NukeWorker Forum
News and Discussions => Nuke News => Topic started by: Marlin on Oct 15, 2014, 05:46
-
Nuclear fusion energy in a decade?
Lockheed Martin is betting on it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-business/wp/2014/10/15/nuclear-fusion-energy-in-a-decade-lockheed-martin-is-betting-on-it/
-
I think it goes without saying that we have been hearing things to this effect for the last decade, if not more...
The start up / standby power for an operating nuclear fusion plant large enough to power a city would likely require a fission nuclear plant adjacent to it. When the technology becomes commerically viable (10? 20? years) it is likely to result in additional 'traditional' plants.
-
Well this grabbed my attention today as well. I would look forward to the day it moves from science fiction to reality, yet I would bet not in the next thirty years will we see a real viable fusion reactor. We can barely get three new fission plants approved and started, first ones in what- just about 30 years (between online dates)?
Lockheed Martin seems overly optimistic, IMHO
-
Someone link the old posts.
-
Fission vs Fusion>> Pretty much sums it up!!!
https://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php/topic,21757.0.html
-
Fission vs Fusion>> Pretty much sums it up!!!
https://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php/topic,21757.0.html
Yeah, that's the one.
-
Does not look the same to me this is more on a par with is this for real or another Cold Fusion. Just my opinion