I just got a PM from our buddy Quality Control:
sir,
I tried to reply to your response to my post about DeNuke, but evidently my privileges to respond have been revoked. I thought the company forum was the place to post about unsatisfactory company performance. While I admit that I only became a member to post, I do frequent your site as I am in the business. The experiences I described are true, based on my first hand knowledge. While I omitted details to avoid a defamatory situation, I did not generalize either. I mentioned that a "substantial portion" of DeNuke employees had issues - again, first hand knowledge, and the information about how they do business with their clients is first hand knowledge as well. The post is one opinion, just as valid as any of the others. It seems that you have unfairly censored me, and it also seems that you and the majority of those who immediately posted in response have a vested interest and their opinions reflect that. I've spoken to many techs, at Hanford and at Argonne, who feel otherwise, as I do. Word on the street - You want the bottom of the barrel, call DeNuke.
Have a good day sir.
Your privileges have not been altered. You have not been censored.Clicking on the
quote, or
reply buttons should work for you, just as it does for any user that is LOGGED IN.
It pisses me off SO MUSH when people cry that they have been censored. Was your post deleted? NO. And your privileges have not been altered in any way. Perhaps you are not capable of logging in before you click on quote, or reply. No wonder they let you go.
Let me get this straight, the OTHER 64 of us are wrong, and have a “Vested interest”, because we have had a positive interaction with the company for over five years? How long have you evaluated them? Five weeks? Five months?
You are allowed to say anything you want. I can’t and won’t protect you from being sued for libelous or slanderous words. But you are totally free to do so. Just don’t get your panties in a wad if we don’t agree with you. And don’t you EVER claim that I am censoring you. It just shows your poor character to come on a forum and anonymously defame a company. Then to make false accusations against me? Wow. That adds a ton of credibility to your previous statement.
My name is Michael Rennhack, and if I had a problem with a company, and wanted the world to know it, I’d use my name.
I’m sure you have these types of experiences with every company you deal with, they are always out to get you, huh? Surely it couldn’t be you.
Before you told lies about me, I was willing to entertain your comments as valid, even though they were different than my experiences. But now that you are telling lies about me too, I have no respect for you at all. I didn’t even smite you earlier, because I respect people that have differing opinions. I surely will smite you now, as I have no respect for liars.
You claim its firsthand knowledge that a “substantial portion” of their employees had problems. They probably have a thousand employees, how many do you know? And it’s only “First hand” if it’s YOU. Are you a substantial portion of their employees? If others are telling you, then it’s second knowledge. And if they tell you that they have herd others say it, its third hand at best.
You claim its firsthand knowledge about how they do business with their clients. Unless YOU are a client, it’s not FIRST HAND. Guess what? I AM a client. They do business with ME. I DO know FIRST HAND.
How about you say: “I heard from a guy that heard from a guy.”, because that sounds more accurate.
(You think I should have counted to ten before I posted this?)
You want to know my hot button? Tell me you are being censored.
Poll
