Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Thomas Edison BSAST degree and QAI  

Author Topic: Thomas Edison BSAST degree and QAI  (Read 11219 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gregg098

  • Guest
Thomas Edison BSAST degree and QAI
« on: Jan 28, 2006, 12:09 »
Im just curious, based on personal experience, how useful is the Thomas Edison University BSAST in Nuclear Technology for getting a decent job after the Navy? It just seems like such a cheesy degree since they give navy nukes so much credit for power school. Will employers see this degree and not think a whole lot about it? Or will it help just because I can say "I have a degree"?

Also, Im qualified QAI. Im told that also looks good on a resume. Will this qualification help me out on the outside? Just curious what other opportunities it could open up for me.

Any other suggestions for quals that will really help me out on the outside besides watch supervisor?

Thanks for all of your help.

Rad Sponge

  • Guest
Re: Thomas Edison BSAST degree and QAI
« Reply #1 on: Jan 28, 2006, 08:10 »
It really depends on your career plans...

It really depends on your Navy experience...

It really depends on the whole package...

     Why such a vague answer? Because there is no set answer for your question. SInce leaving the Navy, I have been offered jobs by federal and private companies to be a SRO-trainee, Health Physicist (not tech, but a professional HP), and a Chemist.

All these jobs had a base salary between 58-68K and included the full bene package and RELO. Do I have an engineering degree? NO. Am I a ABHP certified HP? NO. Do I have a degree in Chemistry? NO. Do I have a degree? Yes. A BA in Liberal Arts from Thomas Edision State College.

So that should answer at least one concern? The most important thing is HAVING a degree from an ACCREDITED institution of higher learning and TESC satisfies that 100%.

However, let's look at the whole package concept. How many years have you served? What supervisory roles have you held? Awards? Instructor duty? Qualifications?

I have pretty much been playing up on my Leading ELT and Instructor qualifications and overall history of sustained superior performance and all that to gain entry into the civilian world of chemistry and HP.

But, I have 4 different resumes, pinpointing and playing up certain skills depending on the type of job. The degree is always included and when asked why a tech guy like me did not get a tech degree I always say:

"I have nearly 10 years of technical experience in applied engineering; although getting a technical degree would have seemed a natural fit, I wanted to explore other subjects to give me a wider breadth of knowledge"

That hasn't seemed to hurt me so far, and my ability to communicate on a human level (think nuke, speak human) has proved to be exceptionally useful in competing for jobs.

I am not saying don't get the BSAST, because its very prevalent in the Navy Nuke turned Civilian Operator ranks, just get a degree that you desire based on your interests. Its just a BS/BA, get it, and prepare for MS/MA degree.

Overall its the whole package: Your resume, you experience, how you present yourself in person, your ability to effectively verbally communicate, your education, how soon you send back Thank You cards to the people interviewing you (LOL). Everything.

And the QAI? It doesn't hurt. Quality is huge in and out of nuke land.

Let me know if I can be of futher assistance.

Good luck and thanks for you service.

JMK



Offline flamatrix99

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
  • Karma: 75
  • Gender: Male
  • I really dig you Sir...
Re: Thomas Edison BSAST degree and QAI
« Reply #2 on: Nov 19, 2006, 12:49 »
It really depends on your career plans...

It really depends on your Navy experience...

It really depends on the whole package...

     Why such a vague answer? Because there is no set answer for your question. SInce leaving the Navy, I have been offered jobs by federal and private companies to be a SRO-trainee, Health Physicist (not tech, but a professional HP), and a Chemist.

All these jobs had a base salary between 58-68K and included the full bene package and RELO. Do I have an engineering degree? NO. Am I a ABHP certified HP? NO. Do I have a degree in Chemistry? NO. Do I have a degree? Yes. A BA in Liberal Arts from Thomas Edision State College.

So that should answer at least one concern? The most important thing is HAVING a degree from an ACCREDITED institution of higher learning and TESC satisfies that 100%.

However, let's look at the whole package concept. How many years have you served? What supervisory roles have you held? Awards? Instructor duty? Qualifications?

I have pretty much been playing up on my Leading ELT and Instructor qualifications and overall history of sustained superior performance and all that to gain entry into the civilian world of chemistry and HP.

But, I have 4 different resumes, pinpointing and playing up certain skills depending on the type of job. The degree is always included and when asked why a tech guy like me did not get a tech degree I always say:

"I have nearly 10 years of technical experience in applied engineering; although getting a technical degree would have seemed a natural fit, I wanted to explore other subjects to give me a wider breadth of knowledge"

That hasn't seemed to hurt me so far, and my ability to communicate on a human level (think nuke, speak human) has proved to be exceptionally useful in competing for jobs.

I am not saying don't get the BSAST, because its very prevalent in the Navy Nuke turned Civilian Operator ranks, just get a degree that you desire based on your interests. Its just a BS/BA, get it, and prepare for MS/MA degree.

Overall its the whole package: Your resume, you experience, how you present yourself in person, your ability to effectively verbally communicate, your education, how soon you send back Thank You cards to the people interviewing you (LOL). Everything.

And the QAI? It doesn't hurt. Quality is huge in and out of nuke land.

Let me know if I can be of futher assistance.

Good luck and thanks for you service.

JMK

A degree can't hurt. If you get out of nuclear power they will never know the difference.  I am an ex-MM1/SS and present non-licensed operator. The only Navy qualifications that I have seen matter in commercial nuclear power is EWS/RO.  They make you ELIGIBLE for an instant SRO (Senior Reactor Operator) position. It doesn't mean you will get it but you meet the requirements.

I do not know about HP/Chem positions since I am in Operations.

Part of my previous job before coming back to nuclear power I was the QA administrator for the plant I worked at. If you want to get a QA job in the non-nuke world brush up on ISO 9002.  The real world does QA completely different then the Navy but QAI is a good resume bullet. Just remember to put it in non-Navy terms so people can understand what you did.

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?