Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?

Author Topic: Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?  (Read 1060 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17156
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?


https://theglobepost.com/2019/12/16/nuclear-energy-climate-change/

TVA

  • Guest
Re: Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?
« Reply #1 on: Dec 20, 2019, 06:43 »
Which plants have closed prematurely?

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17156
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?
« Reply #2 on: Dec 20, 2019, 07:22 »
Which plants have closed prematurely?

Seriously??? We have plants being extended to 80 years and some closed prior to the anticipated lifespan. Due to economics but still premature. Shoreham never came on line.


 ::)   :old:


 [coffee]


TVA

  • Guest
Re: Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?
« Reply #3 on: Dec 20, 2019, 08:22 »
Shoreham should never have been built.

Name a plant decommissioned prior to its 40 year license expiring

TVA

  • Guest
Re: Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?
« Reply #4 on: Dec 20, 2019, 08:28 »
Dont say Crystal River. Stupidity broke that plant

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17156
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?
« Reply #5 on: Dec 20, 2019, 10:36 »
Shoreham should never have been built.

Name a plant decommissioned prior to its 40 year license expiring

Shoreham, Rancho Seco, TMI, and why just at the 40 year mark when we are starting to extend to 80 years nice metric but not really relevant.
« Last Edit: Dec 20, 2019, 10:41 by Marlin »

TVA

  • Guest
Re: Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?
« Reply #6 on: Dec 20, 2019, 10:38 »
Never had a full power license. Fact is you can’t

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17156
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?
« Reply #7 on: Dec 20, 2019, 10:42 »
Never had a full power license. Fact is you can’t

So you are right based on your metric that only shutdowns prior to 40 count. So there is a 5% license and then a 40 year license not just permission to exceed 5%? I always thought there was a two step license for construction and one operation.
« Last Edit: Dec 20, 2019, 11:06 by Marlin »

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17156
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: Should Nuclear Energy be Part of Climate Solutions?
« Reply #8 on: Dec 20, 2019, 11:18 »
Check out Zion 1 and 2 and there are a few more on the list, didn't take long to find this.

Nuclear Reactor Shutdown List

https://www.eia.gov/nuclear/reactors/shutdown/

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?