1) -A good idea would be to check out the bibliography, you can find this at CNET. There are questions regarding surface plants, sub plants (you have been taught an old sub plant of which there are only two operating, at prototype), and a lot of other stuff which you will not have a clue about (QA comes to mind). Best bet would be do what your Chief says, dont expect to get it, and if you do, be surprised.
A few other thoughts to your comments:
2)-Your next opportunity to take the exam will be in september.
3) -You have about as much "control" over what your eval says now as you will in prototype
4)-You call NNPS highschool, and compare it to how it used to be. I am not an old salt by any means, but how do you have a clue of what it used to be?
1) I have stated several times, Im not looking to get mm2, Im merely looking to get PNA points for september
2) September will give me even more time to study, pending I should be well past qualified at prototype
3) Our evals in school are based 100% off our grades/leadersihp positions. Only class leader, and people with 3.7+ get anything above 3.0 evals. is protoype the same way, or is it based off performance/leadership/military requirements?
4) I will call it rickover high for several reasons. 1) a LOT of people still dont know they are in the military, 2) the amount of grabassing that goes around is disgusting. Proffesionalism here is at a very low level 3) I actually speak with all my instructors more then most students, so I have gotten a good feel of what NNPTC used to be like (cheaters were GONE, nowadays most get 2nd chances; Field days EVERY FRIDAY, not once every 2 months; Pounding chalk all day vs using a computer mouse; military requirements much higher/strict. I was put in the wrong decade!

)
I hear half the test is BMR, and the other half is what our inrate is going to be. Is this test the same for conventional MM's? Or is it nuke specific?
Thanks everyone