Which makes it even worse. Now I question all of their articles. If this one is completely bogus, how can I trust the rest?
“If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed.”
― Mark Twain
I may be stepping over the line a bit into PolySci but the article has no facts to support the title and draws conclusions from suppositions, something I see in political debate all the time. Start with an assumption and make the story fit it. Because radiation is known to cause mutations and the wolves travel long distances you may be spreading mutation beyond the Chernobyl area suppositions that insinuate a fact.
