Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu DOE Denies USEC ACP Loan Guarantee honeypot

Author Topic: DOE Denies USEC ACP Loan Guarantee  (Read 10103 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Keln

  • Guest
DOE Denies USEC ACP Loan Guarantee
« on: Jul 30, 2009, 06:04 »
http://www.usec.com/NewsRoom/NewsReleases/USECInc/2009/2009-07-28-Department-Of-Energy-Denies.htm

I work at USEC, and if you haven't heard, we have been developing centrifuge uranium enrichment technology, and building the machines and everything else to produce enriched uranium for our country's needs well into the future. We were led to believe by the Department of Energy last year that we would more than qualify for their Loan Guarantee program for cutting edge energy technologies. We are the only US company that enriches uranium...that stuff the rest of the nuclear world uses as fuel. USEC currently uses an old method called gaseous diffusion, and has only one plant left enriching uranium. This method is very expensive and energy inefficient. Centrifuge technology is incredibly more efficient than gaseous diffusion, which is why USEC decided to develop along that route. The French and the Russians both have centrifuge technology enriching uranium today, so this technology is proven. USEC set out to make it better than theirs, and we think we have. After spending over a Billion of our own capital for the research and development, the project depended on the loan guarantee from the DOE program to actually put it into full scale operation. There are many reasons why such a facility would be important, not just to those of us in the nuclear industry, but to our nation's security interests. The DOE has, however, decided to not award USEC the loan guarantee, and the project is on a precipice.

This is a bad sign from the current administration. This shows that the DOE is willing to place our energy needs in the hands of foreign companies, to get the fuel for our reactors. In the case of Areva, they are owned by the French government. Areva also has bid for the loan guarantee...this means the French government is looking for American taxpayer's money to develop French interests. I don't know if the DOE will respond the same way to Areva or not. All I can say is that my confidence in the current administration's feelings towards nuclear energy has been shaken. President Obama himself campaigned here in Southern Ohio last year and promised to support USEC in getting the loan guarantee. Perhaps a domestic source of enriched uranium is now not a priority to Mr. Chu or the President now.

Obviously, I want USEC to succeed. But I'm sharing this recent news and my perspective on it with you all because it's not just about USEC, or even where our reactors will get their fuel in the future. I fear what this means for the whole nuclear industry. I am worried that the current administration might be more hostile towards nuclear energy than we thought. I'd pay attention to this situation, and see if and how the President reacts to it. A group of Congressmen and women are meeting tonight at about 8:30pm eastern to discuss this situation in a special meeting. You should be able to see it on C-SPAN. They have promised to take this issue up with the President, and remind him of his promise he made last year.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17140
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: DOE Denies USEC ACP Loan Guarantee
« Reply #1 on: Jul 30, 2009, 10:28 »
The DOE seems to be saying that the loan approval should be delayed a year while the technology is being vetted. They recommended that USEC withdraw its application at this time, as it would be denied today but perhaps approved in a year or so.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17140
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: DOE Denies USEC ACP Loan Guarantee
« Reply #2 on: Jul 31, 2009, 11:05 »
I'm sensing a wager in the offing,...

Not speculation or rumor, bet if you like    ;)

 At the same time, the Department has encouraged USEC to withdraw its application for loan guarantee funding for the American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon.  This would allow USEC to work over the next 12-18 months to continue research, development, and testing to resolve the technology issues facing ACP without hurting the chances of USEC to secure approval for a loan guarantee in the future. 

http://www.energy.gov/news2009/7702.htm

Keln

  • Guest
Re: DOE Denies USEC ACP Loan Guarantee
« Reply #3 on: Aug 01, 2009, 03:51 »
150 or so of us from the ACP and the Pike county community took a trip to Washington DC today. We left last night on 3 buses, and just got back an hour or so ago. It was a very long day. We may have done some good though, as the latest word is that the DOE will re-evaluate their position (or so we were told). Talking to representatives and senators all day though did not leave us with a very good feeling, I'll admit. Too many were obviously blowing sunshine. I think we must have walked 20 miles today all over the capitol from one office to another's. Quite a tour, though none of us were in the mood to enjoy it.

A 12-18 month delay will kill this project, and the DOE is well aware of this. The technology is proven, which is why the reasoning behind the DOE's claims are suspect. Centrifuges are not a new concept, and our specific design belongs to the DOE and is over 20 years old, we just modernized it. It was a purely political decision, and we think we can use political pressure to get it reversed.

ebf

  • Guest
Re: DOE Denies USEC ACP Loan Guarantee
« Reply #4 on: Aug 29, 2011, 02:54 »
any news on the progress?

milo124

  • Guest
Re: DOE Denies USEC ACP Loan Guarantee
« Reply #5 on: Aug 30, 2011, 11:04 »
Their web site has a lot of information, although the OP may have the "word on the street."

http://www.usec.com/NewsRoom/NewsReleases/USECInc/2011/2011-08-15-USEC-Toshiba-And-Babcock.htm

ebf

  • Guest
Re: DOE Denies USEC ACP Loan Guarantee
« Reply #6 on: Sep 01, 2011, 08:52 »
Thank you Milo124.  I'd be very interested in what Kein has to say also since he works there and may have further insight as to what's going on with this.  I have read all the information I could find between articles and their website.  thanks.

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?