Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu LDO vs STA21?
honeypot

Author Topic: LDO vs STA21?  (Read 12140 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mizzyung

  • Guest
LDO vs STA21?
« on: Jan 09, 2011, 11:21 »
Hello, I've been searching the forum trying to find a post that may be of assistance but having no such luck. I'm just looking for basically the pros and cons for both LDO and STA21 in order to compare the two to make a decision on which is a better choice. I know somewhat about STA21 but am unfamiliar with the LDO path. Any input on either one would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Offline SA82

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Karma: 11
  • Gender: Male
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #1 on: Jan 10, 2011, 02:23 »
Limited Duty Officer selection is based more on being a technical expert in a sailor's field. Experience is what a selection board looks at when making their decisions.

Its covered in OPNAVINST 1420.1b:
http://www.npc.navy.mil/NR/rdonlyres/52D8E8AC-D637-4DA2-8EF8-4ED86D39DCBE/0/14201B.pdf


For LDO: active duty personnel must have completed at least 8, but not more than 16 years of active Naval Service.

E6 applicants must complete all eligibility requirements for E7 (except TIR and Leadership Training Continuum (LTC)) and must successfully compete in the annual Navy-wide examination for advancement to CPO, receiving a final multiple equal to, or greater than, the minimum final multiple for E7 selection board eligibility.

The LDO selects that I know had orders to become officers aboard ships and subs that were about to go into the shipyard. They became the maintenance coordinators for their crew. Acting as a liaison between the yard officers and the ship's CO.

I have seen a lot of LDOs working at shipyards for their shore duty tours. For Nuke LDOs, their technical expertise is valued greatly at shipyards.

Cycoticpenguin

  • Guest
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #2 on: Jan 10, 2011, 07:52 »
Seeing as your husband is inelligable for LDO yet, heres a good place to start

http://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php/topic,25930.new.html#new

Offline Gamecock

  • Subject Matter Expert
  • *
  • Posts: 1202
  • Karma: 2367
  • Gender: Male
  • "Perfection is the enemy of good enough."
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #3 on: Jan 10, 2011, 08:27 »
Limited Duty Officer selection is based more on being a technical expert in a sailor's field. Experience is what a selection board looks at when making their decisions.

Its covered in OPNAVINST 1420.1b:
http://www.npc.navy.mil/NR/rdonlyres/52D8E8AC-D637-4DA2-8EF8-4ED86D39DCBE/0/14201B.pdf


For LDO: active duty personnel must have completed at least 8, but not more than 16 years of active Naval Service.

E6 applicants must complete all eligibility requirements for E7 (except TIR and Leadership Training Continuum (LTC)) and must successfully compete in the annual Navy-wide examination for advancement to CPO, receiving a final multiple equal to, or greater than, the minimum final multiple for E7 selection board eligibility.

The LDO selects that I know had orders to become officers aboard ships and subs that were about to go into the shipyard. They became the maintenance coordinators for their crew. Acting as a liaison between the yard officers and the ship's CO.

I have seen a lot of LDOs working at shipyards for their shore duty tours. For Nuke LDOs, their technical expertise is valued greatly at shipyards.

As an aside, I think every good junior first class should put an LDO application in whether they want to become an LDO or not because it allows them a "free" chance to take the CPO exam prior to actually being eligible.
“If the thought police come... we will meet them at the door, respectfully, unflinchingly, willing to die... holding a copy of the sacred Scriptures in one hand and the US Constitution in the other."

mizzyung

  • Guest
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #4 on: Jan 10, 2011, 11:00 »
As an aside, I think every good junior first class should put an LDO application in whether they want to become an LDO or not because it allows them a "free" chance to take the CPO exam prior to actually being eligible.

That is a very good point...thanks everyone

Cycoticpenguin

  • Guest
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #5 on: Jan 11, 2011, 12:50 »
As an aside, I think every good junior first class should put an LDO application in whether they want to become an LDO or not because it allows them a "free" chance to take the CPO exam prior to actually being eligible.

still needs 2 years payed e-6. He's not payed yet.

mizzyung

  • Guest
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #6 on: Jan 11, 2011, 02:01 »
still needs 2 years payed e-6. He's not payed yet.

Yeah, but he still has 4 years here and will only be 24 by then so the clock isn't ticking against him or anything. This has just been a debate for like the past year when everyone started pressuring him to go Sta21

Cycoticpenguin

  • Guest
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #7 on: Jan 11, 2011, 05:10 »
Yeah, but he still has 4 years here and will only be 24 by then so the clock isn't ticking against him or anything. This has just been a debate for like the past year when everyone started pressuring him to go Sta21

If he wants officer, STA-21 at this point will be faster and he will be an unrestricted line officer and could command a ship if he wanted to. He would be better off speaking to his career counselors, not to mention, LDO's and STA21 officers in person to get an idea as well.  As gamecock mentioned, the real benefit of LDO is you can take the chief exam early to get experience on it.


Offline still_in

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 45
  • Karma: 39
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #8 on: Jan 11, 2011, 06:12 »
One thing to keep in mind with STA-21 now that your spouse is not part of the training pipeline is that he can no longer apply for the Nuke option. This may hurt his selection chances as it is much easier to get picked up Nuke as a Nuke than to get picked up for options outside rates.

Offline MMM

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 582
  • Karma: 79
  • Gender: Male
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #9 on: Jan 11, 2011, 06:34 »
I would say, unless he wants to be a nuke officer, apply for STA-21. At worst, he doesn't get selected, at best, he does. When he's eligible for LDO, if he's still interested, apply for that as well.

As a side note, either way, he should start taking college courses now (if he hasn't already). If he gets a degree before being accepted to STA-21, then he can apply for OCS.

mizzyung

  • Guest
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #10 on: Jan 12, 2011, 01:55 »
One thing to keep in mind with STA-21 now that your spouse is not part of the training pipeline is that he can no longer apply for the Nuke option.

WHat do you mean?

mizzyung

  • Guest
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #11 on: Jan 12, 2011, 01:56 »
I would say, unless he wants to be a nuke officer, apply for STA-21. At worst, he doesn't get selected, at best, he does. When he's eligible for LDO, if he's still interested, apply for that as well.

As a side note, either way, he should start taking college courses now (if he hasn't already). If he gets a degree before being accepted to STA-21, then he can apply for OCS.

Thank you...he has mentioned OCS as well

Offline still_in

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 45
  • Karma: 39
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #12 on: Jan 12, 2011, 02:39 »
One thing to keep in mind with STA-21 now that your spouse is not part of the training pipeline is that he can no longer apply for the Nuke option.

WHat do you mean?

"Enlisted Source: Due to the high priority of nuclear officer recruiting, a specific number of STA-21 seats are reserved for enlisted personnel who have successfully completed or are enrolled in the nuclear power training pipeline. The only applicants eligible to apply for this option are those who are currently:

enrolled in Naval Nuclear Power School (NAVNUPWRSCOL) or Naval Nuclear Power Training Unit (NAVNUPWRTRAU); or
assigned to NAVNUPWRTRAU or Fleet Interactive Display Equipment (FIDE) Trainer as staff pickup instructors or sea returnee instructors."

Thats directly from the STA-21 website. Eligible for other options in STA-21 just not Nuke.

Offline Gamecock

  • Subject Matter Expert
  • *
  • Posts: 1202
  • Karma: 2367
  • Gender: Male
  • "Perfection is the enemy of good enough."
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #13 on: Jan 12, 2011, 04:11 »
"Enlisted Source: Due to the high priority of nuclear officer recruiting, a specific number of STA-21 seats are reserved for enlisted personnel who have successfully completed or are enrolled in the nuclear power training pipeline. The only applicants eligible to apply for this option are those who are currently:

enrolled in Naval Nuclear Power School (NAVNUPWRSCOL) or Naval Nuclear Power Training Unit (NAVNUPWRTRAU); or
assigned to NAVNUPWRTRAU or Fleet Interactive Display Equipment (FIDE) Trainer as staff pickup instructors or sea returnee instructors."

Thats directly from the STA-21 website. Eligible for other options in STA-21 just not Nuke.

He can always apply for "core" and still go nuclear after commissioning.
“If the thought police come... we will meet them at the door, respectfully, unflinchingly, willing to die... holding a copy of the sacred Scriptures in one hand and the US Constitution in the other."

Offline still_in

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 45
  • Karma: 39
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #14 on: Jan 12, 2011, 05:50 »
He can always apply for "core" and still go nuclear after commissioning.

Thanks GC, meant applying for nuclear option.

mizzyung

  • Guest
Re: LDO vs STA21?
« Reply #15 on: Jan 12, 2011, 10:19 »
Thank you everyone. Inputting all this info into my personal database to discuss with him later. All is appreciated.

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?