NukeWorker Forum

News and Discussions => Nuke News => Topic started by: atomicarcheologist on Jul 31, 2018, 08:32

Title: Luckey plant update
Post by: atomicarcheologist on Jul 31, 2018, 08:32
http://www.13abc.com/content/news/Luckey-Beryllium-clean-up-to-cost-taxpayers-244-million-488547111.html (http://www.13abc.com/content/news/Luckey-Beryllium-clean-up-to-cost-taxpayers-244-million-488547111.html)
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: Dave Warren on Aug 01, 2018, 09:15
Very familiar with this place. Past and present. The writing in this piece is dramatic, at best, like normal write ups on these types of facilities. These people have never faced the challenges of trying to clean up beryllium. Its not like sorting rad contaminated soil, its a whole different ballgame.
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: Mounder on Aug 05, 2018, 12:29
"Production of the first nuclear weapons, basically it produced beryllium compounds, which are used in the nuclear industry," Vriesen said.  Poor choice of wording...
The author probably thinks beryllium is a radioactive element, as would most the readers.
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: TVA on Aug 05, 2018, 04:37
Quote from: Mounder on Aug 05, 2018, 12:29
"Production of the first nuclear weapons, basically it produced beryllium compounds, which are used in the nuclear industry," Vriesen said.  Poor choice of wording...
The author probably thinks beryllium is a radioactive element, as would most the readers.


You do realize beryllium is radioactive right?
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: Marlin on Aug 05, 2018, 05:08
Quote from: TVA on Aug 05, 2018, 04:37

You do realize beryllium is radioactive right?

Not to the point it is a radiological concern as it's specific activity is so low that it is essentially stable with the trace amount of the radioactive isotopes non-detectable.
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: TVA on Aug 05, 2018, 05:17
Agreed but that isnt what Mound said.
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: Marlin on Aug 05, 2018, 06:18
Quote from: TVA on Aug 05, 2018, 05:17
Agreed but that isnt what Mound said.

Yes, poor inaccurate reporting. We should be use to that, unfortunately one of nuclear's consistent shortfalls is poor public education
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: TVA on Aug 05, 2018, 06:21
Except Mound is a nuke. He stated beryllium isnt radioactive when in fact it is.
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: Mounder on Aug 05, 2018, 06:40
Clearly the natural beryllium created at luckey (forerunners of Brush Wellman) was used for a number of downstream products, including those that would induce it's neutron release.  No one cares about Be9.
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: Marlin on Aug 05, 2018, 06:48
Quote from: Mounder on Aug 05, 2018, 06:40
Clearly the natural beryllium created at luckey (forerunners of Brush Wellman) was used for a number of downstream products, including those that would induce it's neutron release.  No one cares about Be9.

Be 9 is virtually %100 of natural beryllium, it causes Berylliosis as a sensitizer. Beryllium is as regulated in its powder form as is any other hazardous material. As a side note it is common in making golf club heads.
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: SloGlo on Aug 05, 2018, 07:03
Quote from: Marlin on Aug 05, 2018, 06:48
Be 9 is.... common in making golf club heads.
sew keep that driver down wind when going fore the for hundred yarder.
Title: Re: Luckey plant update
Post by: Dave Warren on Aug 07, 2018, 01:14
The farmer next to this site grew all his crops there for many many years and he worked at the plant when it was running. The beryllium took him to heaven 5 years ago, he had so many problems internally. His wife said he never had a night where he slept all the way through without a coughing fit. No respirators, no PPE, just run up and down the stairs with sacks of this stuff.