I don't know how "good" I'd call the article.
The most egregious is: "Scientists from across the globe are searching for something better. Europe, Russia and Japan recycle spent fuel — meaning there is less waste to store. That practice was largely abandoned in the United States, because the process can produce weaponized plutonium, potentially sparking an international outcry."
No, it doesn't produce weaponized plutonium. It makes reactor grade which is no where near as good for making a bomb.
"The waste will be fatal to humans and other animals for tens of thousands of years — yet the storage tombs are expected to last only a hundred years."
I think that makes it sound way worse than reality. At 1000 years it isn't all that hot anymore.