Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Making renewable power more viable for the grid

Author Topic: Making renewable power more viable for the grid  (Read 2042 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17156
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!

TVA

  • Guest
Re: Making renewable power more viable for the grid
« Reply #1 on: Oct 12, 2017, 01:07 »
Can't be. Ever.

Chimera

  • Guest
Re: Making renewable power more viable for the grid
« Reply #2 on: Oct 13, 2017, 01:09 »
One thing that never seems to be brought up in discussions of these supposedly "green" projects is the long-term consequences of the waste products produced - during manufacture, operation, and, eventually, decommissioning.  Fly ash is just as big a problem, long term, as spent fuel.  What do you do with it?  The same questions need to be applied to the byproducts of solar and wind manufacturing, use, and disposal.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17156
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: Making renewable power more viable for the grid
« Reply #3 on: Oct 13, 2017, 01:35 »
One thing that never seems to be brought up in discussions of these supposedly "green" projects is the long-term consequences of the waste products produced - during manufacture, operation, and, eventually, decommissioning.  Fly ash is just as big a problem, long term, as spent fuel.  What do you do with it?  The same questions need to be applied to the byproducts of solar and wind manufacturing, use, and disposal.

 +K

I've read a number of articles on this and it may or may not be solvable. Heavy metals in our environment to a large degree come from discarded electronics even with current recycling efforts.

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5493
  • Karma: 2523
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: Making renewable power more viable for the grid
« Reply #4 on: Oct 13, 2017, 01:39 »
One thing that never seems to be brought up in discussions of these supposedly "green" projects is the long-term consequences of the waste products produced - during manufacture, operation, and, eventually, decommissioning.  Fly ash is just as big a problem, long term, as spent fuel.  What do you do with it?  The same questions need to be applied to the byproducts of solar and wind manufacturing, use, and disposal.

There are several all inclusive comparisons, google the appropriate key words and start reading,...

the results are inconvenient truths, and so the green cheerleaders adopt a position that eventually these downsides will work themselves out,...

kinda like the spent fuel "challenges" from 30 years ago,...

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?