Troy,
Thankyou for your explanation of the round reactor bldg at Hope Creek. You were exactly correct.
Please reexplain tritium at CANDU's. Your description of the Canadian outage you worked is well worth recording here (green men, tritium sampling, etc.).
What measures do American plants have in place to prevent tritium contamination of drinking water systems.
How many nuclear workers are treated for heat exhaustion each outage season at US nuclear power plants.
Most of that would be off-topic. Besides, Hasher is far more qualified than I to elaborate on Canadian Nukes. He's still there.
But, as far as I know, American nukes do occasionally have Tritium problems in the ground water. These are not nearly as severe as the potential in CANDU plants.
The number of heat related worker-safety incidents at US nuclear outages is far too high. But, not all of this is solely caused by lack of drinking water. In all the forms - good or bad - available, water is generally supplied to workers in these areas. They fall out anyway. You can lead a nuke to Sqincher, but you can't make him drink.
The question posed here is not whether or not to supply water, but what is the best method to do it and prevent ingestion of contaminants. I go with the following, in more or less this order:
1. Separate clean areas with full body monitoring in areas of low heat load/work activity (where time is not a factor)
2. Proximity operated fountains in contaminated areas
3. Individual bottles
4. foot pedal operated fountains
5. a jug with paper cups
6. a cool mountain spring with huge pewter mugs carried to you by lovely young women in short shorts ...oops ... sorta drifted there ... thinking of Hooters again.
