INL makes a case for eliminating ALARA and setting higher dose limits
https://www.ans.org/news/2025-07-30/article-7242/inl-makes-a-case-for-eliminating-alara-and-setting-higher-dose-limits/
wow!!!!!
we are occupational workers you know,....
There is no threshold, but a small % may develop radiation induced cancer. Workers are educated and accept the risk. Several humans bask in the sun and visit tanning booths exposing themselves to that risk. I haven't yet heard what INPOs reponse is.
Guaranteed the INPO mob will fight this to the end. ALARA and all that goes with it is one of their greatest allies in their never ending mission of busting coulliones !
Quote from: scotoma on Aug 06, 2025, 08:41There is no threshold, but a small % may develop radiation induced cancer. Workers are educated and accept the risk. Several humans bask in the sun and visit tanning booths exposing themselves to that risk. I haven't yet heard what INPOs reponse is.
The issue is the linear Non threshold model currently used. Radiation Hormesis is gaining momentum. Any study of low dose health effects starting with the million-mouse project have not been able to produce any conclusive results. On the practical side with the variation of background around the globe without a significant correlation to cancer rates, with the exception of Kerala beach in India, is the best indication that the linear model is not valid. The linear model is a conservative means of radiation exposure regulations without any conclusive data previously. We have radon spas hailed as curative. Medical exposure is a good indicator of radiation exposure effects; massive amounts of radiation are applied to kill off cancerous cells that to me tend to show the possible benefit to very low doses and supports the radiation hormesis theory (my opinion). Today I am going for another Catscan as a follow up on my cancer surgery, another 1000mrem determined to be in my best interest by my doctor.