NukeWorker Forum

News and Discussions => Nuke News => Topic started by: Marlin on Nov 09, 2022, 12:24

Title: Report links U-235 found in Ohio home to Portsmouth
Post by: Marlin on Nov 09, 2022, 12:24
Report links U-235 found in Ohio home to Portsmouth

https://www.ans.org/news/article-4481/report-links-u235-found-in-ohio-home-to-portsmouth/
Title: Re: Report links U-235 found in Ohio home to Portsmouth
Post by: Mounder on Nov 14, 2022, 03:37
More suspect journalism and shaky scientific reporting from U-Northern Arizona. "by a factor of 3.4 over normal background for U-235."  Fun with numbers and confusing those who don't understand how miniscule and within the expected range this is.  More people looking to get rich off the deep pockets of the US government.  Chances that the wind blew in that direction towards Lucasville: unlikely.  Potential mention of a PORTS worker previously living in the home: avoided by the author.   A lot of bad scheming people down there.
Title: Re: Report links U-235 found in Ohio home to Portsmouth
Post by: fiveeleven on Nov 15, 2022, 10:52
An increase by a factor of 3.4 is significant. For example: 1E-15uci/cc X 3.4 = 3.4E-15uci/cc. Sans scientific notation = .0000000000000034uci/cc. Add in +/- 20% and start mobilizing FEMA personnel.




















Title: Re: Report links U-235 found in Ohio home to Portsmouth
Post by: Mounder on Nov 16, 2022, 08:53
If we take a high WAG that the background U235 is .1 pCi/g in soil in southern OH (of course not mentioned in the article) and then multiply that by 3.4 = 0.34 pCi/g.  A DCGL is likely at least 5 pCi/g.  It's still a lot of nothing.  If the litigants want to chase remnant coal dust up and down the Norfolk Southern line that runs through Portsmouth, past Lucasville and all the way up to Columbus, I'm sure they can find more homes to claim. The open car- black billowing clouds were an amazing daily occurrence.
Title: Re: Report links U-235 found in Ohio home to Portsmouth
Post by: peteshonkwiler on Nov 22, 2022, 12:13
Quote from: Mounder on Nov 16, 2022, 08:53
If we take a high WAG that the background U235 is .1 pCi/g in soil in southern OH (of course not mentioned in the article) and then multiply that by 3.4 = 0.34 pCi/g.  A DCGL is likely at least 5 pCi/g.  It's still a lot of nothing.  If the litigants want to chase remnant coal dust up and down the Norfolk Southern line that runs through Portsmouth, past Lucasville and all the way up to Columbus, I'm sure they can find more homes to claim. The open car- black billowing clouds were an amazing daily occurrence.
👏👏👏