NukeWorker Forum

News and Discussions => Nuke News => Topic started by: Marlin on Sep 19, 2013, 12:32

Title: Air Force report: Biggs Airfield bunker radiation 7 times acceptable level
Post by: Marlin on Sep 19, 2013, 12:32
Radiation levels detected at an old Biggs Airfield bunker were nearly seven times higher than established acceptable safe levels, according to a U.S. military report obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

The U.S. Air Force Safety Center prepared the July 3 report for Fort Bliss titled, "Trip Report, Inspection of Former Air Force Weapons Storage Area (WSA), Biggs Army Airfield."

During a site visit in June, the Air Force inspectors took alpha and beta particle readings in a storage igloo or bunker (Building 11507) with two devices, a Ludlum Model 2360 meter and a Ludlum Model 43-89 probe. They also conducted complex calculations, and applied estimates that the inspectors described as "conservative."

Inspectors said they found high levels of uranium activity concentration levels at location "Painted 3."

"This level is in excess of the acceptable maximum level in (Atomic Energy Commission) Regulatory Guide 1.86 for uranium isotopes," the report said.

The contaminated bunker is in the Snake Pit area at Biggs Airfield, roughly north of Fred Wilson and east of Railroad Drive in Northeast El Paso.

"The radioactivity of the painted site on the floor of Building 11507 was estimated in the report to be contaminated at a level almost seven times greater than is considered acceptable," said John Walton, an expert at the University of Texas at El Paso who reviewed the figures for the El Paso Times. "Some of the initial contamination has been removed over time as the paint wore off the floor."

Overall, "this is not huge, but the danger from radiation depends on how long you've been exposed to it," Walton said.


Continued at link below

http://www.elpasotimes.com/news/ci_24097994/air-force-report-radiation-contamination-at-biggs-bunker#!
Title: Re: Air Force report: Biggs Airfield bunker radiation 7 times acceptable level
Post by: atomicarcheologist on Sep 20, 2013, 10:28
Seven times 1.86 levels?  Only the most experienced should remediate this!  This is a good time of year for El Paso, be glad to go.
Title: Re: Air Force report: Biggs Airfield bunker radiation 7 times acceptable level
Post by: GLW on Sep 20, 2013, 12:23
Quote from: Atomic Archeologist on Sep 20, 2013, 10:28
Seven times 1.86 levels?  Only the most experienced should remediate this!  This is a good time of year for El Paso, be glad to go.

Under 1575, seven times 1.86 could very well be no big deal,.... [coffee]
Title: Re: Air Force report: Biggs Airfield bunker radiation 7 times acceptable level
Post by: SloGlo on Sep 23, 2013, 09:55
Quote from: GLW on Sep 20, 2013, 12:23
Under 1575, seven times 1.86 could very well be no big deal,.... [coffee]

shhhh.... [whistle].... yinz keep talking like that 'n peeple will start thinking most radiation levels aren't problematic.