Sequoyah 2 vs Vogtle 1

Side-by-side Operational Excellence breakdown across 7 publicly observable performance dimensions.

Comparing Vogtle 1 and Sequoyah 2. Vogtle 1 leads on the composite score (54/100, Mid Quartile), 23 points ahead of Sequoyah 2. Vogtle 1 takes Reliability (49). Vogtle 1 takes Efficiency (64). Vogtle 1 takes Discipline (50).

Sequoyah 2

Tennessee Valley Authority · TN · PWR
Last refuel U2R26 · Jul 2024 (24 mo ago)
31/100
Bottom Quartile · #80/93
Reliability
20
Efficiency
29
Discipline
44

Vogtle 1

Southern Nuclear · GA · PWR
Last refuel 1R26 · Feb 2026 (5 mo ago)
54/100
Mid Quartile · #33/93
Reliability
49
Efficiency
64
Discipline
50

7-Dimension Radar Each axis = percentile rank in the active US fleet (higher = better)

Per-Dimension Percentile Breakdown

Dimension Sequoyah 2 Vogtle 1
Capacity Factor 5-year average capacity factor — total generation as a fraction of installed capacity. Higher is better; top operators sustain 92%+.
9
80.4%
56
92.2%
Forced Outage Days/yr 5-year forced outage days per year (annualised) — non-power days NOT explained by scheduled refueling. Lower is better.
14
9.4d
60
2.6d
B2B Avg Streak Average breaker-to-breaker continuous-operation days across this unit's qualifying B2B runs (lifetime). Higher is better; reflects sustained reliability.
38
510d
30
506d
Fuel Utilization Average in-cycle capacity factor (3-year). Fraction of each refueling cycle that produced full power. Higher = more efficient operator.
27
97.0%
53
98.1%
Refuel Duration 5-year median scheduled refueling outage duration in days (refuel-shaped outages, 14-90d). Lower = faster turnaround.
31
36d
76
25d
Startup Duration Robust mean days from first power post-refuel to sustained ≥95% power. Lower = faster ramp.
39
5.0d
71
3.6d
Scrams (5-year) Scrams per year, computed over the 5-year window (annualised so windows are comparable). Lower is better; reflects operating discipline and equipment reliability.
48
0.4/yr
29
0.6/yr