NukeWorker Forum

News and Discussions => Nuke News => Topic started by: Marlin on Jan 06, 2020, 05:56

Title: Op-Ed: One Year After Oyster Creek Shutdown, 3.1M Tons of New Carbon Emissions
Post by: Marlin on Jan 06, 2020, 05:56
Op-Ed: One Year After Oyster Creek Shutdown, 3.1M Tons of New Carbon Emissions


https://www.njspotlight.com/2020/01/op-ed-one-year-after-oyster-creek-shutdown-3-1m-tons-of-new-carbon-emissions/?fbclid=IwAR3djOmXGwJsRqP3m0DYP5h6fyn7Fv7v_qLVoSXFHulMbEu1yOmgdB9Fm9I#.Xg_fBMzSvDE.facebook
Title: Re: Op-Ed: One Year After Oyster Creek Shutdown, 3.1M Tons of New Carbon Emissions
Post by: Bonds 25 on Jan 06, 2020, 08:17
You mean to tell me that you cant just replace clean nuclear power with wind, solar, geothermal and hamster wheels?!?! Certainly, being such a large state, New Jersey must have the SMALL amount of real estate these wonderful renewables require.
Title: Re: Op-Ed: One Year After Oyster Creek Shutdown, 3.1M Tons of New Carbon Emissions
Post by: hamsamich on Jan 06, 2020, 08:54
But But But...I thought all nuclear power was going to be replaced with clean green energy?  Oh my.
Title: Re: Op-Ed: One Year After Oyster Creek Shutdown, 3.1M Tons of New Carbon Emissions
Post by: Bonds 25 on Jan 07, 2020, 11:01
Example and example and example after EXAMPLE showing you cannot replace clean, baseload Nuclear Power with renewables.....yet before every shutdown you read that BS. There is always a plethora of articles stating Nukes being shutdown will easily be replaced by renewables and very few when the facts come out later that....no, no they cant. 
Title: Re: Op-Ed: One Year After Oyster Creek Shutdown, 3.1M Tons of New Carbon Emissions
Post by: scotoma on Jan 07, 2020, 12:37
You can't see it, can't smell it, can't feel it, but you can measure it. Those in denial will chose not to believe the measurements, and smuglly fool themselves into believing that there is nothing there. Maybe there are 2 meanings to the phrase "nothing can kill you".