Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Fort Calhoun  

Author Topic: Fort Calhoun  (Read 31641 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RDTroja

  • Site Heretic
  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4015
  • Karma: 4558
  • Gender: Male
  • I knew I got into IT for a reason!
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #25 on: Jun 29, 2011, 08:32 »
"I won't eat anything that has intelligent life, but I'd gladly eat a network executive or a politician."

                                  -Marty Feldman

"Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to understand that it bears a very close resemblance to the first."
                                  -Ronald Reagan

I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it.

                                  - Voltaire

reactorpro

  • Guest
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #26 on: Jul 07, 2011, 04:53 »
If nuke power were EZ..then the media would work in this field.

LaFeet

  • Guest
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #27 on: Jul 14, 2011, 07:44 »
Give me some waders and I'd gladly swab some lower level rooms when the water receeds... I love Ft Calhoun 8)

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #28 on: Jul 24, 2011, 12:28 »
some newer news aerial footage from the media, without tinfoil...


Offline ToadSuck

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Karma: 25
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #29 on: Dec 14, 2011, 08:25 »
Anybody heard anything about the NRC shutting down Fort Calhoun??? I heard they went the route of Davis Besse....

tagline

  • Guest
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #30 on: Dec 14, 2011, 08:35 »
Which way? Hole in reactor head? SCWE? Bad management? Been given an INPO 1 and not deserving?

Offline Higgs

  • SRO
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • Karma: 1284
  • Gender: Male
  • Life has a melody...
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #31 on: Dec 14, 2011, 08:42 »
Nothing at all about it recently on the NRC website, that I can find. Still seaching. Last thing I found was their event declaration for the flood.
"How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic.” - Ted Nugent

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #32 on: Dec 14, 2011, 08:48 »
NRC delays restart of Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station

By ALGIS J. LAUKAITIS / Lincoln Journal Star | Posted: Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Plans to restart the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station in January have been pushed back indefinitely by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The NRC moved Fort Calhoun into a special inspection category Tuesday and notified plant owner Omaha Public Power District by letter that it was delaying the restart of the plant because of significant performance and/or operational concerns that will require additional oversight.

"It's a very high level of oversight," said Victor Dricks, spokesman for NRC Region IV, based in Arlington, Texas.

OPPD spokesman Mike Jones said the inspection category is for nuclear power plants that have been shut down for a long time.

Fort Calhoun, 20 miles north of Omaha along the Missouri River, was shut down for a routine refueling outage in April and kept offline during Missouri River flooding as a safety precaution. Floodwaters subsided in September.

"OPPD has and will continue to aggressively and thoroughly address these issues until they are resolved," OPPD President and CEO W. Gary Gates said in a news release. "We are committed to returning Fort Calhoun Station to its normal high-performing plant status as soon as possible."

Jones said OPPD is working with the NRC to restart the plant sometime in the second quarter of 2012. Getting the plant ready will take time, he said, and some inspections that were scheduled earlier were delayed by the flood.

The NRC letter cited the following reasons for placing Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station in the special inspection category.

* Inadequate strategies to protect the plant from flooding; NRC finding issued Oct. 6, 2010.

* Failure of electrical components used to automatically shut down the reactor; NRC finding issued July 18.

* Fort Calhoun Station's placement in Column IV because plant performance has been degraded for more than four consecutive quarters. Column V is the worst.

* A significant operational event on June 7 that involved a fire in a switch gear. NRC attributed the fire to inadequate design or improper installation of electrical components.

In its letter, the NRC said it made the decision to delay the restart of the plant because of performance concerns involving the fire and recovery actions associated with the flood.

"This decision, in part, was made due to the lack of a definitive plant start-up date, the need to perform additional extent of cause and extent of condition reviews to fully understand the breadth of performance issues, and the need to develop and implement corrective actions ...," the NRC wrote.

Dricks said the NRC also has concerns about the plant's emergency response program, saying OPPD failed to notify state and local officials within 15 minutes of declaring an emergency. Jones said the utility did so in 16 minutes.

In a separate non-emergency exercise, OPPD withdrew a "protective action recommendation" the utility had communicated to emergency responders, the NRC said.

So far, OPPD has spent $32 million to replace the electricity that would have been generated by Fort Calhoun, Jones said.

Most of that amount was spent over the summer when demand for power was high, he said.

Overall, the Missouri River flood has cost OPPD $75.9 million, he said.

http://journalstar.com/news/state-and-regional/nebraska/nrc-delays-restart-of-fort-calhoun-nuclear-station/article_9109a3b5-6274-5c27-8ba1-8d3a45c9ecf0.html

Offline Higgs

  • SRO
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • Karma: 1284
  • Gender: Male
  • Life has a melody...
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #33 on: Dec 14, 2011, 08:53 »
Ah, here we go.

http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/2011/12/13/fort-calhoun-nuclear-plant-gets-more-nrc-oversight/

And the actual letter to from the NRC can be found by searching for ML113470721 in the ADAMS system.

Column IV huh? That ain't good.

Have fun boys!
« Last Edit: Dec 14, 2011, 09:01 by Higgs »
"How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic.” - Ted Nugent

tagline

  • Guest
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #34 on: Dec 15, 2011, 12:54 »
Thanks for the info. This is minor compared to Davis-Messe.

LaFeet

  • Guest
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #35 on: Dec 15, 2011, 09:09 »
Yeah   just a little bit.   The main focus seems to be electrical and flood issues.

Their performance rating dropped mainly due to being shutdown for so long

Ft C should be up and running by June

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #36 on: Dec 15, 2011, 09:42 »
Ft C should be up and running by June

Of which year ??

This is sounding more and more like Rancho Breako, just with better steak and pheasant close by...

Offline wingnut

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 31
  • Karma: 7
  • I love NukeWorker.com!
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #37 on: Dec 16, 2011, 08:06 »
Hope they don't end up like Cook that struggled from 1997 to 2000 to get up and running.

Offline Zog

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 51
  • Karma: 10
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #38 on: Dec 16, 2011, 03:18 »
Yeah   just a little bit.   The main focus seems to be electrical and flood issues.

Their performance rating dropped mainly due to being shutdown for so long

Ft C should be up and running by June

Crazy thing is the fire was caused by the cradle used to retrofill a new breaker in old switcgear that had perfectly good breakers that have proven to be reliable in many plants for many years, yet they contunue to add more of these retrofills.

Fermi2

  • Guest
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #39 on: Dec 16, 2011, 04:38 »
I heard they might never start up....

Offline Nuclear NASCAR

  • Electrician
  • Forum Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 938
  • Karma: 3094
  • Gender: Male
  • Everyone needs a Harley. Mine's furry with 4 legs.
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #40 on: Dec 16, 2011, 04:46 »
Crazy thing is the fire was caused by the cradle used to retrofill a new breaker in old switcgear that had perfectly good breakers that have proven to be reliable in many plants for many years, yet they contunue to add more of these retrofills.

If it's like our plant it's due to lack of manufacturer for the old switchgear.  The switchgear is not subpar but parts are drying up and rebuilds going to be coming up in a few years.  Someone could make a good living making and qualifying quality replacements I believe.
"There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge."

  -Bertrand Russell

Offline Zog

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 51
  • Karma: 10
Re: Fort Calhoun
« Reply #41 on: Dec 19, 2011, 10:40 »
If it's like our plant it's due to lack of manufacturer for the old switchgear.  The switchgear is not subpar but parts are drying up and rebuilds going to be coming up in a few years.  Someone could make a good living making and qualifying quality replacements I believe.

Politics make that harder than it should be, long story.

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?