Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu setting scintillator frisker 43-92 with model 3277/1 alarm  

Author Topic: setting scintillator frisker 43-92 with model 3277/1 alarm  (Read 578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gracie J

  • Lurker
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: 0
  • Gender: Female
  • Tell Recruiters to use NukeWorker.com
I'm trying to convert what would be equivalent to 0.4bq into CPS on the Ludlum 3277/1 with 43-92 scintillator that has an efficiency of 25.5%..

everyone around me is getting differing answers,

the calibration unit has set the alarm to 10CPS but I don't think this is correct? can someone break this down for me?

Source: Pu-239, 4337
Activity: 30972.44 dpm

Meter reading: 7960,7873,7780
count time: 1 min
Distance source to detector: surface

average efficiency 25.5% 4pi

?? would an alarm at 10CPS be equivalent to 0.4Bq?

Offline bigjoemonger

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • Karma: 0
Pu-239 is a straight alpha emitter, emitting one alpha per decay. So should be a 1 to 1 relationship for a standard efficiency conversion.
Average meter reading of 7871 cpm?
Average 4pi efficiency of 0.255

7871 / 0.255 = 30,867 dpm.

You state an activity of 30,972.44 dpm

That's a difference of 0.3% so I'd say your calibration is pretty spot on.

Knowing that you can apply the same logic to your alarm setpoint.

10 cps / 0.255 = 39.2 dps

If you're trying to set the alarm setpoint at 0.4 Bq = 0.4 dps then you'd do
0.4 * 0.255 = 0.102 cps

I dont think that instrument is capable of setting an alarm setpoint that low, is it?

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?