NukeWorker Forum

News and Discussions => Nuke News => Topic started by: Marlin on Sep 24, 2019, 12:03

Title: Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report
Post by: Marlin on Sep 24, 2019, 12:03
Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report


https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-energy-nuclearpower/nuclear-energy-too-slow-too-expensive-to-save-climate-report-idUKKBN1W909J
Title: Re: Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report
Post by: GLW on Sep 24, 2019, 02:46
Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report


https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-energy-nuclearpower/nuclear-energy-too-slow-too-expensive-to-save-climate-report-idUKKBN1W909J (https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-energy-nuclearpower/nuclear-energy-too-slow-too-expensive-to-save-climate-report-idUKKBN1W909J)

well then, we're doomed to extinction, oh well,...

Title: Re: Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report
Post by: hamsamich on Sep 24, 2019, 07:59
But But, the "experts" have known about his for 35 years!!!
Title: Re: Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report
Post by: Brett LaVigne on Sep 26, 2019, 09:52
Too slow? Maybe we should have done something a couple decades ago. Too expensive? How much is too much if the results mean the planet is not habitable?
Title: Re: Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report
Post by: GLW on Sep 26, 2019, 01:03
Too slow? Maybe we should have done something a couple decades ago. Too expensive? How much is too much if the results mean the planet is not habitable?

well, that is how you know that "12 years left" is science fiction and not science fact,...




 
Title: Re: Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report
Post by: Brett LaVigne on Sep 26, 2019, 06:11
well, that is how you know that "12 years left" is science fiction and not science fact,...




 

12 years? No probably not. But I do worry about my teenaged kid, her kids and what they may be facing.
Title: Re: Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report
Post by: scotoma on Sep 29, 2019, 07:50
The Earth will save itself, with us or without us. The planet will remain "habitable", but probably less comfortable. Energy demand will increase. We will have to harness the heat in the air and water. The wind turbines will have to operate at higher wind speed. All living things will have to adapt or become extinct. I will cease to exist before all this happens.
Title: Re: Nuclear energy too slow, too expensive to save climate: report
Post by: SloGlo on Sep 29, 2019, 09:24
to slow... think of awl the plants knot built caws of anti nuke sentiment in the 70s n 80s.
two expensive... yew git watt yue pay four.

looking at acreage per megawatt... food oar electricity, choose carefully.