Is it possible that while a decently run plant, Diablo Canyon might also be on the list? IIRC somewhere, there was supposed to be a vote in CA that nukes (now just them) can't run if they don't have a place to put the fuel; i.e., no dry fuel storage, etc?
And the anti-nukes are still hot for Seabrook too, particularly with the ASR issues that are becoming a point of contention with the extension process. Throw in Duane Arnold, Davis-Besse, Ginna, Indian Point, Oyster Creek (already scheduled for 2019, might be moved up), and Palisades, to name a few.
Yeah, I'm guessing the luddites might be happy at first, that following winter in those areas might make them rethink a bit.
Sadly, this administration isn't exactly helping the issue by trying to shut down coal plants, and gas plants, while it is cheap for now, simply put too much volatility into the market. You as well as a lot of people know how thin a margin it can be to rely on just one source for your energy.