South Texas 1 vs South Texas 2

Side-by-side Operational Excellence breakdown across 7 publicly observable performance dimensions.

Comparing South Texas 1 and South Texas 2. South Texas 1 leads on the composite score (55/100, Mid Quartile), 14 points ahead of South Texas 2. South Texas 1 takes Reliability (41). South Texas 1 takes Efficiency (54). South Texas 1 takes Discipline (70).

South Texas 1

STP Nuclear Operating · TX · PWR
55/100
Mid Quartile · #32/93
Reliability
41
Efficiency
54
Discipline
70

South Texas 2

STP Nuclear Operating · TX · PWR
41/100
Mid Quartile · #61/93
Reliability
40
Efficiency
54
Discipline
29

7-Dimension Radar Each axis = percentile rank in the active US fleet (higher = better)

Per-Dimension Percentile Breakdown

Dimension South Texas 1 South Texas 2
Capacity Factor 5-year average capacity factor — total generation as a fraction of installed capacity. Higher is better; top operators sustain 92%+.
41
90.7%
50
91.5%
Forced Outage Days/yr 5-year forced outage days per year (annualised) — non-power days NOT explained by scheduled refueling. Lower is better.
38
4.8d
38
4.8d
B2B Avg Streak Average breaker-to-breaker continuous-operation days across this unit's qualifying B2B runs (lifetime). Higher is better; reflects sustained reliability.
45
513d
33
508d
Fuel Utilization Average in-cycle capacity factor (3-year). Fraction of each refueling cycle that produced full power. Higher = more efficient operator.
Refuel Duration 5-year median scheduled refueling outage duration in days (refuel-shaped outages, 14-90d). Lower = faster turnaround.
54
32d
54
32d
Startup Duration Robust mean days from first power post-refuel to sustained ≥95% power. Lower = faster ramp.
Scrams (5-year) Scrams per year, computed over the 5-year window (annualised so windows are comparable). Lower is better; reflects operating discipline and equipment reliability.
70
0.2/yr
29
0.6/yr