Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker Menu

Crystal River Decommissioning

Started by Davidj, Feb 28, 2013, 07:22

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Davidj

Yes, I know that Duke has opted for SafStor, but it makes sense that some decommissioning should be done, at least a site historical characterization.  Does anyone have any info on who might have the inside track on contracts?  I'm a PMP with MARSSIM and 15 years as a radeng and I worked at CR3 back in the mid-80s.

snowman

They will be companies that probably haven't even been thought of yet. In other words, this is years and years down the road. That plant will sit idle with minimum staffing for 10-15 years, if not more.


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2025 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?