Yeah, the old boomer life chain. Trident-TRF-Trident-TTF-Trident. An entire 20 years on one base, and one class of ship. Pretty sad IMHO.
But here is my fledgeling dogma on sub life...... if you do a full 4.5-5 year seatour on a Fast boat as your first tour (especially in Groton or Norfolk), chances are pretty good that you will not have a tougher sea assignment for the rest of your career. This excludes spec-op boats, NR-1, and refueling overhaul assignments. Differant challanges yes, but not as mentally/physically demanding. The combination of first time quals, fast boat life/schedule, and anal-retentive chain of commands seem to converge the strongest at these two bases. If you can survive those years, I personnaly belive you can survive just about anything the Sub community can throw at you....with the above mentioned exceptions.
As far as switching back and forth between the two goes, it depends on several things:
-Like when are you up for orders? After two years aboard your submarine, you can put in a request to transfer to another sub, providing you agree to stay on that second sub for at least 3 years. This is rare because your current command usually wont let you go (unless you are not very keepable) and the detailer must have a higher need for you on another boat in order to pull you off your first one. Remember, it costs the government lots of greenbacks to move people around the country. Be careful what you wish for and that whole grass is greener thing. Boats with immediate needs may have poor command climates, nazi CO's or Chiefs of the Boat (COBs), or just bad luck, like the Greenville or San Francisco.
-If you reenlisted to go to shore duty, how much time left in the navy do you owe before your second or third enlistment is up? Did you agree to keep recieving sub pay while on shore duty in return for going back to sea? Most shore duties are only 3 years +/- a few months long. If you finish that duty, and still have a year or two (or more) left, STAND BY! you are now at the mercy of your detailer. Correct me if I'm wrong Tater, but I bet this is what happened to your guy in Pearl, right? Only have 18 months left in the Navy and you just finished your shore duty in Groton?....chances are you are going to move down to the waterfront and finish your obligated sea time on a fast boat. Seen this last case more times than I can remember,

. But if you manage your enlistments well, don't get greedy when it comes to reenlistment bonuses, and decline sub pay while at shore duty, you can use the threat of leaving the navy after shore duty as a major bargaining chip for orders. Thats what I did.
Story-time***Myself and another E-6 arrived at shore-duty in Hawaii the same year/month. We had been in the Navy almost the same length of time, and had qualified the exact same watches. He came from a Trident, me a Fast Boat. He obligated extra sea time in return for an extra $375 a month for 3 years, I did not. Fast forward to 3 years later; he is stuck with two choices from the detailer, Fast boat out of Pearl Harbour or Groton. Nothing else. Since my second enlistment was up, I had a choice; call the detailer and pretty much tell him where and on what boat I wanted to go to, or else become a civilian in 3 months.
As of now I am attending college, working what, to me, feels like almost part-time on a low stress enviroment submarine, and I live close to my family and friends. Meanwhile my friend is stuck in Hawaii, putting up with a harder lifestyle that he is used to, and is seriously debating on leaving the navy with 12+ years served.***
Would things be differant had our roles reversed? Definately. Did he make bad career decisions? No, he did what was best for him and his family. But, I do belive had he served on a Fast attack first, his views on staying in the Navy, keeping sub-pay, and negotiating for a shore duty billet would be differant.
Please don't think that I downplay the importance of our Trident fleet. They perform an extremely important job in keeping America safe. They are told to work long hours and leave their families just like every other sailor. They do the job that the country asks of them, and they do it well.
Duke, to answer your question: squids are skimmers and bubble-heads, but bubble-heads are not skimmers, and skimmers are not bubble-heads. There are more former bubble-heads who are now skimmers, than there are former skimmers who are now bubble-heads. Most bubbble-heads don't want to be skimmers, and I would venture to say that most skimmers don't want to be bubble-heads. Bubble-heads get paid extra to be bubble-heads, but skimmers just get paid. I hope that answers your question
