I'm In!

[LHef22]

 

I am so excited, I just wanted to share.  I am officially in the Navy Nuke program as of today!  I am shipping to basic on March 1 and can't wait to get going!  I am looking forward to all of the hard work ahead.

[johnigma]

Awesome!

Keep your head up and remember, boot camp is NOT the Navy.

[cave_dog42]

welcome to the dep program, good luck in nuke school and the fleet

[taterhead]

Good for you.

Nothing we type here will prepare you for what will begin for you in 6 weeks.

Keep your head up, and enjoy the heck out out of your last 6 weeks of civilian life for a while.

[Adidas2806]

i shipped out to boot camp on november 8th and graduated bootcamp on jan 7th, on the 9th i was here at nuke school.the first two weeks are the worst of boot camp, otherwise known as "p" days. you will say to yourself, "what the hell have i gotten myself into..?"  after those first two weeks bootcamp actually gets kind of fun, i enjoyed the last half of it. boot camp is what you make of it, was alot easier than i thought it was going to be.

im actually surprised you just enlisted and your ship date is march. i enlisted in feb and couldnt ship out untill november. you got lucky there that you didnt have to wait so freaking long as i did. take advantage of this site, go through all the threads. when i first depped in i think i asked these people every question i could think of, they were all a big help. alot of your questions can be found somewhere in here, and if not then ask and somebody will know the answer!

Im finally here though, and what a relief it is. very very glad that i have chosen this route! congrats on making this decision and will see ya in a few months in sc!
Sean

[LHef22]

Yeah I got really lucky to get a ship date so soon.  My original ship date was June, and that still was not soon enough for me.  I wouldn't be able to wait as long as you had to.  I bet it sucked being there Nov - Jan. 

I am definately preparing myself for boot camp.  I've heard the P day horror stories.  I can't wait though.

This site has definately answered some questions that I have already.  Every one seems to be very nice and helpful.  I really don't know what to expect though.  The people I talked to about the program made it sound like the NAPT test was hard, the hardest tests they have ever taken.  It was easy for me after I cleared out the cobwebs.  It's been about 6 years since I've taken chemistry, physics and calc. 

[Flooznie]

Grats on getting into the program!  Remember, getting in the program is the easy part.  Staying in and being successful is the hardest part of all this.  Remember to give every aspect of this program 200%.  If your heart isn't into it, it will crush you, trust me.  You are going to have to want it more than anything you've ever wanted in your life.  Above all else, remember your integrity is what makes or breaks you as a nuc.  Your integrity must be impeccable.  The next 6 years ahead will drastically change your life.  By the way, how much are they offering you guys for bonuses nowadays?

ET1 (SS)
NNPS 9802

[LHef22]

 

Thank you!  Right now the enlistment bonus for Nuke is $12,000 and after all schooling is done, I have the option to sign up for an additional 6 years with a re-enlistment bonus of $60,000, or if I wait until my initial 6 years is up, the re-enlistment bonus is $100,000.

[ex-SSN585]

The people I talked to about the program made it sound like the NAPT test was hard, the hardest tests they have ever taken.

Of course, many of the people probably only had the benefit of high school.

If the NAPT is anything in content like the previous version, the NFQT, it was not difficult.  The NFQT was multiple choice and easy to grade for the enlisted classifiers (the "job counselors" at MEPS).

My inclination would be to advise you to forget about your score.  It's one of those things that (almost) everyone remembers and lots of people will want to compare.

Just apply those study habits you developed in college.  I remember the top student in my section 11 NPS class (when the sections were grouped into people with similar aptitudes).  He only put in enough time to complete the homework, never stayed to study (except for the last week when everyone was given mandatory study hours), and always got the top score in the section.  After NPS, the next time I met him was out in the fleet.  He was still a second class (which he might have gotten by reenlisting STAR or may have been demoted to).  I had not gotten second class by automatic or command advancement, but had still been a first class for at least a couple of years.  Perhaps everything came easy to him and he did not apply himself.

Yes, I thought the "nuke test" was easy and NPS was easy.  But part of it is not only learning the material, but learning the Navy way of approaching the material.  That will be more evident in the prototype, hands-on, part of the training, where the the person who is used to relying on a good memory can find him or herself in trouble.  Nuke school is competitive.  I probably logged at least as many voluntary study hours as those in the lowest section and I still could not reach the same level as that top student who did his homework during class and went home to his wife right after school.  That's a bit extreme and most successful people have a more balanced approach to life.  Just maintain good study habits and turn them into good and effective work habits in the fleet.

So, don't form an impression by your experience with the NAPT and what you've heard from others.  There are a lot of smart people in the Navy Nuclear program who have all passed the NAPT, whether or not they thought it was hard.  (Yes, to be accurate, some did not have to take the NAPT.)

Just treat NPS as a new and challenging experience!

[ex-SSN585]

8)I have the option to sign up for an additional 6 years with a re-enlistment bonus of $60,000, or if I wait until my initial 6 years is up, the re-enlistment bonus is $100,000.

If the program works the same way as it used to, you have enlisted for four years with a mandatory two year extension for schooling.  I would guess that the additional six years you mentioned is a reenlistment after your first two years, at which time the Navy agrees to void your initial contract and write a new one for a six year commitment.

Of course, you will have to verify this with your command career counselor, since my information is over ten years old.  You have another option in the case you complete your two years, money is not your primary concern, and you are still unsure whether you enjoy the Nuclear Navy.  If you decide to reenlist around the four year point, the Navy used to agree to throw away your extension and write a new contract (generally four or six years).  One of the factors in determining the size of your bonus is the length of the contract.  Another is a "multiple" which is a reflection of how badly the Navy needs your particular rating and specialty (it could be different for ET, EM, MM, and ELT).

You don't need to be worried about this now, but if you decide to reenlist, make sure you are aware of "Zones".  I believe there are three times you can get a reenlistment bonus, corresponding to Zones A, B, and C.  To get all the benefits of reenlistment, you must be within the proper zone, or interval of years.  Normally, this is something you don't need to worry about, but it can be a killer if for some reason, you don't execute a standard four or six year contract or if you sign some strange extension.)

Not to disagree with anything that has been said, this is just to point out that you might have other options.

[LHef22]

I agree and I will cross that bridge when I get to it.  The recruiters like to throw the money at you, but I didn't sugn up just for the money.  I'm not letting the $$ blind me.

[dav8]

8)I have the option to sign up for an additional 6 years with a re-enlistment bonus of $60,000, or if I wait until my initial 6 years is up, the re-enlistment bonus is $100,000.

Zone A is $45,000, Zone B is $60000, Zone C is $100000.
So you can reenlist for $45K your first reenlistment, $60K your second, and $100K on your third, which would bring you out to around 14-16 years in.  If it were $60 then $100, there would be a bunch of people reenlisting twice then getting out.

[taterhead]

All of that is putting the cart before the horse.

The bonuses are there, and the figures listed are the caps for each zone.

You'll hear enough about that once you're in NPS.

[shayne]

You could also make the best of your time in the Navy and get out after 6 and make $60,000 easy your first year out.

[matthewmiller01]

You could also make the best of your time in the Navy and get out after 6 and make $60,000 easy your first year out.

At a MINIMUM!!!

[ODiesel]

It is true that there is a lot of money to be made once you leave the navy, but dont think that while you are in that you live a life of poverty. Once you qualify at prototype and start getting special duty pay and sub pay on top of BAH and BAS, your paychecks are a lot higher. My third year in the Navy I made over $60,000. Not too bad for a 21 year old with no college education!!

[WXMel]

My boyfriend graduates boot this coming Friday (28th) and will be in South Carolina that Sunday after.  I know the Nuke program is demanding from what I've heard.  I'm a meteorology student at Oklahoma and our program is so demanding that we typcially start out with around 150-175 and only about 30-40 of those make it through the program.  What are the statistics like for the Nuke program?  How many people get accepted versus how many actually make it through?  What makes the Nuke program so hard?  Is it moreso the amount of work, or is it the difficulty of the material?  What are some good tips to help ensure success getting through the program?

[ex-SSN585]

From reading other posts on this forum, it looks like the Navy attempts to graduate as many students as possible and civil/drug involvement is the most likely reason for not completing the training program.  Historically, the Navy nuclear program had a relatively high attrition rate, but recently the attitude toward students has changed.

The Navy nuclear program cannot be exceedingly difficult because it has to be taught at the level that a high school graduate, without college-level or advanced placement classes, can reasonable handle.  Also, while a college might teach at the level of the average student in the class, Navy training is typically geared toward the students with the least aptitude.

The Navy nuclear program is challenging because the amount of material and the pace at which it is taught in a limited amount of time.  Also, thinking out of the box is not encouraged, so even if some of the material is familiar, it must be learned in the way in which the Navy wants to present it.

My primary tip is to maintain good study habits.  It is possible for a student to do all his/her homework in class and go home at the end of the day with no additional study time and finish at the top of his section.  However, in the long run, such a student might not make a good operator, and his/her career will suffer. 

My secondary recommendation probably does not apply as much with nuclear power school than with nuclear training in general.  That is to study the source documents.  Do not rely as much on what you have been told (particularly by other students  ... of course, information from experienced instructors is generally reliable) as what you have read in the governing documents.  And, it is not necessary (and can be bad) to memorize every detail, but to know where to quickly find the information.

[LHef22]

Ok.  That's what I've been looking for!  Thank you ex-SSN585.  So even though I have taken calculus and chemistry in college, they are going to teach it to me like I'm back in high school and I will have to keep my mouth shut with how I now it and learn it the Navy way!

[ex-SSN585]

My secondary recommendation probably does not apply as much with nuclear power school than with nuclear training in general.  That is to study the source documents.  Do not rely as much on what you have been told (particularly by other students  ... of course, information from experienced instructors is generally reliable) as what you have read in the governing documents.  And, it is not necessary (and can be bad) to memorize every detail, but to know where to quickly find the information.

I'm going to change my opinion on this point.  Since I have read that in prototype, much of the checkout is performed using a computer, I would rely heavily on what is taught in classroom, because the instructors probably teach the material so that the students know what to expect.  Also, students who have completed the checkout will know what the computer is looking for. That is, the computer will follow a single, rigid interpretation.  (I wonder how this compares with the way in which MM "A" school was taught 25 years ago, with self paced instruction.  I seem to remember using computers for checkouts back then.)

(However, when a person gets to the fleet, I believe the original post has the best way to learn how the plant works, along with tracing the system to see how the system diagram compares with the actual plant installation ... with the exception of the ET/RO systems.)

[ex-SSN585]

Ok.  That's what I've been looking for!  Thank you ex-SSN585.  So even though I have taken calculus and chemistry in college, they are going to teach it to me like I'm back in high school and I will have to keep my mouth shut with how I now it and learn it the Navy way!

In my opinion, what I have said is true.  But I'm a bit slow and have just thought of some other factors.

Years and years ago, nuclear MMs, EMs, and ETs were taught the same material as conventional MMs, EMs, and ETs.  MMs were particularly short-changed.  Now the schools are longer and the nukes ares separate, so the average aptitude of the students during nuclear rate training is higher.  At that time, everything had to be taught or retaught in the 26 weeks of NPS.

I have no idea what the curricula are now.  I'm speculating that, since there is more time to learn the in-rate material the Nuclear-Navy-way, less has to be crammed into NPS and perhaps there has been some redistribution to concentrate on cross-rate training and nuclear reactor theory/operations (rather than in-rate knowledge).  I seriously doubt that the Navy has found it necessary to increase the level and depth of knowledge required, and the change to teach all nuclear personnel at the same training site would seem to favor the students.  Then again, part of the nuclear training process is to put the students under some stress to ensure they can handle it, so things might not have changed much.

In other words, in my posts I have ASS-U-ME-D quite a bit based on what I have heard and on my own dated experience, and we all know what that might mean.  (But the point about starting at the high school level cannot have changed, based on the minimum academic requirements to enter the nuclear field program.)

[Adidas2806]

I just finished Indoc here at NNPTC, and there are always people that think the attrition rate is somewhere around 30 percent. That is not true, the attrition rate for 2004 was 4.3%(Due to academic failure. This does not include the students kicked out due to drugs/alchohol.) Very few students ever fail because of academic failure.

[Roll Tide]

 (I wonder how this compares with the way in which MM "A" school was taught 25 years ago, with self paced instruction.  I seem to remember using computers for checkouts back then.)

They probably aren't using punch-cards.....
 

[ODiesel]

I am an instructor at NPTU Charleston. It's true, we do use computers for a portion of checkouts. When student's report to prototype they have no idea how to qualify, what to study or what types of questions are asked during a checkout. The computers have lessons that discuss the various plant systems and their operation. Once a student has studied up on a system and feels ready for the checkout they take a CAC(Computer Aided Checkout), if they pass the CAC they print out a report with a barcode and bring it to a staff member to recieve the oral checkout. This is only done on system checkouts and does two things: First, it makes sure a student knows something before taking up an instructors time. Second, it allows us to track the students' weaknesses by showing us which questions are frequently missed so we can train on those topics harder. Its really a valuable tool.

[shayne]

This is how it was at S8G when I was leaving 3 years ago.  They had just started it and was still working out the bugsl.

I am an instructor at NPTU Charleston. It's true, we do use computers for a portion of checkouts. When student's report to prototype they have no idea how to qualify, what to study or what types of questions are asked during a checkout. The computers have lessons that discuss the various plant systems and their operation. Once a student has studied up on a system and feels ready for the checkout they take a CAC(Computer Aided Checkout), if they pass the CAC they print out a report with a barcode and bring it to a staff member to recieve the oral checkout. This is only done on system checkouts and does two things: First, it makes sure a student knows something before taking up an instructors time. Second, it allows us to track the students' weaknesses by showing us which questions are frequently missed so we can train on those topics harder. Its really a valuable tool.

[Steel Shark]

I know the Nuke program is demanding from what I've heard.  I'm a meteorology student at Oklahoma and our program is so demanding that we typcially start out with around 150-175 and only about 30-40 of those make it through the program.  What are the statistics like for the Nuke program?  How many people get accepted versus how many actually make it through?  What makes the Nuke program so hard?  Is it moreso the amount of work, or is it the difficulty of the material?  What are some good tips to help ensure success getting through the program?

WXMel,

Some of this is already discussed above.  As I perused through the thread, I noted a lot of questions and a couple of answers that recent policy has changed.  Please keep in mind throughout this response that I believe the Navy Nuclear Power pipeline is a great career start for intelligent hardworking young folkes, but I'm not a recruiter (to each his/her own).   

Just out of curiousity, what rate is your boyfriend?   

The best way to make it through is certainly noted in the thread ... hard work.  The program used to have statistics of 33-50% attrition.  No more. As Adidas noted, it is now around 10% with academics less than 5%.   If you want to make it through, you will.  The majority of the losses now are drugs, underage drinking (repeated offenses which leads to your reliability to operate a nuclear reactor, and the inability to obtain a clearance due to debt, pre-service offenses, etc.).  Very few drops due to academics (most of these are realistically lack of motivation).   

The schools today are nothing like what they were when most of us went through.  The MM A school is everythng from Valve Operations to Air Compressors to Plant Thermodynamics to Quality Assurance.  EMs are now almost identical to ETs in that they are taught Basic Electricity, Electronics and Microprocessor Theory.  The EMs are then forked off to Power Generation topics, while the ETs continue off with more advanced Microprocessor Instrumentation and Control topics.   

The curriculum has changed to Computer Aided Instruction and Structured Notes.  No more of the instructor writing as fast as he/she can for an hour while students write as fast as they can.  Now, instructors have time to teach.  The average to pass on to Nuke School from A school was adjusted to 2.50 (62.5%) to make it more reasonable.  As an aside, as someone noted above, often those students who barely make it through the school are the biggest successes in the fleet (my opinion only).   

Someone also mentioned SRBs above.  Zone A, B and C still exist.  But zone C has also been added into a supervisory enlistment bonus and probably in October of this year Zone D will be added to this program.  I have attached the NAVADMIN at the bottom.  That of course is written in Navy lingo, so any questions, please post and someone will answer.  SRB currently ends at 16 years, but the supervisory bonus will extend to at least 20 years of service and maybe more.  Now keep in mind, the reason the Navy is willing to pay those bonuses, is that we are in a highly competitive hiring field.  The civilian work force wants you too! (which is why I stated earlier I believe the pipeline is a great thing for the younger work force).   

http://www.bupers.navy.mil/navadmin/_vti_bin/navadmin-search.html0.idq

I taught at Nuke Field A School about 3 years ago (Digital and Microprocessor Theory) and then served as the ET Class Director.  Many of us thought of the program as a dinosaur that would never change.  When Admiral Bowman came in, things changed.

For you/boyfriend or Adidas or LHef, I'm one of those old giesers about to retire.  I am attached to the USS Portsmouth as the EDMC which is also about to retire.  So, if you have questions or concerns, I have left my e-mail addy open.  (You can guarantee neither you nor your significant other will ever be attached to my command) and btw, I don't get offended easily.

Have a great Navy day.  ;') Charlie (ETCM(SS))

[shayne]

Thanks for the update.  I only saw the beginning of changes when I separated from the Navy in Sep 2001.

[rysics]

Wow...4.3% attrition???  Class 9007 (when it was still in Orlando) had a 65% + attrition rate from "A" school through Prototype.  I have heard that the school had changed emphasis.  Can any of the recent graduates let me know if you really get your notes printed for you...we had to hand write them all, my penmenship still sucks from it (heh).

DoD Civilian RCT (better pay without the underway)

Have a great time while you're there...bootcamp was fun for the last half (someone else had a similiar experience), MM "A" school was fairly fun, NNPS was long, Prototype was a blast...3 weeks before we were done we had a party...got caught....class 9007 section 4 both S5G and A1W groups were almost de-nuked enmass...yep it was fun as hell.

[newnavynuke]

Hey everyone!  I have just gotten into the Navy's nuke program, and will be going to boot camp in Illinois on the 25th of April.  I'm sure the question I'm about to ask will be seen as menial and has probably been answered in other threads that I just haven't gotten to yet.....but.....what kind of things would all of you ex and current Navy nukes suggest for demeanor dearing basic and study material before A school and NPS.  I've heard conflicting things about basic.  Some people say that nukes tend to get a smarty pants rep and are often crew leaders and stuff, and others say that there's no difference, some people say do this or that, but you've been there....set me straight please!!!  Also, I'm fairly sharp and only a few hours away from having a double Bachelors in Political Science and Physics, so near as much about the difficulty level of the information at the different nuke schools, but I know it will be difficult, and would absolutely love to get some insight as to what to brush up on.  I've been reading through other threads and it's obvious that you guys know your metaphorical sh** so I thank you for your help in advance.



Thanks again,
Bryan S.

[Already Gone]

Hi Bryan,
You're not going to have time to study at RTC.  As far as demeanor goes, forget about how smart you are.  The WHOLE POINT of recruit training is to do as you are told.  Don't over think it.  Just do it.
If you have innate intelligence - which is evident by the fact that you have been accepted int o the nuke program - it will show on its own.  If there is some way that this can be useful in the operation of your recruit company, your company commander will put you in a leadership position.  But, don't fret if leadership roles are given to seemingly less intelligent men.  The recruit CPO and platoon leaders don't always have to be the smartest guys... they just have to get the company out of the rack and into the chow line on time.  Something as simple as having a booming voice may be their only qualification for the job.  That's all okay.  Even though you will be a "Seaman Recruit", you will still be getting paid more than those guys, and the leadership roles come with responsibilities that are not necessarily compensated.
Remember, your job is to follow instructions.  You may find it harder to follow than to lead, but do what they tell you anyway.

During RTC, you won't need anything that they don't give you.  You have no other responsibility, and no other life for those weeks.  So, it's all just a kind of a game, isn't it?  Play the game, stay tranquil, and enjoy the ride.  You'll do okay.

[CheeseheadNuke]

Congratulations on being accepted into the nuclear program. When you complete the program (and your tours of duty at sea), you will have accomplished something you will always take pride in. Boot camp is not the nuclear navy. Beer Court is right- remember it is a game and a weeding out process to see who will follow orders- even if the orders seem stupid. If you can't do stuff like fold your skivvies the way they want you to- why should they trust you with a reactor plant? This will become a useful skill in the nuclear world even after your navy career is over. Stupid shit abounds at every nuclear facility known to mankind. Keep a low profile in boot camp. Listen 10 times more than you talk. Don't let others in your company know you're a nuke and nearly a double major college graduate. It may be used against you. Blend into the woodwork. There's plenty of time to shine after bootcamp. It won't do you much good to try to stand out there. Remember it's only for a few weeks, then it's over.

[newnavynuke]

Thanks a Ton!!!!  I really appreciate the input...a friend of mine that just recently went through told me all kinds of other stuff that I thought was BS, but then again his second try ASVAB score of 51 is at least indicative of the fact that he's one of the more dull crayons in the box.  Anyway, I have another question to pick your brains if I may.  What I would really love to do is go through RTC, A school, NPS, and Prototype, then the Nuke Commissioning program, then go to flight school and fly.  I know of a few people that have done it before, but I also know that generally the military is real hesitant to double train.  What do you think my chances are of doing this, and what should I do once I'm in to help get to flight school?  I love all the help...it really eases some apprehension and unclear points I had.

-Bryan

[Fermi2]

Once a nuke, always a nuke, at least 99.9% of the time.

Mike

[newnavynuke]

I would love to start talking with a few people that are going to basic on April 25th, 2005 that way we would know someone upon arriving...we nukes have to stick together! LOL 

-B

[Smitty9000]

If you have a degree are you doing going to boot camp?
My Dad asked me what a Petty Officer was before I went in to the NAV.
Petty=Small and insignificant
Officer=Person in charge.
So do you want be that person?
With a degree go to OCS!
Choose something in the non nuclear field.

[Nuclear NASCAR]

If you have a degree are you doing going to boot camp?

It's possible that he wants to serve his country and receive more education.

My Dad asked me what a Petty Officer was before I went in to the NAV.
Petty=Small and insignificant
Officer=Person in charge.
So do you want be that person?
With a degree go to OCS!
Choose something in the non nuclear field.

I'm of the opinion that there will be more nuclear plants built.  Why not go into it and virtually guarantee yourself a way into the industry?  Not trying to start a flame war, just one possibile set of answers.

[jdvazquez]

I am curently in the Navy DEP, enlisted to be in the nuclear field. Does anyone know the dates or general advice for NFAS, and or the standard shedule after the Pass in Review, receiveing orders and first assignment?

also i have familiy in the Nuke field (curently at CR3 in crystal river, FL) and spured my interest on proposed plans for future plants, job openings, and legislation in progress to allow more plant. any info is appreciated.

[newnavynuke]

I tried to post this before, but it got deleted somehow!     Probably a user=id10t error....haha...  Anyway, I was thinking that it would be cool to meet other prospective nukes that are shipping out on or around April 25th to boot camp.  I figured that since this whole training process from RTC through prototype school is made easier by team work....let's get an early start and meet each other.  It would be cool as hell to get off the plane in IL and already know a few guys to work with.  I look forward to getting yelled at with you!

-Bryan

Oh yeah!  For any non-member that might be reading this, my personal email is Brys123@gmail.com, so feel free to email me there....one person already has.

-B

[jeepgirl1]

If you have a degree are you doing going to boot camp?
My Dad asked me what a Petty Officer was before I went in to the NAV.
Petty=Small and insignificant
Officer=Person in charge.
So do you want be that person?
With a degree go to OCS!
Choose something in the non nuclear field.

If only it were that easy  .  Just because you have a degree doesn't mean that there is a slot waiting for you in OCS.  OCS is EXTREMELY competitive right now.  If you don't have 3.5+ GPA with a technical degree, the officer recruiter pretty much says "thanks for the interest, but your chances are very slim for being accepted".  Additionally, the Navy has an overabundance of junior officers, so much in fact that they've started to "trim the fat" as a part of their force-shaping.       

[MMCIcebergDX]

Well, first off, You will be viewed as a smarty pants, get used to it, but DON'T advertise that you are a Nuke wanna be.
Second, remember navy also stands for Never Again Volunteer Yourself.  Keep your had down when/if they look for volunteers for pin staff (leadership)
Third, DON'T NUKE STUFF OUT!  Nukes as a group, we tend to think too much on some things, and in boot camp, this can be a very bad thing.   
Fourth, just remember that you will be around people from areas you have never been, and some of them will be from the best of the best, and some of them, you will wonder how they are not in jail, or a nuthouse, it takes all kinds to serve in the navy, the goal is to survive, and to not make life any harder on any of you as a group, then is absolutely necessary.
Last, before long you will hear the term F#$kin' Nuke.  Get used to it, be proud of it, and remember that a lot of them could not do it, hold you head up, take the lumps, and DRIVE ON!
 
Good luck, and study hard.

[NukeWife]

I just wanted to say good luck to all those future nukes! The one who started this thread already left I think but good luck to Bryan!  I was a nuke..yes..WAS.  I couldn't hack it.  And there are A LOT of reasons as to why the people who don't make..well...don't.  A lot of my fellow nukes were lost because of doing stupid things like underage drinking..or restriction problems.  I am happy to say that I never had any type of bad conduct marks on my military record. I was never yellow badged..or orange badged (restriction)..I was also great on my military inspections and the like.  I even was awarded the Commander's Personal Excellence Award at my graduation of 'A' school.  Although I sort of wonder if that isn't an 'atta girl-consolation prize' because I almost didn't make it through 'A' school.  There really wasn't anything that would have made me more prepared for Nuke school.  MOST of my instructors were really helpful..some weren't ( and I always wondered if some of them were like that because it was their shore duty... anyone care to comment on that speculation? ).  But I ended up going to Palmetto in my 5th week of Power School.  Really though the two people who got me through that tough time were my husband and my SLPO.  When I was at Palmetto there were 3 other nukes there and my SLPO was the only one who came to visit me every single day.  It was a bit reassuring to not feel like I was only a number to the Navy.. Now I am not here to say that my not completing Nuke school was the programs fault or the Navys fault.  The only thing that I would say is that there is an amount of responsibility on their part for it getting to the point where it did.  I read through some of these posts and see what people who made it through the program are saying to those who are struggling.  The negativity towards them, it just amazes me...As one who didn't make it through, I want to say it isn't easy accepting that.  While I can't speak for everyone who doesn't make it..I know for me that I do feel a lot of disappointment in not making it through Power school.  There is NO test that can be given to determine if you will be successful in Nuke school.  Unless they determine how to test for success.  Sorry for going on and on..but I just wanted those who make it through to be a little more considerate of those who complain about the program and are having difficulties.  You had it tough...I appreciate that..but just because you could handle that...well..times have changed..and I don't think that most youths are conditioned for some of the things that occur in the program.  Good luck to those future "50-50-90"s!!! And if things do get tough for you...TALK TO SOMEONE!!! Talk or yell or scream until SOMEONE listens to you!! And I don't mean your fellow classmates necessarily...I mean your SLPO..an instructor...the chaplain..Someone higher ranking than you!! But stay in your CoC...I don't imagine that the captain would want you barging into his office rioting!  Just tell someone...The sooner you do that...the better chance you have of fixing the problem before its too late!  That was my mistake..I hope and pray that it won't be yours!
Former EM3