Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Use of Tagout by support groups

Author Topic: Use of Tagout by support groups  (Read 4374 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline retired nuke

  • Family Man
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1508
  • Total likes: 33
  • Karma: 3536
  • Gender: Male
  • No longer a nuke
Use of Tagout by support groups
« on: Nov 20, 2008, 12:35 »
OK, here is a safety question, an Ops question, a maintenance question and an RP question...all in one.

When support groups (RP, QA, etc) are working with maintenance / craft on a system, and the system is tagged out (isolated, depressurized, danger tagged, etc) - are the support folks at your site (or in your experience) required to be signed onto the tagout order like maintenance? or is the fact that maintenance is signed onto the tags sufficient?
Please be specific if different conditions require different answers. I realize that covering several valve jobs in an area, and basically getting dose rates and smears may not warrant protection on tags, but surveying inside MSIVs, Pressurizer, S/G, confined spaces, etc may be considered different. Same for QA doing a VT at a hold point vs doing a PT inside piping....

Thanks in advance for any replies.  :)
Remember who you love. Remember what is sacred. Remember what is true.
Remember that you will die, and that this day is a gift. Remember how you wish to live, may the blessing of the Lord be with you

Offline Nuclear NASCAR

  • Electrician
  • Forum Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 935
  • Total likes: 12
  • Karma: 3092
  • Gender: Male
  • Everyone needs a Harley. Mine's furry with 4 legs.
Re: Use of Tagout by support groups
« Reply #1 on: Nov 20, 2008, 01:35 »
When QC is working on a job that has workers protection associated with it they do have to sign onto that protection just as we do.  I don't believe that RP has been required to because they are usually doing a survey upon breach of a system and then moving on to the next job. 

I'll ask around when I see some of the RP techs and find out about whether there are any conditions where they do have to sign onto protection.
"There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge."

  -Bertrand Russell

alphadude

  • Guest
Re: Use of Tagout by support groups
« Reply #2 on: Nov 20, 2008, 08:22 »
Total safety would mandate anyone working in the system zone (risk area)  be aware and signed in. (being signed in doesn't mean you have to hold the isolation) Signing in places the burden of safety on the owner of the isolation to ensure that no one is in harms way if the isolation is pulled or fails. How can you do this if you don't know who is working where? (remember surveys and inspections are work too) 

Prior to pulling the isolation, the owner is required to hunt down all that are signed in under his clearance. If its not done this way, workers are at risk if the isolation is pulled and they are not aware.


Anybody touching, looking at, in the zone of operation should be aware that a system is either isolated or ready to rock and roll. A good example would be a 100ft line that runs thru several buildings. would you want someone to crank it up for a hot functional and you are there taking a swipe and standing in the sway zone ???


The survey butterfly (hp floating thru) sounds like years past. Bopping in and out of a high risk area don't sound like good practice.

STAR it
« Last Edit: Nov 20, 2008, 08:55 by alphadude »

Offline SloGlo

  • meter reader
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 5749
  • Total likes: 185
  • Karma: 2641
  • Gender: Male
  • trust me, i'm an hp
Re: Use of Tagout by support groups
« Reply #3 on: Nov 21, 2008, 12:23 »
are the support folks at your site (or in your experience) required to be signed onto the tagout order like maintenance? or is the fact that maintenance is signed onto the tags sufficient?


 i've seen it done both weighs.  the common danominator between them is dat frunt line management is to be notified of changing conditions (lifting da clearance, venting a sisstem, testing, ett cettarra) 'n day are to insure da work force is aware of da change.
quando omni flunkus moritati

dubble eye, dubble yew, dubble aye!

dew the best ya kin, wit watt ya have, ware yinze are!

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2021 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?