NukeWorker Forum

Career Path => Radiation Safety => Topic started by: Cycoticpenguin on Nov 29, 2010, 03:16

Title: rad tech vs ops
Post by: Cycoticpenguin on Nov 29, 2010, 03:16
Anyone have experience in both? I am being considered for RP tech 1/C position, took TECH test, and they seemed to love me, but they really pushed me to go to Operations. So I obliged because that's what I wanted to do in the first place. Lets say due to some cosmic twist, they dont hire me for that, and I get this tech job... Where do I go from there? Can I still go after SRO eventually?  I will attempt to search.... but so far its in vain.

I dont even know what that job entails -.-  anyone have a cliffs notes of what they do? 
Title: Re: rad tech vs ops
Post by: retired nuke on Nov 29, 2010, 06:47
If you take the RP tech job, expect a delay getting into Ops - they will expect you to complete RP quals first.
We have a former Chem tech in the Ctrl Rm now - but it took her a hard push to get into Ops, be / qualify AO, and do license school. She has a degree in Chem, and is eligible for SRO school in the future.
Starting in another Dept adds 3-4 years to your advancement track IMHO. Doesn't kill it, and the experience could add something to your knowledge / experience. The same would apply if you started in Maintenance - you would still have to transfer to Ops.
As far as what an RP tech does - it's Radiation Protection. Surveys, exposure estimates, emergency response training, some instrumentation. Training (and yes, you will have initial training) and qualification takes 6 months - 1 year. Then most likely on shift (at least at my plant). It is different than Navy Radcon - at least to those ELTs I've talked to.
Good luck.
Title: Re: rad tech vs ops
Post by: xobxdoc on Nov 29, 2010, 08:50
I was a road HP for 11 years but I'm in Ops now. They are both good jobs, but the opportunities in Ops are better than in HP. Also at my plant in HP there is the possibility of being sent to other plants to do outage work. It is voluntary for now until they run out of volunteers. It pays well but you are back on the road again.
Title: Re: rad tech vs ops
Post by: Cycoticpenguin on Nov 29, 2010, 03:18
thank you guys for the response.

I just cant find much about this job other then EXTREME basics lol.


EDIT: If I get my degree in engineering, and was a rad tech, could I go direct SRO???
Title: Re: rad tech vs ops
Post by: JsonD13 on Nov 29, 2010, 06:07
From my experience, I would say go with what makes you feel better.  But, since you basically told the company that you would do anything for them, just enjoy what's handed to you.

I'm in RP now, we do a bit more than the Navy taught you.  What do you mean by extreme basics?

Jason
Title: Re: rad tech vs ops
Post by: Cycoticpenguin on Nov 30, 2010, 12:37
Quote from: JsonD13 on Nov 29, 2010, 06:07
From my experience, I would say go with what makes you feel better.  But, since you basically told the company that you would do anything for them, just enjoy what's handed to you.

I'm in RP now, we do a bit more than the Navy taught you.  What do you mean by extreme basics?

Jason

To be honest, I dont want the RP tech job, I want to get into ops. Thats what I did, thats what I enjoyed doing. I would take this job to get my foot in the door, more so then make it a career. If I had to do it, I would.

I just mean, I cant find much other then "we do dosimetry, surveys, and estimates"... great. I guess I want a "walkthrough" of a "typical day" haha. I want operations, because I know what it is. Im completely ignorant to the RP side, I admit.