Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Non Judicial Punishment honeypot

Author Topic: Non Judicial Punishment  (Read 43489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

theldron

  • Guest
Non Judicial Punishment
« on: Jan 29, 2008, 07:52 »
Recently (August 28th, 2007; Cleared on September 7th) I was punished at Captain's Mast for reasons involving another shipmate, but is behind me in all actions. My evaluation upon completing A school was 3.0 all the way across. I can get no definite answers about anything concerning the rest of my career. The instructions are varied and in different places. I am particularly interested in Advancing and for Star Reenlistment. I know my advancement to E-3 depends on TIR. Which should be on June 7th, 2008 (9 Months). Does this mean that my TIR  for E-4 starts on June 7th? When does my counter start for STAR reenlistment? Am I still eligible for any programs? Is there anyway to recover in the eyes of a training command? Any help at all would be greatly appreciated.

Offline thenukeman

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1939
  • Karma: 1964
  • Elements Rule Battle , Elementis Regamus Proleium
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #1 on: Jan 29, 2008, 08:21 »
When I was an Officer I gave out Article 15's (ARMY) if you had money taken away the punishment was permanent record, if not it stayed in the file until you left and was thrown away if you did nothing else bad.   If no money taken ask if this is removed from your file and not part of your permanent record.  I tried not to take out money and Would specifically tell my troops this would not follow them if they behaved the rest of the time with me.   Jobs on the outside will also ask about this .  So it is important to know if it is permanent or not.  Also make sure it is pulled if you can.
« Last Edit: Jan 29, 2008, 08:23 by thenukeman »

taterhead

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #2 on: Jan 29, 2008, 08:42 »
Is there anyway to recover in the eyes of a training command? Any help at all would be greatly appreciated.

Last things first...

Is there a way to recover?  Absolutely.  Will it take time?  Yep.  Keep your head down, qualify as fast as you can, and prove yourself a hard worker.  Once NJP is over and done, the next question is what are you going to do?  Some Sailors use it to fuel bitterness and resentment and carry it through their entire enlistment.  Others move up and forward, and the COC forgets about it (as a former LCPO, I can tell you this pretty definitively).  Remember, your LPO, LCPO, DMC, RO all will get relieved before you even get halfway through your tour.

NJP is privacy act information, and cannot be disclosed by the command.  As long as you get that honorable discharge, which there is no reason to think you won't, whether or not you were found guilty of violating the UCMJ 4 years prior is of little consequence.  People go to mast for good and bad reasons.  There is no such thing as "beyond reasonable doubt."  The CO doles it out as he sees it, making it an imperfect system but effective for dealing with minor infractions on the fly.  I am not disagreeing about the Article 15 info, but having dealt with this quite recently, this is my experience.

As for the other questions, those are better off handled by a CCC.  I don't have the instruction in front of me.

Good luck-
« Last Edit: Jan 29, 2008, 08:47 by taterhead »

theldron

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #3 on: Jan 30, 2008, 04:55 »
Thanks for the posts

Fermi2

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #4 on: Jan 30, 2008, 05:40 »
You should have kept your nose clean.


Mike

theldron

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #5 on: Jan 30, 2008, 05:52 »
You don't even have an idea as to what I did or didn't do. I didn't post this to have you flame me, or to look down on me. Was merely asking advice from senior enlisted or officer personnel who might know something I don't in light of the questions I asked. If you don't have something helpful to add please don't add anything at all.

ddklbl

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #6 on: Jan 30, 2008, 06:26 »
Don't worry about it.  Do good things from here on out.  There used to be a lot of buzz from the cheap seats about those who didn't make chief failed to do so because they didn't have the DUI requisite to be a part of the club.  Enough CPO's had gotten DUI's to make the perception a reality.  Despite the grumblings from the disgruntled few, a lot of good people have been able to pick themselves up after a fall.

Offline Loffy Muffin

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 79
  • Karma: -30
  • Little hand says it is time to rock and roll
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #7 on: Jan 30, 2008, 06:39 »
Yeah, only dirtbags get NJP...should have requested a courts martial.  

Seriously, the biggest impact to your "career" is that you don't get one of those nice red ribbons at your 4 year point.  I think the A school NJP when you go up for 2nd class will be only an issue because of the low evals, but I think they get dropped after a certain time.  Last two evals get averaged or something like that.  You will not make E-5, most likely, with that eval.  
Plus, if you get another NJP you might be disqualed.  show up for watch early and get two alarm clocks, with one battery powered.  

Outside of the military it only exists in your memory.  

I had a couple of knucklehead A school roommates get wasted and proceed to trash the room, threaten other sailors, and then "ambush" the watchstander as he made his rounds.  Everyone in the room got put on report.  It happens, get used to it.  I wished I could tell you it got better, but it doesn't.  
See right through the red, white and blue disguise
With lecture I puncture the structure of lies
Installed in our minds and attempting
To hold us back
We've got to take it back, Take the power back

taterhead

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #8 on: Jan 30, 2008, 07:33 »
You should have kept your nose clean.


That goes without saying, but we are Sailors, not saints.  We move on.





Offline thenukeman

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1939
  • Karma: 1964
  • Elements Rule Battle , Elementis Regamus Proleium
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #9 on: Jan 30, 2008, 09:20 »
Non-Judicial Punishment Explained
Non-Judicial Punishment (NJP) is known by different terms among the services, such as "Article 15," "Office Hours," or "Captain's Mast," but the purpose of NJP is to discipline servicemembers for minor offenses such as reporting late for duty, petty theft, destroying government property, sleeping on watch, providing false information, and disobeying standing orders.

Note: Determining if an offense is "minor" is a matter of discretion for the commander imposing punishment, but the imposition of punishment for an offense other than a minor offense does not rule out a court-marital for the same offense.

Although the actual punishments under an NJP offense are limited to confinement on diminished rations, restriction to certain specified limits, arrest in quarters, correctional custody, extra duties, forfeiture of pay, detention of pay and reduction in grade. The extent of these punishments depends on the grade of the officer imposing punishment, the grade of the accused, and whether the accused is attached to or embarked on a vessel.

Prior to the imposition of nonjudicial punishment, an accused is entitled to notification:

that the imposition of nonjudicial punishment is being considered;
a description of the alleged offenses;
a summary of the evidence upon which the allegations are based;
notification that the accused has the right to refuse the imposition of punishment;
and any rights the accused has if NJP is accepted.
Except for individuals attached to or embarked on a vessel, servicemembers have the right to refuse the imposition of nonjudicial punishment. However refusal of NJP will normally not result in the dismissal of charges. A commanding officer can still refer the charges to court-martial.

An accused has the right to a personal appearance before the officer imposing punishment. During this appearance, the accused has the right against self-incrimination, the right to be accompanied by a spokesperson, the right to be informed of the evidence against him or her, the right to examine the evidence against him or her, the right to present matters on his or her own behalf, and to have the proceedings open to the public.

An accused may waive a personal appearance, if agreeable to the officer imposing punishment, and submit written matters for consideration by the imposition authority.


 The Military Rules of Evidence, other than rules concerning privileges, do not apply to the imposition of nonjudicial punishment. The officer imposing punishment may consider all relevant matters so long as the accused has been given proper notice and the opportunity to respond. The officer must be convinced of the accused's guilt by a preponderance of the evidence.

The accused may appeal the imposition of nonjudicial punishment on the grounds that it is unjust or disproportionate to the offense. The appeal must be in writing and forwarded to the next superior authority via the officer who imposed punishment.

The appeal must be referred to a judge advocate (JAG) for consideration and advice before the authority who is to act on it may make any decision.

Theldron, The main point is did they take Money.  If they did then you have it as a permanent record for life.  It will go with you. If you are asked this for civilian work clearances and for access to Nuclear power plants etc. you must answer yes. The good point if you keep your nose clean and do right this should not hurt you in the civilian world if you are honest.



theldron

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #10 on: Jan 30, 2008, 09:59 »
They definitely did take money. Reduction in Rank E-2, $250 x 2, 30 days restriction, 30 days extra duties (Suspended 6 months)

I've never never been late, never had an EMI or anything or the sort, all in all I'm a good sailor 3.0 on the eval 2 months after my mast so apparently I have changed things for the better in the eyes of at least the people dealing with me on a day to day basis.

I had put in a chit to have my rank mitigated back to E-3 I had a Chief and a Master Chief(SLPO and Class Director) going to bat for me but somewhere higher up someone didn't agree.

Thanks for all the advice.

taterhead

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #11 on: Jan 30, 2008, 10:18 »
Sorry Nukeman, I just don't see it.  I am dense, but I think you might be a little off.

If you are asked if you have ever been convicted of a crime, felony or misdemeanor, and all you have is a Captain's Mast for not shaving 3 days in a row, then you do not need to divulge it.  If you are asked if you received any non-judicial punishment or military discipline, then you must answer yes, and if that is what you mean, then that is a different question, and you have to own up to it (especially if there is a security clearance involved).   It's non-judicial, meaning a non-criminal action. 

Taking money or not taking money is irrelevant.  If the Captain finds you guilty, the punishment is irrelevant.  You get an entry in your service record just for being found guilty at mast, whether your punishment is taking money or scrubbing a toilet.

I guess I just don't see your point.  We might actually be agreeing for all I can tell.

Offline G-reg

  • Heavy User
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
  • Karma: 1261
  • Gender: Male
  • C'mere and chum some of this...
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #12 on: Jan 30, 2008, 11:56 »
Regarding advancement, the rules for TIR are kind of slippery when rate is made in a way other than from an advancement exam (like NJP or Command Advancements).  I would take this up with your Command Career Counselor, and have him SHOW YOU what the exact words of the rules are.

As for STAR (like many other programs), there are caveats for "No NJP in the past ___ months".  The time varies from 6 months for some programs, up to 36 months for the really selective programs.  Again, you and your Career Counselor should sit down and go through the all of the applicable reference documents regarding this.

The main thing is that you NOT take the CCC's word (or even my word) on the rules for TIR and STAR - don't believe anything you haven't read with your own eyes.  I'm not trying to say that anybody is going to "bum gouge" you deliberately, but nobody is perfect*.  Don't let a mistake on your part or somebody else's muck up your next advancement or reenlistment - make sure that everything is done BY THE BOOKS!

 - Greg

(*Excluding Rennhack.
If you're a GM, you know... ;))
"But that's just my opinion - I could be wrong."
  -  Dennis Miller

Offline PWHoppe

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 823
  • Karma: 2024
  • Gender: Male
  • CONFIRMED!: The dumbest man on the planet
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #13 on: Jan 31, 2008, 08:19 »
Theldron, The main point is did they take Money.  If they did then you have it as a permanent record for life.  It will go with you. If you are asked this for civilian work clearances and for access to Nuclear power plants etc. you must answer yes. The good point if you keep your nose clean and do right this should not hurt you in the civilian world if you are honest.

Nukeman,

I'm not sure where you are working (or have worked) but I have NEVER been asked about going to Captains Mast. I have been in the civilian world for almost 30 years and have never been denied access at any site (>24) nor did it ever come up when I got a "Q" clearance for the DOE. The only thing anybody wanted to see was my discharge paperwork and the fact I had an honorable discharge. Yes, I did go to Mast while in the USN and the only ramification was failure to get a good conduct medal at my 4 year mark (took me 6 to get my first one).

just keep your nose clean theldron and you'll be fine. Thank you for your service ;D
If a chicken and a half can lay an egg and a half in a day and a half, how many days will it take a grasshopper with a rubber foot to kick a hole in a tin can?

Forum rules..http://www.nukeworker.co

Offline thenukeman

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1939
  • Karma: 1964
  • Elements Rule Battle , Elementis Regamus Proleium
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #14 on: Jan 31, 2008, 08:50 »
I checked for Federal clearance SF 86  http://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/SF86.pdf

You are correct, It only asked about Discharge,  I know I have been asked on other forms I have filled out.   As an officer I tried to be fair and was specifically told if you take money you create a permanent record.  I tried not to except for real dirtballs.   My commander got mad at me for not being hard enough.   Bottom line if they don't ask don't tell.

The Personal history Questionnaire does ask this for unescorted access to a nuclear plant. 

You must list felony, misdemeanor, traffic** or military criminal history
to include court martial or non-judicial punishment including guilty pleas and “nolo contendere” (meaning no contest);
any suspended sentences, pretrial diversions, dismissals, “nolle prosequi” (meaning not prosecuted). (**You must
include any alcohol/drug-related traffic offenses or those involving suspension or revocation of your driver’s license, but
do not need to list non-injury traffic or parking offenses.)
« Last Edit: Jan 31, 2008, 09:01 by thenukeman »

BuddyThePug

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #15 on: Jan 31, 2008, 09:02 »

all in all I'm a good sailor 3.0 on the eval


You don't even have an idea as to what I did or didn't do. I didn't post this to have you flame me, or to look down on me.

3.0 on the new 5.0 scale is not exactly stellar. Even in the 4.0 days of old, evals at 3.6 or below multiplied by near-aceing the rating exam didn't get advanced.

As far as the tough love here, it isn't nearly as harsh as the judgements, right or wrong, that the senior enlisted will form seeing the bad apple with a recent bust.

The best advice IMHO was Loffy Muffin's. Hard work and humility will be the only remedy. Never admitting fault, and telling people how swell you are, will only confirm their notion that you are not destined for success.

taterhead

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #16 on: Jan 31, 2008, 09:43 »
While students are in the pipeline they are pretty much 3.0 across the board unless they are class leader or have some equivalent collateral duty. 

They aren't really personally evaluated, per se, more or less just mass-evaluated for the sake of easing administrative burden.

Offline PWHoppe

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 823
  • Karma: 2024
  • Gender: Male
  • CONFIRMED!: The dumbest man on the planet
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #17 on: Jan 31, 2008, 10:12 »
The Personal history Questionnaire does ask this for unescorted access to a nuclear plant. 

You must list felony, misdemeanor, traffic** or military criminal history
to include court martial or non-judicial punishment including guilty pleas and “nolo contendere” (meaning no contest);
any suspended sentences, pretrial diversions, dismissals, “nolle prosequi” (meaning not prosecuted). (**You must
include any alcohol/drug-related traffic offenses or those involving suspension or revocation of your driver’s license, but
do not need to list non-injury traffic or parking offenses.)

I stand corrected ;)

Apparently since my introduction to civilian nuclear power the questionnaire has changed somewhat. I haven't filled one of these out in (?) years. I do not recall that statement being on the security documentation that I filled out back in the late '70's, or if it was there I ignored it ::)
If a chicken and a half can lay an egg and a half in a day and a half, how many days will it take a grasshopper with a rubber foot to kick a hole in a tin can?

Forum rules..http://www.nukeworker.co

Offline thenukeman

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1939
  • Karma: 1964
  • Elements Rule Battle , Elementis Regamus Proleium
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #18 on: Jan 31, 2008, 10:36 »
I stand corrected, I was also wrong on the SF86 http://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/SF86.pdf It does not ask you about captains Mast in the military part but does ask you in the criminal part, section 23 E.  So I was originally right and did not read far enough the second time, Hopefully the third time is right considering I have now both in writing,  Bottom line Theldron, Keep your nose clean, keep a good attitude, tell the truth when asked about this and you should be OK in 99 percent of the time, If you lie you won't have much of a chance since money has been taken out and the investigator can see this in your military record.
« Last Edit: Jan 31, 2008, 10:37 by thenukeman »

Offline Already Gone

  • Curmudgeon At Large
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1769
  • Karma: 3388
  • Gender: Male
  • Did I say that out loud?
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #19 on: Jan 31, 2008, 12:53 »
I came a little late to this discussion.  Sorry.
There is nothing you can do now about the past.  The best advice has been given:  do better from now on.  If you give your best, nobody is going to care what you did once upon a time.  If you have not been given notice of removal from the program, then you are still in the program - at least for now.  So work it like nothing happened.  Do not listen to rumors.  The Navy is full of BS information.  The only information that counts is what is on paper and the orders they give you.  Got that?  Forget about worrying.  Worry fixes nothing.  Do what you do as well as you can and accept what happens with the knowledge that you did your best.

NJP is absolutely of NO CONCERN once you get out.
I had NJP in the Navy, which resulted in loss of pay, loss of paygrade, and a lot more.  Bottom line - "Have you been convicted of a Felony?"  "No," says I.  "Okay, then, are there any charges pending against you currently?"  "No" once again.  End of discussion.

Actually, they'll ask if you have been convicted of a crime (which includes misdemeanors) but only felonies count against you.  Anything drug-related can be a problem, as well as certain activity that is best described as un-American.  I know of one person who was convicted of murder who worked for years in nuke plants after serving his sentence.  He was a great guy, who got into a fight at the wrong time with the wrong thing in his hand when he was barely an adult, and paid his debt to society.

You can get de-nuked, busted several paygrades, and booted out on a general discharge, and STILL work in civilian nuclear power.  The real question is: did you graduate from the school?

The DOE ... well, let's just say that there needs to be somewhere for people to work after they fail a drug test at a civilian nuke.

Some people, including some on this site, want to believe that they are perfect.  They convince themselves that they are, based on the logic that only a perfect person could possibly do what they have done or have the job that they have.  This is nonsense.  People make mistakes.  I only know of one perfect person, and look what happened to Him.
« Last Edit: Jan 31, 2008, 12:59 by BeerCourt »
"To be content with little is hard; to be content with much, impossible." - Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach

Offline PWHoppe

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 823
  • Karma: 2024
  • Gender: Male
  • CONFIRMED!: The dumbest man on the planet
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #20 on: Jan 31, 2008, 01:12 »
The DOE ... well, let's just say that there needs to be somewhere for people to work after they fail a drug test at a civilian nuke.

Too funny, but true. However those that have always been at DOE sites tend to think their requirements are the same as the power plants. I know better, after the FFD thing started, where did all the techs go who didn't study for the urine exam ??? DOE

NJP is absolutely of NO CONCERN once you get out.
I had NJP in the Navy, which resulted in loss of pay, loss of paygrade, and a lot more.  Bottom line - "Have you been convicted of a Felony?"  "No," says I.  "Okay, then, are there any charges pending against you currently?"  "No" once again.  End of discussion.

Exactly my experience when I got into the civilian world. Maybe that's why I don't remember anything about questions pertaining to NJP...of course that was in the pre-FFD days, so maybe they did ask :-X
« Last Edit: Jan 31, 2008, 01:19 by PWHoppe »
If a chicken and a half can lay an egg and a half in a day and a half, how many days will it take a grasshopper with a rubber foot to kick a hole in a tin can?

Forum rules..http://www.nukeworker.co

Cycoticpenguin

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #21 on: Jan 31, 2008, 03:21 »
You don't even have an idea as to what I did or didn't do. I didn't post this to have you flame me, or to look down on me. Was merely asking advice from senior enlisted or officer personnel who might know something I don't in light of the questions I asked. If you don't have something helpful to add please don't add anything at all.

welcome to nukeworker.com shipmate :)

Offline thenukeman

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1939
  • Karma: 1964
  • Elements Rule Battle , Elementis Regamus Proleium
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #22 on: Jan 31, 2008, 05:20 »
But I do agree with Theldron in this, he was asking for help not a kick again while he is down for something he already has done and can not change.  I try to kick people only in the Polysci area when they asked for it, need it, or just for someone being a liberal.  LOL  Here is not the place I would think.

Offline thenukeman

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1939
  • Karma: 1964
  • Elements Rule Battle , Elementis Regamus Proleium
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #23 on: Jan 31, 2008, 05:22 »
DOE is the second chance for Dope smokers,  First time caught there goes your clearance, second time out the door usually.  Nuke Plants 0 tolerance!! 5 years maybe back, but I heard mostly its a permanent ban.

JustinHEMI05

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #24 on: Jan 31, 2008, 05:25 »
welcome to nukeworker.com shipmate :)


I just threw up in my mouth. Thanks.  :P

Justin
« Last Edit: Jan 31, 2008, 06:47 by JustinHEMI05 »

ddklbl

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #25 on: Jan 31, 2008, 06:07 »
I just through up in my mouth. Thanks.  :P

Justin

-2 sp.

JustinHEMI05

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #26 on: Jan 31, 2008, 06:48 »
-2 sp.

Oops! Fixed! Thanks for the backup. :)

Justin

vikingfan

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #27 on: Jan 31, 2008, 07:33 »
you can still have a successful nuclear career even with NJP or a court martial on your record ! heck there lots of us in that situation ! " take me to the brig " !! I want to go see the real marines. " Chesty Puller "

theldron

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #28 on: Feb 04, 2008, 05:48 »
3.0 on the new 5.0 scale is not exactly stellar. Even in the 4.0 days of old, evals at 3.6 or below multiplied by near-aceing the rating exam didn't get advanced.

As far as the tough love here, it isn't nearly as harsh as the judgements, right or wrong, that the senior enlisted will form seeing the bad apple with a recent bust.

The best advice IMHO was Loffy Muffin's. Hard work and humility will be the only remedy. Never admitting fault, and telling people how swell you are, will only confirm their notion that you are not destined for success.

Can only get above a 3.0 if you have some kind of extra duty. And its pretty good for having been masted only 2 months before that. As for humility and the like, I'm not telling you how swell I am or were merely defending the fact that I'm not a sh*tbag.
« Last Edit: Feb 04, 2008, 05:53 by theldron »

Offline Loffy Muffin

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 79
  • Karma: -30
  • Little hand says it is time to rock and roll
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #29 on: Feb 04, 2008, 07:09 »
By humility, that doesn't mean you to be walter mitty, it just means that you will have to practice low risk behavior until you get your quals.  You will not survive another mast.  The best part of the Navy is having people similar to you to go out with and have a little fun.  The problem with going out and raging is things can happen out of your control that might get you put in harm way. 

So, unfortunately, you might have to pass on hitting the bars and road trips or at least make sure you drive yourself so if things start to get out of control you can eject.  A big part of the Navy experience is the friendships you will develop during the training phase and you might miss out on some of this if you want to reduce the risk of another incident.  Sorry. 
See right through the red, white and blue disguise
With lecture I puncture the structure of lies
Installed in our minds and attempting
To hold us back
We've got to take it back, Take the power back

Offline matthew7899

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Karma: 6
  • Tell Recruiters to use NukeWorker.com
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #30 on: Feb 06, 2008, 10:31 »
Have you taken G-regs advice?  From what I've read, he is the only one that really answered your question.

Go to the CCC and look at the instructions yourself.

It seems as though you've figured most of this out, but here are a few examples to go by.....

Not sure what you're rate is, but there is a certain Master Chief that is at A school that went to Mast when he was in A school (he was a CL and tried to cover for a shipmate), long story short....learned from his mistakes and was successful.

I got to my sub out of prototype and we got a SPU about 6 months after that, he was coming to us as an E-4 (should have been an E-5), turns out he was Masted for blazing off signatures....came to the boat and HIT the books, qualified like a mad man and the CO suspended the bust....got back E-5 and his TIR!!  He took the E-6 exam and made it.  Only person that I have heard of to be an E-4, E-5 and E-6 all in one year.

There is life after Mast, some of the BEST nukes are those that have went to Mast (they have a better understanding for the pride in their work a little more).

Good luck, sounds like you will be fine.

Matt
« Last Edit: Feb 06, 2008, 10:38 by matthew7899 »

Mnemorath

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #31 on: Feb 08, 2008, 05:51 »
What about if they de-nuke you and pull clearance at a NJP? Thats the threat I am currently under for being UA to a BCA for a mock PRT. My Senior Chief has been ridding my ass about being to fat and having 2 BCA failures under my belt with a third threatening.

JustinHEMI05

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #32 on: Feb 08, 2008, 06:33 »
What about if they de-nuke you and pull clearance at a NJP? Thats the threat I am currently under for being UA to a BCA for a mock PRT. My Senior Chief has been ridding my ass about being to fat and having 2 BCA failures under my belt with a third threatening.

The commercial world doesn't care if you are fat, unless you can't pass your physical. What does your clearance have anything to with being fat, except that it will be pulled as soon as you don't need it? Thats normal, and won't have any affect on anything on the outside. Just don't lie about it.

Justin

taterhead

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #33 on: Feb 08, 2008, 06:35 »
I am not sure that the command can pull a clearance...they don't grant them in the first place.  That part doesn't make sense.

In fact, they can't actually denuke you; they have to recommend that you be denuked to the ECM in Washington, who then decides whether or not to pull the NEC.  That said, they can take your TLD and place you anywhere on the ship they want doing whatever non-nuke work they want.  The NEC part comes through DC, though, and comes with a rate conversion.
« Last Edit: Feb 08, 2008, 06:36 by taterhead »

JustinHEMI05

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #34 on: Feb 08, 2008, 06:40 »
I am not sure that the command can pull a clearance...they don't grant them in the first place.  That part doesn't make sense.

In fact, they can't actually denuke you; they have to recommend that you be denuked to the ECM in Washington, who then decides whether or not to pull the NEC.  That said, they can take your TLD and place you anywhere on the ship they want doing whatever non-nuke work they want.  The NEC part comes through DC, though, and comes with a rate conversion.

He is right. Sounds like your CMC is talking out his ass. You can't be de nuked for being fat, but you can be de-navied for being fat. Point is, it won't have any affect on the outside (at least it shouldn't).

Justin

culturekrazy

  • Guest
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #35 on: Feb 19, 2008, 07:32 »
My son was an EM2 aboard a submarine.  He received a non-judicial punishment in November.  He was reduced in rank, his pay was taken, and then his commander set him off the ship in San Diego.  He was dead only 2 days after the incident.  My question: Is it common practice to set a sailor off the sub when their entire group was to be back in their regular harbor in less than a week?  He did not do anything violent; his Master Cheif was his advocate on board ship and totally disagreed with the punishment.  I don't even care if he deserved the pay rate and rank deduction (his life).  I am mostly concerned with his commander setting him off the ship to make his way back up the coast to his duty station. 
What do you guys think?
Thank you in advance for reading my momma nosey message.

Offline thenukeman

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1939
  • Karma: 1964
  • Elements Rule Battle , Elementis Regamus Proleium
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #36 on: Feb 19, 2008, 09:10 »
I disagreed with A punishment My Colonel gave a E-4, 45 days Restriction  45 days extra duty, 2/3 his pay for 2 months and reduction to E-2.  But basically a field grade officer is God, and unless you can disprove what you are being accused of, you basically have to take the punishment or go to court marshall which is usually a lot worse if they can prove you did something.  Throwing someone off the Sub is also the Commanders discretion.  I am now older and can now see that you have to make examples of people who disobey the rules. I think now I would have agreed with my Colonel.   The chief probably should have asked if the Seaman could make it back to base on his own.  I lent my Specialist about 100 bucks, but since he had a family I never saw that money back. 

Offline Already Gone

  • Curmudgeon At Large
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1769
  • Karma: 3388
  • Gender: Male
  • Did I say that out loud?
Re: Non Judicial Punishment
« Reply #37 on: Feb 19, 2008, 10:21 »
My son was an EM2 aboard a submarine.  He received a non-judicial punishment in November.  He was reduced in rank, his pay was taken, and then his commander set him off the ship in San Diego.  He was dead only 2 days after the incident.  My question: Is it common practice to set a sailor off the sub when their entire group was to be back in their regular harbor in less than a week?  He did not do anything violent; his Master Cheif was his advocate on board ship and totally disagreed with the punishment.  I don't even care if he deserved the pay rate and rank deduction (his life).  I am mostly concerned with his commander setting him off the ship to make his way back up the coast to his duty station. 
What do you guys think?
Thank you in advance for reading my momma nosey message.

For the morale of the crew and sometimes for the good of the sailor himself, they are usually removed immediately.  I have seen them flown home from Europe and even transferred off the ship while it is at sea (not easy on a sub, but it is done).

I am sorry for your loss, and grateful for your son's service.  I wish that the circumstances of his passing were different, but that doesn't change the fact that he was your son and you have every right to be proud of him.
"To be content with little is hard; to be content with much, impossible." - Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?