Authors of SMR study reply to NuScale comments
https://www.ans.org/news/article-4040/authors-of-smr-study-reply-to-nuscale-comments/
[SadPanda]
(https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.c83627bd8d2139e234e70961cdd25b3b?rik=EtpEor4NgYVdWg&riu=http%3a%2f%2fwww.maxvelocitytactical.com%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2014%2f03%2fbutt-hurt-1.jpg&ehk=YqfeaU2zuy9tOKro26N%2bmoeeejHHJtIr4K1q%2bDOlsnY%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0)
[coffee]
Quote from: fiveeleven on Jun 16, 2022, 07:32
It would appear that some indigenous forum personnel may be empathetic toward the three educated stooges that authored the rebuttal. If one of the identified grievous errors was misidentifying the leader of a cuckoos nest committee, okay. Using the associative (maybe distributive) principle, BUTTHURT = ASSPLANT.
As I am the only one who commented on this you must mean me. You got it backwards Reyes made a technical response and the trio made an non sequitir administrative rebuttal to his response.
Just say'n
[coffee]
Quote from: fiveeleven on Jun 16, 2022, 02:24
That would indicate my synopsis of the read was bass ackwards. Wasnt the first offense, probably not the last. I stand corrected. O:)
Had chief in the Navy tell me that the people that make no mistakes are not doing anything.
[coffee]