The only disturbing thing to me is the part where they ask you your race on the questionaire.
At DC Cook, I simply refused to give an answer. The guy in badging told me I had to answer. I told him that I didn't HAVE to do anything, and he could give me the badge or not.
He gave me the badge.
At Monticello, I answered "C". I assume that the screener understood this to mean "Caucaisian". In reality, it simply meant "C", and I intended to say so if asked.
Here's the thing: There is in all actuality no such thing as "race". All human beings belong to the same species. Our DNA is unique to each individual person (except identical twins). Likewise, skin color, hair texture, eye color, thickness of lips, shape of eyes, broadness of nose, stature...etc. are not exclusive to any one "race", nor are they uniformly common among any single "race".
Attempts to identify a person's ethnicity by DNA and statistics is essentially flawed because all the participants in the control group are "self-identified". That is; somebody took a sample and asked them what group they belonged to.
Now, I can give a sample and say that I am a Native American. Technically, this is true since I was born on one of the American continents. I am not to my knowledge a descendant of any of the aboriginal tribes of America, known commonly as Indians. But, I could say that I was and nobody could definitively prove me wrong.
I could just as easily say that I am African American, Asian, Hispanic, or anything else I want. Who can say that I'm wrong?
In my opinion, they have no need for this information. They can't use it to identify me, so what can they use it for without breaking the law?
Here's a trick; ask Mariah Carey what "race" she belongs to. Being adopted, I bet she doesn't even know. Her physical characteristics (other than being totally FINE) could place her in any one or more racial groups. Be careful about making an assumption. You could be wrong. An Irish name does not guarantee Irish ancestry.