0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I may be wrong, but I believe that the fossil fuel lobby is much stronger than nuclear in PA. PA doesn't have any prime ocean front property, so maybe they don't believe that they will be impacted by rising sea levels. Unfortunately there are many more consequences to global warming. Temperature is the measure of internal energy in matter. Warmer air and warmer water means more energy. What is the mass of the air ans water that is affected, and how much more energy is stored therein?
The sky is not falling, the ocean is rising.
I'd say it's time to return to topic, transfer to Poli-Sci, or let the thread die....
NUCLEAR POWERS PENNSYLVANIAhttps://www.nuclearpowerspennsylvania.com/https://p2a.co/VLG0OI7%20
Bump
Do not transfer to PoliSci.That takes it out of the public venue. This is the type of information which needs public dissemination.
Not exactly sure what you mean. If it is the nuclear side of this thread no it does not belong in PolySCi but the Global Warming Climate Change for the most part does. I suppose you could argue that it does as CO2 and Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) are at the heart of the debate for continuation of nuclear power but in my view as AGW is a contentious topic that evokes responses that belong in a forum that has less restrictive rules to promote debate. "That's just my opinion I could be wrong." Denis Miller
Send this link to all your State Representatives, Senators, and the Govenor to keep the last six units on line.https://dailyenergyinsider.com/news/19647-new-international-energy-agency-report-highlights-impacts-of-decline-in-use-of-nuclear-power/
Last 6 units?