Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Overcrowded SC Ptype?  

Author Topic: Overcrowded SC Ptype?  (Read 15654 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Donte9235

  • Guest
Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« on: Feb 24, 2009, 12:14 »
So the NY plant is'nt taking anymore guys from Pschool, There is a small hold div, but the rest are all being squeezed through SC Ptype. Any ideas on how this is gonna affect training? ELT selection? Bonuses? Low numbers in the fleet?
« Last Edit: Feb 25, 2009, 12:57 by Donte9235 »

Offline Preciousblue1965

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 687
  • Karma: 524
  • Gender: Male
  • "It is good for you, builds character"
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #1 on: Feb 24, 2009, 01:00 »
I know exactly how is going to affect training. 

There will be an "unofficial" freeze on failing students on watches due to the fact that there is no way to get all those students through in the time they have unless students pass every single watch they get.  There will be even looser standards than there are now due to there won't be enough time to actually hold students accountable for their knowledge.  Staff members are going to be required to put in 12 hour days in order to handle the increased demand for checkouts, training events, test grading, and helping students understand.  This is on top of the horrendous workload they are already under because of maintenance, and other needs. 

Off crew for students and staff might even go to two shifts, day and night shift to accomodate the extra work load. 

Staff EWS quals are going to be even harder to get due to trying to compete with students for watchbill slots.  Which will eventually lead to EWS qual seekers putting in insane hours trying to get cross crew slots(which is very hard to get).  Same thing for T-EOOW quals. 

ELTs school will probably end up getting either shortenend, or some ELT-Ts will be put on hold as they split the classes up into two sections per class.  ELT training group will probably be putting in day and night shifts. 

ALL of the above will have to be done using the same number of bodies that are currently allowed by the PTM.  I figure that this will lead to a possible increase in DUIs from staff and student, a few wrecks due to fatigue, and possibly some equipment damage.  I truly hope that I am very wrong on these predictions.
"No good deal goes unpunished"

"Explain using obscene hand jestures the concept of pump laws"

I have found the cure for LIBERALISM, it is a good steady dose of REALITY!

NukeNub

  • Guest
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #2 on: Feb 24, 2009, 01:31 »
Maybe the Navy/Bechtel can hire former enlisted nuke instructors as civilian contractors to  augment the training staff. You don't need to seek out engineers, but former instructors that can go back through some refresher training and do stuff like give check outs, proctor and grade exams, conduct training exercises and seminars, etc, etc.

Hell, I could probably do a sat (albeit rusty) primary sample right now and give a check out on chemistry.


Offline Preciousblue1965

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 687
  • Karma: 524
  • Gender: Male
  • "It is good for you, builds character"
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #3 on: Feb 24, 2009, 02:03 »
Maybe the Navy/Bechtel can hire former enlisted nuke instructors as civilian contractors to  augment the training staff. You don't need to seek out engineers, but former instructors that can go back through some refresher training and do stuff like give check outs, proctor and grade exams, conduct training exercises and seminars, etc, etc.

Hell, I could probably do a sat (albeit rusty) primary sample right now and give a check out on chemistry.



not a bad idea.  I really feel that are going to have to address the issure very very soon because if what I predict actually occurs and staff members end up on 12+ hour shifts, I can almost guarantee that anyone who had orders to NPTU in SC is going to be calling their detailer and requesting to change those orders or cancel them outright.  Thus further complicating the matter with even more undermanning. Even if they "force" those guys to go there anyways, what kind of instructors or training program are you going to have with all these bitter people being forced into the pervierbial hell hole.
"No good deal goes unpunished"

"Explain using obscene hand jestures the concept of pump laws"

I have found the cure for LIBERALISM, it is a good steady dose of REALITY!

JustinHEMI05

  • Guest
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2009, 02:24 »
Trust me when I say take caution in what you post about on this site, in so far as the prototype operational capabilities are concerned. I am not saying anyone has said anything out of line yet, just fair warning.

Justin

JustinHEMI05

  • Guest
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2009, 08:24 »
Just so everyone knows that I am not insane, I am not going crazy digging up old threads. There was a post made today by someone that prompted my warning. They apparently took my advice on board and removed their comments. :)

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2009, 09:22 »
Just so everyone knows that I am not insane, I am not going crazy digging up old threads. There was a post made today by someone that prompted my warning. They apparently took my advice on board and removed their comments. :)

"The strawberries, that's where I had them..."


JustinHEMI05

  • Guest
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2009, 11:05 »
 ;D :P Perfect! Great movie!

Justin

Offline War Eagle

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • Karma: 327
  • Gender: Male
  • PWR SRO
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2009, 07:25 »
I second Justin's warning. I know for a fact that people troll these boards looking for that sort of thing.

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2009, 06:26 »
You mean like these fresh-faced cadets at the PLA Cyberwarfare academy? naaaah....

http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/chinahackers.png

Offline War Eagle

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • Karma: 327
  • Gender: Male
  • PWR SRO
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2009, 08:05 »
You mean like these fresh-faced cadets at the PLA Cyberwarfare academy? naaaah....

Yeah, those guys too. I was thinking more about the people who can make life hell for a Navy Nuke who says the wrong thing.

Offline Preciousblue1965

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 687
  • Karma: 524
  • Gender: Male
  • "It is good for you, builds character"
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2009, 05:46 »
Yeah, those guys too. I was thinking more about the people who can make life hell for a Navy Nuke who says the wrong thing.

but I already did a tour at Prototype.....
"No good deal goes unpunished"

"Explain using obscene hand jestures the concept of pump laws"

I have found the cure for LIBERALISM, it is a good steady dose of REALITY!

Offline juggalonic

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Karma: 6
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #12 on: Jun 22, 2009, 09:43 »
This is going to do wonders on Nuke retention.  You know what else is a good idea? Can or reduce all bonuses for these overworked few that staff the prototypes.  Like everything else in such a large bureaucracy, the pendulum will swing.  Too many people get out, bonuses go sky high, too many people reenlist (combined with cut in defense spending) and bonuses go away.

This is troublesome, BUT

but I already did a tour at Prototype.....

Sucks to be those in the pipeline now, but they will have better stories to tell from their experiences.

Offline Tha Hippo

  • Very Lite User
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: 3
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #13 on: Jul 23, 2009, 10:22 »
Hey you all. I just created my account on here. Ive been browsing the forums for over a year now. I am in prototype down here in SC. I am a mechanic at the end of my fifth week of training. They are definately pushing alot more people through the program. My class is the biggest one to go through prototype ever. We have some 260 students and every class from here on out is getting bigger. Because of the backup in NY prototype i was on hold after power school for 2 months and now there are permanent hold groups after every power school class. They have so many students at NNPTC now that they are giving hold students BAH. Also when I was leaving 0906 was expected to be a 13 section power school class and getting bigger with each class. Just yesterday we removed all of our normal desks in the offcrew classrooms and replaced them with smaller ones so more people could fit in the class. It is crazy how many people are going through. Beginning with our class students are allowed to double up on in rate checkouts so getting qualified and staying ahead of the curve isnt impossible. The staff are working longer hours too to keep people from being DINQ. If there are any other questions I have the skinny on it. But I have one question to ask of anyone that is currently out of the navy and working at a civilian power plant. I want to know if being an ELT is worth it. I dont care about who works longer or anything and i am definately getting out after 6 because there are not any more re-enlistment bonuses. I just want to be as marketable as I can to the civilian market

withroaj

  • Guest
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #14 on: Jul 23, 2009, 10:52 »
I'm still in the Navy, so take this how you want.  Usually you don't make yourself marketable in a competitive, professional field by saying you're definitely quitting your current job while you're still in school. 

Offline Tha Hippo

  • Very Lite User
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: 3
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #15 on: Jul 23, 2009, 11:00 »
im not saying im going to quit. I am going to fulfill my contract. The job is easy. All the job requires is a little brainpower. All im saying is that i want to be as marketable as i can by the time i get out and im wondering what i have to do. I am just using the navy as a stepping stone for the rest of my life. I just need some helpful guidance as to what the best course is for the rest of my time in the navy as to making my transition into a civilian job as seamless and comfortable as possible. Money is what makes the world go round and i plan on keeping it goin around

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #16 on: Jul 23, 2009, 11:20 »
1. I am a mechanic at the end of my fifth week of training.

2. If there are any other questions I have the skinny on it.

3. But I have one question to ask of anyone that is currently out of the navy and working at a civilian power plant. I want to know if being an ELT is worth it.

4.   I dont care about who works longer or anything and i am definately getting out after 6 because there are not any more re-enlistment bonuses. I just want to be as marketable as I can to the civilian market

1. With items #1 and #3, I'm sure at least some of the training staff knows who you are, so ...

2. I recommend you strictly observe OPSEC if you do get questions

3. Since there are too many bodies in training and ELT is a rare commodity, part of the competition other than grades might just be your evals, attitude towards staying in, etc. Remember, there is a selection process for a reason, return on investment might play into it

4. 6 and out assumes there will be plum jobs aplenty, just waiting to be picked from the tree with cool morning dew still upon them. Without EWS, ELT or a degree when you reach EAOS...not so much.

Offline Smooth Operator

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
  • Karma: 532
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #17 on: Jul 24, 2009, 07:48 »
1. With items #1 and #3, I'm sure at least some of the training staff knows who you are, so ...

2. I recommend you strictly observe OPSEC if you do get questions

3. Since there are too many bodies in training and ELT is a rare commodity, part of the competition other than grades might just be your evals, attitude towards staying in, etc. Remember, there is a selection process for a reason, return on investment might play into it

4. 6 and out assumes there will be plum jobs aplenty, just waiting to be picked from the tree with cool morning dew still upon them. Without EWS, ELT or a degree when you reach EAOS...not so much.

ELT is worth it. It has set me up for an integrated involvement in nuclear power. I have experienced ELT in its three distinct commericial jobs (Chemistry, Radiation Protection, and Operations) and it has allowed me to build ties between depts. faster because I can speak the language between techs of all 3 flavors.

I regret not getting my EWS when I had the chance, but I did get a degree.

I am going back for a 2nd degree in engineering.

ELT is what you will make of it, don't forget you still have 2 hands to turn valves...outside the PSS.

DSO

  • Guest
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #18 on: Jul 24, 2009, 10:13 »
I'm still in the Navy, so take this how you want.  Usually you don't make yourself marketable in a competitive, professional field by saying you're definitely quitting your current job while you're still in school.  
Cheez--the "digitness" makes my stomach hurt--not everyone wants to be a friggin "CPO" or stay in beyond 6 yrs--Saying you have plans to get out has nothing to do with your marketability in the civilian world--just marketability on making khaki maybe
« Last Edit: Jul 24, 2009, 10:14 by DSO »

JustinHEMI05

  • Guest
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #19 on: Jul 24, 2009, 12:28 »
I'm still in the Navy, so take this how you want.  Usually you don't make yourself marketable in a competitive, professional field by saying you're definitely quitting your current job while you're still in school.  

I personally find it refreshing that someone actually admits they have definite plans to only use the Navy to get to the next level. Nothing wrong with honesty and there is nothing wrong with his plan. There is no requirement to pretend that you intend on making a career out of the Navy (although I admit, he may have to in order to get higher quals).

As for marketability, I have to go with what hydro said. Try your best to get EWS quals. ELT might help, but it depends on a lot of things, but I generally agree with what Jason K said, being an ex-ELT myself. Being a 6 year nuke is the biggest thing. It will at least allow you to apply for NLO jobs and the like. But as someone has said before, 6 and out nukes are a dime a dozen, so try to make yourself stand out from the rest somehow. EWS, ELT, degree, as many schools as you can get, etc.

Good luck and thanks for your service! Thank you for being honest with us and yourself, as well!

Justin
« Last Edit: Jul 24, 2009, 12:29 by JustinHEMI »

Offline Preciousblue1965

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 687
  • Karma: 524
  • Gender: Male
  • "It is good for you, builds character"
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #20 on: Jul 24, 2009, 08:41 »
Hey you all. I just created my account on here. Ive been browsing the forums for over a year now. I am in prototype down here in SC. I am a mechanic at the end of my fifth week of training. They are definately pushing alot more people through the program. My class is the biggest one to go through prototype ever. We have some 260 students and every class from here on out is getting bigger. Because of the backup in NY prototype i was on hold after power school for 2 months and now there are permanent hold groups after every power school class. They have so many students at NNPTC now that they are giving hold students BAH. Also when I was leaving 0906 was expected to be a 13 section power school class and getting bigger with each class. Just yesterday we removed all of our normal desks in the offcrew classrooms and replaced them with smaller ones so more people could fit in the class. It is crazy how many people are going through. Beginning with our class students are allowed to double up on in rate checkouts so getting qualified and staying ahead of the curve isnt impossible. The staff are working longer hours too to keep people from being DINQ. If there are any other questions I have the skinny on it. But I have one question to ask of anyone that is currently out of the navy and working at a civilian power plant. I want to know if being an ELT is worth it. I dont care about who works longer or anything and i am definately getting out after 6 because there are not any more re-enlistment bonuses. I just want to be as marketable as I can to the civilian market

you know what the worst part about this post is.....

This is almost exactly what was predicted to happen.  Staff working longer hours simply to keep students ahead of the curve.  Lower standards in In-Rate checkouts now being doubled up.  The increased class sizes have to be having a negative effect on training levels, and so on and so forth.  Why doesn't someone see the writing on the wall and realize that they can "slice and dice" their way out of this problem by simply re-upping the standards to what they used to be, thus reducing class sizes.  Yea I know, they will only end up running into a shortage somewhere down the line. 
"No good deal goes unpunished"

"Explain using obscene hand jestures the concept of pump laws"

I have found the cure for LIBERALISM, it is a good steady dose of REALITY!

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #21 on: Jul 24, 2009, 09:13 »
Once that "Building  65" is up on keelblocks for Decom in ~2013 , it should be possible to raise standards when the number of billets goes down sharply

Offline Preciousblue1965

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 687
  • Karma: 524
  • Gender: Male
  • "It is good for you, builds character"
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #22 on: Jul 25, 2009, 12:25 »
Once that "Building  65" is up on keelblocks for Decom in ~2013 , it should be possible to raise standards when the number of billets goes down sharply

That is assuming we don't have many more Ike or Roosevelt incidents that lead to several personnel being "denuked" or worse. 
"No good deal goes unpunished"

"Explain using obscene hand jestures the concept of pump laws"

I have found the cure for LIBERALISM, it is a good steady dose of REALITY!

NHOY

  • Guest
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #23 on: Jul 25, 2009, 03:29 »
job is easy. All the job requires is a little brainpower.

First of all you are in the pipeline still, you have no clue on what the job is yet.  Second the job is not easy in the Fleet, it is only easy to the S-bags, those who continue to strive to be the best whether that is for a 6 year contrat or 30 years of service know that it is a hard job.  And my third and final point is yes brainpower is a vital requirement of our job but it takes a lot more than just brains, how about work ethic, and integrity. 

withroaj

  • Guest
Re: Overcrowded SC Ptype?
« Reply #24 on: Jul 26, 2009, 02:41 »
Cheez--the "digitness" makes my stomach hurt--not everyone wants to be a friggin "CPO" or stay in beyond 6 yrs--Saying you have plans to get out has nothing to do with your marketability in the civilian world--just marketability on making khaki maybe

Well, I stepped in poo here.  I'm not in this game gunning for CPO, and I'm not the type to say that anyone/everyone should do the same.  I would consider myself far from being a diggit, as well.  I see myself as more of a realist when it comes to Navy matters.  I don't imagine I'll stay in the Navy past my current EAOS (unless some great shore duty opens up -- pretty unlikely), but I don't base that on just five weeks of Prototype.  At that point it seems better to focus on finishing quals than post-Navy employment (though it is probably more important to plan to get out than it is to plan on staying in...).  I would also say that if you won't reenlist because the bonuses are gone, why would you reenlist at all?  A big chunk of change in your checking account won't make the job any better, right?

The lack of bonuses is a temporary thing.  I'd imagine that next fiscal year will hold another 90k fire sale on nuke bonuses, and that the retention goals will still be met.  I think the lack of bonuses as it is now will work out better for people.  If they have to wait until bonus season they might have the operational experience to make a decision in spite of the dollar bills waving in their faces.

/backpedaling rant

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?