that they are testing the catapult, it was on the news the other day.

taterhead

  • Guest
Re: new carrier
« Reply #3 on: Jan 28, 2008, 02:55 »
yes,...

http://www.nn.northropgrumman.com/bush/

delivers 2008

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/batgru-77.htm

commissions 2009

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_George_H._W._Bush

no,...

that took 57 seconds,.....thread closed!,.....NEXT!!!!!

(we should get certified in spoonfeeding around here for krissakes!!!!)


I have it from a friend in the know that they are trying to move commissioning up to 2008 so that GWB can actually commission the ship that bears his dad's name while still in office.

Of course, the ship won't be ready, so it would be towed to Norfolk, commissioned, and towed back.

Also, it is an projected to be an East Coast asset, and many are speculating that Mayport might get it to replace the JFK once all the upgrades and such are made to the facilities there.
« Last Edit: Jan 28, 2008, 03:52 by taterhead »

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?