Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker Menu Radiation Hormesis... Let's get controversial!


What do you think about Radiation Hormesis? (Info about it below)

Yes, I believe in it.
10 (66.7%)
Sounds plausible.
4 (26.7%)
Hmm... I'm kind of torn / I really don't care.
1 (6.7%)
Doesn't sound plausible.
0 (0%)
It is stupid.
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 12

Author Topic: Radiation Hormesis... Let's get controversial!  (Read 8726 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


  • Guest
Re: Radiation Hormesis... Let's get controversial!
« Reply #25 on: Dec 21, 2016, 07:08 »
I used the 50G/yr dose for the Belt. Shielding for vacay in ray array would be calculated for whatever effect desired.
Still seems a bit extreme for hormesis.

Offline SloGlo

  • meter reader
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 5757
  • Total likes: 186
  • Karma: 2641
  • Gender: Male
  • trust me, i'm an hp
Re: Radiation Hormesis... Let's get controversial!
« Reply #26 on: Dec 21, 2016, 10:25 »
it makes cents two build you're home from stones oar concrete stead of would too git the most hormesis bang fore yore dollars n scents.
« Last Edit: Dec 21, 2016, 10:25 by SloGlo »
quando omni flunkus moritati

dubble eye, dubble yew, dubble aye!

dew the best ya kin, wit watt ya have, ware yinze are!


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of ™, LLC © 1996-2021 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?