And all I said was for the guy to proof read his posts, I didn't call him names like "idiot" or recommend that I shouldn't have ever been born. Guess it's more of that double standard officers are good for.
For a bunch of guys who will jump at the opportunity to point out a sailor has no business comparing a commercial SRO to a navy EOOW, you have no problem talking about the affects of marijuana without having tried it yourself.
What's meant by accusing someone of stirring the pot? Does that mean that the accused is making comments simply to be inflammatory for no good reason? Isn't that called playing the Devil's Advocate instead? Either way, this is a discussion forum, right? Shouldn't we be doing more than "Yes, I agree, mostly," "You're pretty much right," etc.? Forgive me for trying to carry on a discussion.
People who make personal attacks during a conversation are either:
1. Innately dumb
- or -
2. Have nothing genuine to add
- or -
3. Both 1 and 2
PB, very nice timing. GC, will probably read this early today and he won't be able to smite you until 1916.
for both of you...not that either of you deserve karma but the pissing match is fun to watch.
