Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu 5 Energy Trends to Watch in 2016

Author Topic: 5 Energy Trends to Watch in 2016  (Read 2493 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17147
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
5 Energy Trends to Watch in 2016
« on: Dec 31, 2015, 12:13 »
5 Energy Trends to Watch in 2016

4). Tentative return of nuclear: Following the nuclear disaster in Japan in 2011, countries stalled the development of new nuclear plants, and closed down aging plants outright. But now Japan, the U.S., and some countries in Europe, are taking another look at new nuclear.

The power generation technology is unique in that it provides a large amount of power, around the clock, but doesn’t have carbon emissions. Environmentalists are increasingly beginning to stand behind nuclear for just that reason.

Some of the environmental concerns—like what to do with nuclear waste—are being addressed by a handful of new startups that are experimenting with new reactor designs and materials. Many of these technologies will be deployed outside of the U.S. and Europe first, in countries like China. China could become the world’s biggest nuclear energy provider by 2030.

http://fortune.com/2015/12/30/5-trends-energy-2016/

Offline Bonds 25

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Karma: 151
  • Gender: Male
  • HP Tech......Well Thats My Title Anyways.
Re: 5 Energy Trends to Watch in 2016
« Reply #1 on: Dec 31, 2015, 11:21 »
"Nuclear disaster"

Really? Natural disaster.....yes. Nuclear......no. Many more people have died putting up solar panels than lives lost because of Fukushima (zero)

How can something be considered a "Disaster" when it hasn't killed or directly injured a single person?
"But I Dont Wanna Be A Pirate" - Jerry Seinfeld

Offline Higgs

  • SRO
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • Karma: 1284
  • Gender: Male
  • Life has a melody...
Re: 5 Energy Trends to Watch in 2016
« Reply #2 on: Jan 01, 2016, 03:06 »
"Nuclear disaster"

Really? Natural disaster.....yes. Nuclear......no. Many more people have died putting up solar panels than lives lost because of Fukushima (zero)

How can something be considered a "Disaster" when it hasn't killed or directly injured a single person?

Only when you're spinning an anti nuclear narrative.

The "disaster" displayed just how robust the technology is, and how fallible humans are.

Justin
"How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic.” - Ted Nugent

Offline Bonds 25

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
  • Karma: 151
  • Gender: Male
  • HP Tech......Well Thats My Title Anyways.
Re: 5 Energy Trends to Watch in 2016
« Reply #3 on: Jan 01, 2016, 08:58 »


The "disaster" displayed just how robust the technology is, and how fallible humans are.

Justin

And how much of a bitch Mother Nature can be.....
"But I Dont Wanna Be A Pirate" - Jerry Seinfeld

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?