Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio honeypot

Author Topic: Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio  (Read 8299 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

wiesner1

  • Guest
Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio
« on: Jul 10, 2014, 10:57 »
Hi--I am looking for some clarification. Why is the alpha:beta/gamma ratio important? Specifically, why is this ratio used in the new EPRI alpha monitoring guidelines instead of simply using alpha contamination levels to determine controls. I have yet to get a good answer on this.

It seems to me that the ratio is important in predicting what alpha levels might be based on the amount of beta/gamma. I can see that. I can see it for predicting intakes of alpha if you know what the beta/gamma ratio is. But I don't get the controls part that of the "Level 1, 2, 3" classification. Concerning beta/gamma decay on lets say, some piece of equipment that has both alpha and beta/gamma contamination--why would my controls increase simply because the beta/gamma has decayed away. The same amount of alpha is present; it has not increased. Why would I use stricter controls just because the beta gamma has decayed away and the alpha level is the same as it always was.

Thanks for any clarification.

Offline hamsamich

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1454
  • Karma: 1358
  • Gender: Male
  • And did I hear a 9er in there?
Re: Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio
« Reply #1 on: Jul 10, 2014, 12:02 »
We discussed this at the last plant I was at that has more Alpha 3 areas than most plants and the EPRI guidelines aren't perfect is what we came up with.  Nobody had a better answer than that as far as I can see.  Plants that have very little alpha probably won't even know what you are talking about.  If I remember correctly alpha had to be at least 200 or 2000 (can't remember which) no matter what the ratio was for the stricter controls to be implemented.  They actually had a different control that should almost be called "alpha 4" when the ratio goes lower than 50.  I don't know if that was in the EPRI guidelines but no matter what the ratio was you always had to have at least 200 or 2000 dpm alpha.  Sorry I can't tell you more but some of the supervisors at my last plant did discuss what you are referring to.  So for the stricter control you would have to have a ratio below 50 AND at least 200/2000 dpm.  Seems to me 200/2000 dpm by itself should be high enough if 50 and 200/2000 is.    It has to do with the sensitivity of dealing with Alpha in an industry where it isn't the normal focus maybe.  .02$

Offline bigred

  • Lurker
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio
« Reply #2 on: Jul 11, 2014, 10:58 »
I DONT THINK GETTING MORE STRICT WOULD BENEFIT THEN. -K
The BigRed

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5490
  • Karma: 2523
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio
« Reply #3 on: Jul 11, 2014, 11:17 »
Hi--I am looking for some clarification.....

Ratios between beta-gamma and alpha are significant to derived dose.

Here's a good read:

http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0833/ML083300646.pdf

It is 57 pages long, so take a couple of hours to digest it, take reference notes, and between the linked paper and the nine references in the linked paper you will understand and you will have your good answer.

Enjoy.

almost forgot - provided we are looking for a good answer within an operating nuclear power plant
« Last Edit: Jul 11, 2014, 11:19 by GLW »

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

Offline Piggyback Beta

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: 9
Re: Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio
« Reply #4 on: Jul 14, 2014, 07:51 »
"Concerning beta/gamma decay on lets say, some piece of equipment that has both alpha and beta/gamma contamination--why would my controls increase simply because the beta/gamma has decayed away. The same amount of alpha is present; it has not increased."

Ingrowth.   If fission products are present, the cobalt 60 goes away, and the Pu-238, and Pu 240 increases.  Pu-241 (14 year half life) feeds the Am-241.  Look at Table B-2 in the new guidelines for clarification

With low beta/gamma the tendency is to decrease controls, which can fool the HP.  The controls should either stay the same or increase.  Old 'level 3' plants with high alpha have very high airborne levels for alpha.  The particle size will decrease due to recoil making it harder to control with ventilation and other 'normal' controls.   

Some of the 1970's plants are just reaching the point of ingrowth on abandoned systems.

wiesner1

  • Guest
Re: Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio
« Reply #5 on: Jul 14, 2014, 10:51 »
Thanks for the replies. GLW--I'm going to read up and then I will ask you and Piggy Back questions later! I appreciate your help. I'm still listening too--for anybody who wants to elaborate further.

wiesner1

  • Guest
Re: Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio
« Reply #6 on: Jul 14, 2014, 12:04 »
The appendix doesn't print. Well, it prints but the information has been withheld by EPRI. Every subject heading is followed by "Content deleted-EPRI Proprietary Information." But I'm sure somebody here at the plant has it.

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5490
  • Karma: 2523
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio
« Reply #7 on: Jul 14, 2014, 12:52 »
The appendix doesn't print. Well, it prints but the information has been withheld by EPRI. Every subject heading is followed by "Content deleted-EPRI Proprietary Information." But I'm sure somebody here at the plant has it.

ergo:

almost forgot - provided we are looking for a good answer within an operating nuclear power plant

ETD!!!!!!

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

Offline UncaBuffalo

  • Mostly Retired
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
  • Karma: 4598
  • "How Many Things I Have No Need Of" - Socrates
Re: Alpha to Beta/Gamma ratio
« Reply #8 on: Oct 28, 2022, 10:56 »
Ratios between beta-gamma and alpha are significant to derived dose.

Here's a good read:

http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0833/ML083300646.pdf

It is 57 pages long, so take a couple of hours to digest it, take reference notes, and between the linked paper and the nine references in the linked paper you will understand and you will have your good answer.

Enjoy.

almost forgot - provided we are looking for a good answer within an operating nuclear power plant

Thanks!
We are plain quiet folk and have no use for adventures. Nasty disturbing uncomfortable things! Make you late for dinner! I can’t think what anybody sees in them.      - B. Baggins

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?