Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker Menu

DOE kills decades-old radiation safety standard

Started by Marlin, Yesterday at 09:37

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Marlin

You cannot read the whole article without a subscription. If I can find another article that talks about removing ALARA regulations from the DOE I will post it. 

DOE kills decades-old radiation safety standard

https://www.eenews.net/articles/doe-kills-decades-old-radiation-safety-standard/

Mounder

ALARA has been under attack long before Trump's election. The HPS has been picking at it for a half-dozen years and the most of their HPs are in agreement that there isn't data supporting controlling the lowest levels of exposure.  There are multiple papers recommending it be adjusted.

Who didn't know this... radio-hormesis  ;)

Marlin

Yes I agree but now the DOE is no longer talking about it they are ending it.  [salute]

Mounder

It's a start.  Other agencies and states all dictate it to some degree.

radcoon

Pretty sure this isn't a done deal yet. See the definition on the DOE website:
https://www.directives.doe.gov/terms_definitions/as-low-as-reasonably-achievable-alara

It still has the DOE Policy from January 2025 being in place. Any change would take some time to implement though.

However, back in July the NRC hosted a great Public meeting on this subject (Executive Order on nuclear regulation) and posted it on youtube if you have 3 hours: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNiq6uAgX7I

There is also an interesting DOE lab paper supporting the elimination of ALARA here:
https://inl.gov/content/uploads/2023/07/INLRPT-25-85463_Reevaluation-of-Radiation-Protection-Standards-R0-Final.pdf

I am curious how this will all play out and wonder how much time/money any of these changes will save.  I hope we all move forward with eyes wide open to the risks and rewards.

Marlin

Quote from: radcoon on Yesterday at 09:06Pretty sure this isn't a done deal yet. See the definition on the DOE website:
https://www.directives.doe.gov/terms_definitions/as-low-as-reasonably-achievable-alara

It still has the DOE Policy from January 2025 being in place. Any change would take some time to implement though.

However, back in July the NRC hosted a great Public meeting on this subject (Executive Order on nuclear regulation) and posted it on youtube if you have 3 hours: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNiq6uAgX7I

There is also an interesting DOE lab paper supporting the elimination of ALARA here:
https://inl.gov/content/uploads/2023/07/INLRPT-25-85463_Reevaluation-of-Radiation-Protection-Standards-R0-Final.pdf

I am curious how this will all play out and wonder how much time/money any of these changes will save.  I hope we all move forward with eyes wide open to the risks and rewards.

The article seems fairly definitive "Energy Secretary Chris Wright killed the Department of Energy's decades-old radiation safety standard Friday.". Bureaucracy especially federal is ponderously slow it may take a bit to filter down to documents.

Marlin

Probably should add that some DOE facilities are regulated by the NRC not the DOE, so depending on facility this may have no effect.

NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2026 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?