I don't know how I did it, but I did.  I finally passed Roll Tide for "Most Time Online"
Rennhack  13d 4h 38m 
Roll Tide  12d 21h 59m 
Nuclear NASCAR  8d 22h 36m 
Dan_E.  6d 4h 53m 
Marlin  5d 4h 19m 
Beer Court  5d 2h 59m 
HydroDave63  5d 3m 
Camella Black  4d 8h 20m 
RAD-GHOST  4d 1h 21m 
Atomic_Punk  3d 19h 46m 
			
			
			
				It only counts 10 minutes from the last activity.
It started counting when we upgraded to the SMF software (about a year ago ~400 days I'd guess.
It just counts the time you are active, and keeps counting, 1 hr is 60 active minutes, its a running total.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Shayne on Feb 23, 2005, 09:00
I spend time on the site as a guest also, so I guess I have more time than my profile says.
NO credit for guests, you should stay logged in!
			
 
			
			
				Click on forum tab, go to the bottom of the page, and click on "more stats (http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=stats)".
I'm still kicking your hind end!
Rennhack  16d 21h 44m 
Roll Tide  14d 20h 48m 
Nuclear NASCAR  10d 18h 30m 
Dan_E.  6d 18h 58m 
Beer Court  5d 20h 46m 
Marlin  5d 17h 56m 
HydroDave63  5d 16h 0m 
Camella Black  5d 13h 50m 
RDTroja  5d 7h 39m 
PWHoppe  4d 16h 55m 
It's crazy, Tom has almost twice as much time online as the next closest person, and Roll tide has almost three times as much time online.
			
			
			
				Update:
Rennhack  25d 15h 5m 
Roll Tide  16d 23h 43m 
Nuclear NASCAR  15d 8h 19m 
Marlin  12d 3h 24m 
PWHoppe  10d 18h 3m 
Dan_E.  10d 3h 29m 
RDTroja  9d 16h 1m 
HydroDave63  9d 12h 22m 
Shayne  9d 11h 11m 
BeerCourt  8d 14h 52m 
			
			
			
				but anyone can fudge the stats by logging on Forever...
			
			
			
				Quote from: HydroDave63 on Apr 15, 2006, 01:00
but anyone can fudge the stats by logging on Forever...
Not true, it does NOT count time logged in, it counts ACTIVITY for logged in people.  It you stay logged in, and visit the site for 10 min a week, you get 10 min of credit, not a week.
			
 
			
			
				Marlin takes second spot, and Troja advances... NuclearNASCAR drops to 5th place.  Troy holds on to 10th slot.
Rennhack  36d 21h 3m 
Marlin  26d 19h 11m 
Roll Tide  26d 37m 
RDTroja  24d 9h 47m 
Nuclear NASCAR  23d 14h 24m 
PWHoppe  22d 12h 50m 
Mike McFarlin  21d 18h 47m 
HydroDave63  15d 13h 13m 
honeycomb  14d 12h 36m 
BeerCourt  13d 14h 30m 
			
			
			
				Nuclear Nascar continues on the downward slide, now in 6th place.  Mc Farlin jumps 2 places, and Honeycomb passes HydroDave:
Rennhack  37d 17h 15m 
Marlin  28d 5h 47m 
Roll Tide  26d 13h 21m 
RDTroja  25d 21h 50m 
Mike McFarlin  24d 11h 9m 
Nuclear NASCAR  24d 7h 14m 
PWHoppe  23d 15h 51m 
honeycomb  21d 12h 20m 
HydroDave63  15d 14h 33m 
BeerCourt  14d 1h 15m 
			
			
			
				Scanning thru this thread is like watching The Biggest Loser, except you're hoping the numbers go up. 
			
			
			
				Rennhack  40d 11h 39m 
Mike McFarlin  38d 3h 8m 
HoneyComb  34d 11h 45m 
Marlin  32d 15h 47m 
RDTroja  30d 4h 23m 
PWHoppe  27d 4h 40m 
Nuclear NASCAR  27d 34m 
Roll Tide  26d 20h 41m 
HydroDave63  17d 18h 8m 
Camella Black  15d 18h 50m 
Nuclear Nascar went from 3rd place, to 5th, to 6th, now he's almost off the list at 7th.
			
			
			
				That is just not healthy...
Mike McFarlin  41d 19h 46m 
Rennhack  40d 16h 46m 
HoneyComb  34d 22h 16m 
Marlin  33d 6h 29m 
RDTroja  30d 21h 1m 
PWHoppe  27d 18h 13m 
Nuclear NASCAR  27d 10h 59m 
Roll Tide  26d 20h 47m 
HydroDave63  18d 5h 0m 
Camella Black  15d 22h 10m 
			
			
			
				Update:
Marssim         68d 20h 18m
HydroDave63       62d 5h 25m
RDTroja       61d 7h 40m
Marlin       58d 3h 21m
Nuclear NASCAR       51d 12h 23m
Mike McFarlin       51d 4h 3m
Gamecock       49d 2h 35m
Rennhack       48d 15h 39m
UncaBuffalo       32d 20h 23m
PWHoppe       31d 1h 42m
			
			
			
				Marssim         76d 14h 20m
HydroDave63       66d 5h 8m
RDTroja       63d 15h 56m
Marlin       60d 7h 33m
Nuclear NASCAR       53d 16h 7m
Mike McFarlin       51d 13h 55m
Rennhack       51d 6h 1m
Gamecock       50d 17h 6m
UncaBuffalo       34d 17h 54m
PWHoppe       31d 2h 13m
Looks like Io pulled ahead of Gamecock, all others stay the same.
It's interesting to look back and see the usage change.  Where did Dan_E go?  I wonder what the Time Online/ Posts ratio is, and Time online to Karma ratio is.
			
			
			
				Marssim  78d 22m 
HydroDave63  67d 3h 35m 
RDTroja  63d 23h 29m 
Marlin  60d 17h 28m 
Nuclear NASCAR  53d 21h 31m 
Mike McFarlin  51d 20h 26m 
Rennhack  51d 11h 7m 
Gamecock  50d 22h 48m 
UncaBuffalo  35d 0m 
PWHoppe  31d 2h 19m 
			
			
			
				Quote from: Rennhack on Sep 15, 2010, 04:55
Marssim         76d 14h 20m
HydroDave63       66d 5h 8m
RDTroja       63d 15h 56m
Marlin       60d 7h 33m
Nuclear NASCAR       53d 16h 7m
Mike McFarlin       51d 13h 55m
Rennhack       51d 6h 1m
Gamecock       50d 17h 6m
UncaBuffalo       34d 17h 54m
PWHoppe       31d 2h 13m
Looks like Io pulled ahead of Gamecock, all others stay the same.
It's interesting to look back and see the usage change.  Where did Dan_E go?  I wonder what the Time Online/ Posts ratio is, and Time online to Karma ratio is.
Quote from: Mike McFarlin on Sep 30, 2010, 08:49
Marssim  78d 22m 
HydroDave63  67d 3h 35m 
RDTroja  63d 23h 29m 
Marlin  60d 17h 28m 
Nuclear NASCAR  53d 21h 31m 
Mike McFarlin  51d 20h 26m 
Rennhack  51d 11h 7m 
Gamecock  50d 22h 48m 
UncaBuffalo  35d 0m 
PWHoppe  31d 2h 19m 
I find the 15 day delta interesting.
			
 
			
			
				Quote from: Marssim on Oct 02, 2010, 10:13
But I thought you had to be typing or clicking the mouse for 34 hours not just keeping the webpage open,....
You do.
			
 
			
			
				Marssim  80d 16h 11m 
HydroDave63  69d 23h 0m 
RDTroja  64d 2h 8m 
Marlin  61d 12h 53m 
Nuclear NASCAR  54d 13h 25m 
Rennhack  52d 9h 49m 
Mike McFarlin  52d 6h 18m 
Gamecock  51d 10h 21m 
UncaBuffalo  36d 1h 2m 
PWHoppe  31d 2h 22m 
			
			
			
				Quote from: Sun Dog on Nov 02, 2010, 12:09
Thanks for sharing the useful information!  Where in the heck did you ever come up with these factoids?  You are truly the most interesting man in the world.
http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=stats
			
 
			
			
				Quote from: Rennhack on Nov 02, 2010, 07:47
I pulled ahead!
Perhaps a graph of the trend will give a better picture? ;)
			
 
			
			
				Quote from: HydroDave63 on Nov 02, 2010, 08:09
Perhaps a graph of the trend will give a better picture? ;)
You are evil.  You know my kryptonite.
			
 
			
			
				Click on image for a larger view.
(http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4651.0;attach=4121;image) (http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4651.0;attach=4121;image)
(http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4651.0;attach=4123;image) (http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4651.0;attach=4123;image)
(http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4651.0;attach=4125;image) (http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4651.0;attach=4125;image)
(http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4651.0;attach=4127;image) (http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4651.0;attach=4127;image)
Note, I deleted users with 2 or less data points.  I also added 2010 data for Troy and Roll Tide, from their profile today, Then decided not to include them, as they are not in the 2010 Top 10 Population.  
Also interesting to note, is that all of those people have been moderators except Spanky.
PWHoppe (and Troy &Roll Tide) has a consistent, but almost flat rise, the rest of us have a sharp, but consistent rise. -- But Dave... Wow.  Do you see that rise from 2008 to 2010?  I regret not having a data-point from 2009, and not having one from the middle of 2007.  Lets try to do better in collecting these data points.  
Below is the data I used for the chart.
   2/13/2005   4/14/2006   12/3/2007   3/18/2008   11/2/2010
Beer Court   7379   12412   19590      33367
HydroDave63   7203   13702   22393   25568   100740
Marlin   7459   17484   38591   47027   88613
Mike McFarlin         31367   54908   75258
Nuclear NASCAR   12876   22099   33984   38914   78565
PWHoppe      15483   32450   39160   44782
RDTroja      13921   35147   43463   92288
Rennhack   18998   36905   53103   58299   75469
Roll Tide   18599   24463   37477   38681   40225
All of the data collected, including data not used:
Atomic_Punk   5506   2/13/2005
Beer Court   7379   2/13/2005
Beer Court   19590   12/3/2007
Beer Court   12412   4/14/2006
Camella Black   6260   2/13/2005
Camella Black   22730   3/18/2008
Dan_E.   8933   2/13/2005
Dan_E.   14609   4/14/2006
Gamecock   70715   7/27/2010
Gamecock   74061   11/2/2010
honeycomb   20916   12/3/2007
honeycomb   49665   3/18/2008
HydroDave63   7203   2/13/2005
HydroDave63   89605   7/27/2010
HydroDave63   22393   12/3/2007
HydroDave63   25568   3/18/2008
HydroDave63   100740   11/2/2010
HydroDave63   13702   4/14/2006
Marlin   7459   2/13/2005
Marlin   17484   4/14/2006
Marlin   38591   12/3/2007
Marlin   47027   3/18/2008
Marlin   83721   7/27/2010
Marlin   88613   11/2/2010
Marssim   99138   7/27/2010
Marssim   116171   11/2/2010
Mike McFarlin   73683   7/27/2010
Mike McFarlin   31367   12/3/2007
Mike McFarlin   54908   3/18/2008
Mike McFarlin   75258   11/2/2010
Nuclear NASCAR   12876   2/13/2005
Nuclear NASCAR   22099   4/14/2006
Nuclear NASCAR   33984   12/3/2007
Nuclear NASCAR   38914   3/18/2008
Nuclear NASCAR   74183   7/27/2010
Nuclear NASCAR   78565   11/2/2010
PWHoppe   15483   4/14/2006
PWHoppe   44742   7/27/2010
PWHoppe   32450   12/3/2007
PWHoppe   39160   3/18/2008
PWHoppe   44782   11/2/2010
RDTroja   88300   7/27/2010
RDTroja   35147   12/3/2007
RDTroja   43463   3/18/2008
RDTroja   92288   11/2/2010
RDTroja   13921   4/14/2006
Rennhack   18998   2/13/2005
Rennhack   36905   4/14/2006
Rennhack   53103   12/3/2007
Rennhack   58299   3/18/2008
Rennhack   70059   7/27/2010
Rennhack   75469   11/2/2010
Roll Tide   18599   2/13/2005
Roll Tide   24463   4/14/2006
Roll Tide   38681   3/18/2008
Roll Tide   37477   12/3/2007
UncaBuffalo   47303   7/27/2010
UncaBuffalo   51902   11/2/2010
			
			
			
				What about Marssim?!
			
			
			
				so, perhaps there is a correlation between hours online, dedication and all that good stuff? :)
			
			
			
				Quote from: retread on Nov 02, 2010, 10:15
What about Marssim?!
He was not in the Top 10 before 2010.  I explained that, and showed all the data.
Quote from: Rennhack on Nov 02, 2010, 09:45
Note, I deleted users with 2 or less data points. 
Below is the data I used for the chart.
Marssim   116171   11/2/2010
I used one data point per year.  If YOU wanted to, you could collect all the 2010 only data points, and make a chart.
			
 
			
			
				Quote from: Rennhack on Nov 02, 2010, 10:51
He was not in the Top 10 before 2010.  I explained that, and showed all the data.
Oops.  Sorry, guess I wasn't paying enough attention. :stupidme: :stupidme:
			
 
			
			
				Marssim  88d 12h 43m 
HydroDave63  76d 2h 14m 
RDTroja  65d 15h 39m 
Marlin  63d 19h 44m 
Nuclear NASCAR  55d 19h 55m 
Rennhack  53d 20h 54m 
Mike McFarlin  52d 18h 12m 
Gamecock  52d 16h 52m 
UncaBuffalo  38d 43m 
PWHoppe  31d 2h 56m 
			
			
			
				Quote from: Mike McFarlin on Jan 06, 2011, 11:33
Marssim  88d 12h 43m 
HydroDave63  76d 2h 14m 
RDTroja  65d 15h 39m 
Marlin  63d 19h 44m 
Nuclear NASCAR  55d 19h 55m 
Rennhack  53d 20h 54m 
Mike McFarlin  52d 18h 12m 
Gamecock  52d 16h 52m 
UncaBuffalo  38d 43m 
PWHoppe  31d 2h 56m 
Thanks for capturing the data point.  For some odd reason, i love this thread.  And those charts? Wow!
			
 
			
			
				Marssim  90d 22h 46m 
HydroDave63  77d 23h 53m 
RDTroja  66d 4h 20m 
Marlin  64d 16h 23m 
Nuclear NASCAR  56d 9h 30m 
Rennhack  53d 22h 41m 
Gamecock  53d 10h 57m 
Mike McFarlin  52d 20h 59m 
UncaBuffalo  38d 20h 49m 
PWHoppe  31d 3h 19m 
			
			
			
				Marssim  97d 21h 40m 
HydroDave63  82d 13h 45m 
RDTroja  67d 18h 51m 
Marlin  67d 10h 3m 
Nuclear NASCAR  57d 22h 12m 
Gamecock  54d 22h 5m 
Rennhack  54d 16h 19m 
Mike McFarlin  54d 6m 
UncaBuffalo  39d 15h 4m 
PWHoppe  31d 5h 56m 
			
			
			
				His debate time in PolySci has increased expotentially. Keeps it interesting.
			
			
			
				 Marssim  101d 9h 48m 
HydroDave63  86d 7h 0m 
RDTroja  69d 20h 19m 
Marlin  68d 23h 12m 
Nuclear NASCAR  58d 19h 12m 
Mike McFarlin  57d 5h 48m 
Gamecock  55d 9h 28m 
Rennhack  54d 21h 3m 
UncaBuffalo  40d 6h 50m 
PWHoppe  31d 7h 27m 
 
			
			
			
				I'd like to see a correlation between large time jumps and lay offs.. :)
Spending 14hrs in a plant with no computer/internet seriously skews the numbers.
			
			
			
				Quote from: JeremyCantrell on May 06, 2011, 09:56
I'd like to see a correlation between large time jumps and lay offs.. :)
Spending 14hrs in a plant with no computer/internet seriously skews the numbers.
Marssim is on the left, lit up while projecting. I was carefully listening in the center.
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/10/amestrs.jpg)
			
 
			
			
				HydroDave63  116d 4h 39m 
Marlin  83d 16h 12m 
RDTroja  80d 1h 42m 
Nuclear NASCAR  63d 1h 36m 
Mike McFarlin  58d 17h 50m 
Rennhack  58d 17h 47m 
Gamecock  58d 17h 9m 
UncaBuffalo  46d 4h 0m 
thenukeman  39d 17h 10m 
Drayer  36d 4h 2m 
			
			
			
				Quote from: Mike McFarlin on Apr 15, 2012, 02:32
HydroDave63  116d 4h 39m 
Marlin  83d 16h 12m 
RDTroja  80d 1h 42m 
Nuclear NASCAR  63d 1h 36m 
Mike McFarlin  58d 17h 50m 
Rennhack  58d 17h 47m 
Gamecock  58d 17h 9m 
UncaBuffalo  46d 4h 0m 
thenukeman  39d 17h 10m 
Drayer  36d 4h 2m 
How far back does that go?
			
 
			
			
				Quote from: Drayer on Apr 15, 2012, 08:56
How far back does that go?
About 7.5 years, several software changes ago
			
 
			
			
				HydroDave 116d 4h 39m          Mar 16, 2002
Marlin  83d 16h 12m               Sep 03, 2001
RDTroja  80d 1h 42m              Aug 01, 2001
Nuclear NASCAR  63d 1h 36m   Mar 06, 2002
Mike McFarlin  58d 17h 50m     Dec 13, 2002
Rennhack  58d 17h 47m          Apr 19, 1999
Gamecock  58d 17h 9m           Nov 18, 2007
UncaBuffalo  46d 4h 0m          Oct 01, 2001
thenukeman  39d 17h 10m      Aug 28, 2001
Drayer  36d 4h 2m                  Nov 17, 2010
			
			
			
				HydroDave63       143d 7h 45m
Marlin       104d 2h 51m
RDTroja       94d 6h 39m
Nuclear NASCAR       66d 14h 21m
Mike McFarlin       63d 15h 20m
Rennhack       63d 5h 13m
Gamecock       60d 17h 49m
UncaBuffalo       55d 15h 1m
GLW       50d 12h 45m
Drayer       49d 13h 24m
			
			
			
				Quote from: Drayer on Apr 15, 2012, 08:56
How far back does that go?
Quote from: Rennhack on Feb 23, 2005, 07:40
It started counting when we upgraded to the SMF software (~ Jan 1 2004).
			 
			
			
				   HydroDave63  145d 11h 15m 
Marlin  112d 4h 16m 
RDTroja  97d 6h 41m 
Nuclear NASCAR  67d 12h 30m 
Mike McFarlin  65d 13h 3m 
Rennhack  65d 13h 2m 
Gamecock  61d 4h 18m 
GLW  60d 7h 37m 
UncaBuffalo  58d 8h 4m 
Drayer  51d 14h 29m 
 
			
			
			
				HydroDave63       155d 8h 28m
Marlin       122d 9h 44m
RDTroja       99d 6h 37m
GLW       73d 16h 21m
Rennhack       69d 5h 33m
Nuclear NASCAR       68d 4h 36m
Mike McFarlin       67d 15h 1m
Gamecock       61d 22h 11m
UncaBuffalo       60d 15h 59m
Drayer       52d 19h 16m
GLW steadily regaining his crown.
			
			
			
				Top Topic Starters    
   
Rennhack       1538
Marlin       744
Mike McFarlin       213
thenukeman       159
HydroDave63       140
SloGlo       129
Roll Tide       91
Dave Warren       85
retread       72
UncaBuffalo       68
			
			
			
				Top 10 Posters 
   
Rennhack       7709
Marlin       6427
HydroDave63       6151
SloGlo       4456
RDTroja       3465
Broadzilla       3372
GLW       3034
Dave Warren       2738
Drayer       2533
thenukeman       1936
			
			
			
				Top 10 Boards
GM: PolySci       27920
Navy:Getting In       10716
Navy Nuke       6999
Navy:Staying In       6138
Getting in       4511
Nuke News       4407
Navy:Getting Out       4060
Nuclear Operator       4052
GM: Sports Talk       3462
Outages       2822
			
			
			
				Top 10 Topics (by Replies)
   
Obama Remorse       1560
Japan's Nukes Following Earthquake       803
How would you fix the NNPP       779
Rent a tech Union debate       775
Talk about Bartlett       768
bathroom walls       674
Republican Nominees       674
San Onofre (SONGS)       615
NPUA       606
Favorite Quotes       584
Top 10 Topics (by Views)
   
Japan's Nukes Following Earthquake       309619
POSS (Power Plant Operator Selection System) Test       282567
San Onofre (SONGS)       272258
How would you fix the NNPP       252216
Rent a tech Union debate       250720
Unemployment Claims       231238
Old Bartlett pre-Bartlett Holdings era       205374
NPUA       204500
Calvert Cliffs       199950
Nuke Deppers, Ship Dates, and Stories       197872
			
			
			
				Quote from: Rennhack on May 12, 2015, 11:44
Top 10 Posters 
   
Rennhack       7709
Marlin       6427
HydroDave63       6151
SloGlo       4456
RDTroja       3465
Broadzilla       3372
GLW       3034
Dave Warren       2738
Drayer       2533
thenukeman       1936
It's my primary form of aerobic exercise...
			
 
			
			
				Quote from: Rennhack on May 12, 2015, 11:41
HydroDave63       155d 8h 28m
Marlin       122d 9h 44m
RDTroja       99d 6h 37m
GLW       73d 16h 21m
Rennhack       69d 5h 33m
Nuclear NASCAR       68d 4h 36m
Mike McFarlin       67d 15h 1m
Gamecock       61d 22h 11m
UncaBuffalo       60d 15h 59m
Drayer       52d 19h 16m
Most Time Online
HydroDave63    157d 13h 31m 
Marlin    130d 12h 16m 
RDTroja    100d 10h 48m 
GLW    86d 14h 2m 
Rennhack    72d 22h 6m 
Mike McFarlin    69d 18m 
Nuclear NASCAR    69d 9m 
Gamecock    62d 11h 58m 
UncaBuffalo    60d 23h 30m 
Drayer     52d 21h 21m 
Dave is still holding his crown, and shall for quite some time. GLW continuing to make great advances. Mike McFarlin out paced Nuclear NASCAR.
			
 
			
			
				What determines "time on line", posting/replying or something else?  Since I know everyone on the list keeps logged in forever, as I do, until a computer shutdown forces me to log back in, I just wondered what the determining factors are!  
			
			
			
				Quote from: OldHP on May 10, 2016, 02:39
What determines "time on line", posting/replying or something else?  Since I know everyone on the list keeps logged in forever, as I do, until a computer shutdown forces me to log back in, I just wondered what the determining factors are!  
If I remember correctly it used to be that 10 minutes of inactivity, regardless of being logged in, timed out the time online clock.
			
 
			
			
				I do leave myself logged onto NukeWorker and scan periodically for new posts that would explain a lot. Not that I have not spent plenty of time in discussions.
(http://ih3.redbubble.net/image.11842601.3479/flat,550x550,075,f.jpg)
			
			
			
				Quote from: Rennhack on Feb 23, 2005, 07:40
It only counts 10 minutes from the last activity.
It started counting when we upgraded to the SMF software (about a year ago ~400 days I'd guess.
It just counts the time you are active, and keeps counting, 1 hr is 60 active minutes, its a running total.
2nd post on the first page.  However, it's not 100% accurate, the code below is EXACTLY what happens.
  // Mark your session as being logged.
  $_SESSION['log_time'] = time();
  // Well, they are online now.
  if (empty($_SESSION['timeOnlineUpdated']))
    $_SESSION['timeOnlineUpdated'] = time();
  // Set their login time, if not already done within the last minute.
  if (SMF != 'SSI' && !empty($user_info['last_login']) && $user_info['last_login'] < time() - 60)
  {
    // Don't count longer than 15 minutes.
    if (time() - $_SESSION['timeOnlineUpdated'] > 60 * 15)
      $_SESSION['timeOnlineUpdated'] = time();
    $user_settings['totalTimeLoggedIn'] += time() - $_SESSION['timeOnlineUpdated'];
    updateMemberData($ID_MEMBER, array('lastLogin' => time(), 'memberIP' => '\'' . $user_info['ip'] . '\'', 'memberIP2' => '\'' . $_SERVER['BAN_CHECK_IP'] .
    if (!empty($modSettings['cache_enable']) && $modSettings['cache_enable'] >= 2)
      cache_put_data('user_settings-' . $ID_MEMBER, $user_settings, 60);
    $user_info['total_time_logged_in'] += time() - $_SESSION['timeOnlineUpdated'];
    $_SESSION['timeOnlineUpdated'] = time();
  }It's basically this:
-You access the forum (and are already logged in)
---Your total time does not go up
-You then access a thread 5 minutes later
---Your total time goes up by 5 minutes
-You then access a thread 30 seconds later
---You total time does not go up (less than 60 seconds from the last time update)
-You then access a thread 45 seconds later
---Your total time goes up by 75 seconds (30 + 45 = 75 seconds, which is more than 60 seconds, which means your time goes up).
-You then access a thread 16 minutes later
---Your total time does not go up (the limit is 15 minutes between actions, at this point, you've started a new "session").
-You then access a thread 7 minutes later
---Your total time goes up by 7 minutes.
TLDR;
So, one click >1 min and <15 min from the last click adds time.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Rennhack on May 10, 2016, 07:21
2nd post on the first page.  However, it's not 100% accurate, the code below is EXACTLY what happens.
I liked NN's description better I didn't need calculus and a super computer to figure it out.  ;D 
			
 
			
			
				Quote from: Rennhack on May 10, 2016, 07:21
So, one click >1 min and <15 min from the last click adds time.
			 
			
			
				I think about Dave often, and the contributions he made to the site.  Here is another reminder. Oh, and Nuclear NASCAR overcame Mike McFarlin, but they are still fairly neck n neck.
(https://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4651.0;attach=6348;image)
HydroDave63    157d 13h 31m 
Marlin    142d 20h 58m 
RDTroja    101d 12h 52m 
GLW    97d 1h 51m 
Rennhack    76d 14h 9m 
Nuclear NASCAR    70d 2h 6m 
Mike McFarlin    70d 1h 41m 
Gamecock    64d 8h 26m 
UncaBuffalo    61d 11h 32m 
Drayer    52d 22h 58m 
			
			
			
				fine ally! a list of idlers eye yam knot awn!
			
			
			
				Most Time Online
HydroDave63     157d 13h 31m 
Marlin     154d 4h 54m 
RDTroja     103d 18h 4m 
GLW     103d 4h 49m 
Rennhack     78d 16h 19m 
Nuclear NASCAR     70d 19h 31m 
Mike McFarlin     70d 3h 11m 
Gamecock     64d 8h 26m 
UncaBuffalo     61d 13h 12m 
Drayer     52d 23h 20m