Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Volunteer or Volun-Told? (Submarines)  

Author Topic: Volunteer or Volun-Told? (Submarines)  (Read 6218 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nukeplease

  • Guest
Volunteer or Volun-Told? (Submarines)
« on: Jan 19, 2011, 12:08 »
Hey everybody.

I was just wondering what the deal was with submarines in the enlisted nuke field.  It is my understanding that submarine time is voluntary but I look at how many more subs the Navy has compared to carriers and I feel like a large majority of enlisted nukes must be on submarines.

Is serving time on a sub a part of every enlisted nukes career?  Can you have a good career staying on carriers only (If that is even possible)?

Also, no offense to any sub people out there. I'm just curious about the distribution of people.

Thanks!

Offline Gamecock

  • Subject Matter Expert
  • *
  • Posts: 1202
  • Karma: 2367
  • Gender: Male
  • "Perfection is the enemy of good enough."
Re: Volunteer or Volun-Told? (Submarines)
« Reply #1 on: Jan 19, 2011, 05:56 »
Hey everybody.

I was just wondering what the deal was with submarines in the enlisted nuke field.  It is my understanding that submarine time is voluntary but I look at how many more subs the Navy has compared to carriers and I feel like a large majority of enlisted nukes must be on submarines.

Is serving time on a sub a part of every enlisted nukes career? no


Can you have a good career staying on carriers only (If that is even possible)?yes

Also, no offense to any sub people out there. I'm just curious about the distribution of people.

Thanks!
“If the thought police come... we will meet them at the door, respectfully, unflinchingly, willing to die... holding a copy of the sacred Scriptures in one hand and the US Constitution in the other."

Offline DDMurray

  • Heavy User
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
  • Karma: 994
  • Gender: Male
  • Tell Recruiters to use NukeWorker.com
Re: Volunteer or Volun-Told? (Submarines)
« Reply #2 on: Jan 19, 2011, 07:20 »
A sub has roughly 35-40 enlisted nukes (so SSBNs would have 70-80).  A carrier has roughly 350-450 (Enterprise has more I think).  The surface numbers may be a little off.  When I graduated from prototype in 1986, if you had not volunteered subs before NPTU, you were going surface.  I knew several guys who had volunteered subs that still went surface.  At the time they were manning up the Ike so many a baby nuke got sent there.  My uncle who took to me to the recruiter had been a submariner and recommended I volunteer for sub-duty.  My original plan was to be an submarine RM.  Once I switched to nuke, I maintained my sub-vol. 

Gamecock answered your other questions.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
T. Roosevelt

Offline MMM

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 582
  • Karma: 79
  • Gender: Male
Re: Volunteer or Volun-Told? (Submarines)
« Reply #3 on: Jan 19, 2011, 11:30 »
Clarification on surface numbers: Reactor Dept. has about 400 personnel, about 300 are nuclear trained, the others are not.

nukeplease

  • Guest
Re: Volunteer or Volun-Told? (Submarines)
« Reply #4 on: Jan 19, 2011, 01:23 »
I had no idea there were so many enlisted Nukes on a surface ship.

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?