Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest honeypot

Author Topic: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest  (Read 30362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Umayrkaleem

  • Lurker
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: 0
Want to enlist as a Nuke in the Navy.  Told my recruiter that, told me I would get it as long as they had it available since my test scores qualified.  254(EI,AR,MK,GS) and 232 for the other set of line scores. Listed under NUC on my score sheet.  

Recruiter took me to meps , did my physical stuff. While waiting for the job interview thing, Nuke coordinator came upstairs told me that he didn't have any spots open right now.  He will have to send in some stuff (high school grades, 33 college credit grades, and back ground checks, and based on my nationality he'll have to double check since my parents were born outside the U.S) to 3 of his bosses above him.  Told me to sign for a job right now and get the furthest date out.  Okay I was the last person to get the job, got SECF and I didnt get to swear in or anything so I shouldn't have a contract? Since I was the last person to get his job I didnt get the chance to swear in at the ceremony.  Told me I have to come back this week.  I really dont think I would like this SECF job, what are the career opportunities for this after my military career?  I don't want to do anything other than Nuke.  My recruiter is being really pushy about me just signing for any job and saying this is how enlisting for a nuke is done.  All my other military friends are telling me don't sign for anything unless its in the contract.  I don't want to join the navy right now unless I get accepted in this nuke program. Also when I called the Nuke coordinator back, he was telling me to sign for another position and I was like can I just not sign and wait for me to get accepted? There was a long pause and he was like its going to take about a month to figure out if youre accepted or not, its better to go ahead and sign your contract now.
« Last Edit: Aug 20, 2012, 03:23 by Umayrkaleem »

Offline Umayrkaleem

  • Lurker
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: 0
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #1 on: Aug 20, 2012, 03:36 »
I just want Nuke to be in contract that's all, I don't care if MM, EM, or ET is in my contract.  I totally understand that's all decided based on the need's of the Navy which I can totally work with.  I just really like physics and math.  Shouldn't have my recruiter talked to the Nuke coordinator before I went to Meps to make sure I could get through this program and be allowed to join?

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6293
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #2 on: Aug 20, 2012, 08:50 »
its better to go ahead and sign your contract now.

That shows you that to the recruiter, your enlistment is simply a snack on his quota, and they could care less if you get nuke or not. Simply tell them you aren't coming back until they have Nuke.

Then again, poker is a 2-way bluffing game, and they may be telling the truth or bluffing if they say fine, there isn't an opening for 2 months. Do you have the guts to say no and wait?

Offline Higgs

  • SRO
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • Karma: 1284
  • Gender: Male
  • Life has a melody...
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #3 on: Aug 20, 2012, 12:09 »
Do NOT sign a contract for something you DO NOT want. Simple.

Justin
"How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic.” - Ted Nugent

Offline DontGoToNPTU

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 51
  • Karma: 17
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #4 on: Aug 20, 2012, 12:53 »
What Higgs said. If they tell you you can rerate to nuke when you get to boot camp they aren't really telling you a lie, they are just simply omiting the fact that it isn't likely. If you want nuke sign up for nuke.

I'll give you a little back story since I have some time. Right now there is a HUGE hold pool of students between Power School and Prototype. Up until a few months ago that hold pool wasn't going to be cleared until sometime between 2020 and 2030, which would cost the government about 230 million dollars to pay those students on hold until the pool was cleared. A few months ago a plan was put into place to get this pool cleared by sometime in late 2014/ early 2015. This puts prototype well above it's maximum capacity.

Now, how does this relate to you? To make this plan work they can't take in a single sailor above their quarterly quota. Go back on October first the minute the recruting office opens and say give me nuke or stick it where the sun don't shine.

Offline Higgs

  • SRO
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • Karma: 1284
  • Gender: Male
  • Life has a melody...
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #5 on: Aug 20, 2012, 01:44 »
So, if there is such a back log of students, you'd think they would install some filters at the discharge of the high head charging pumps.

Justin
"How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic.” - Ted Nugent

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6293
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #6 on: Aug 20, 2012, 02:45 »
So, if there is such a back log of students, you'd think they would install some filters at the discharge of the high head charging pumps.

Justin

Or a 105 second bottom blowdown, as in the pre-DigiCamo days?  8)

Offline Styrofoam

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
  • Karma: 104
  • Gender: Female
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #7 on: Aug 20, 2012, 03:04 »
Jeez. Why does this conversation always come up?

I initially signed a contract for AECF while I was waiting for a nuke job to open up. Your recruiter isn't lying to you. That's really how it's done these days. I emphasize these days because some people's experiences are more recent than others.

Anyway, they get you to sign a contract so they'll have more confidence that you'll actually go to boot camp. However, what most people who sign those contracts don't know and your recruiter won't tell you is that you don't have to go to bootcamp under that contract. All you'd have to do is tell them you don't want to go anymore. Yeah, it may have an adverse affect on getting in the military in the future, but if it comes down to it (which it probably won't) you can use that knowledge to "push" the recruiter to work harder to get you a nuke spot.

Offline eaton1981

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
  • Karma: 19
  • Gender: Male
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #8 on: Aug 21, 2012, 05:10 »
Do NOT sign a contract for anything you do not want. Just like Higgs said.

DO NOT SIGN A CONTRACT FOR ANOTHER RATE ANTICIPATING A NUKE SPOT OPENING UP AND THEN BOW OUT OF DEP ONCE YOU REALIZE A NUCLEAR STUDENT BILLET ISN'T OPENING UP. Getting back into DEP is a pain in the ass and requires a lot of hurdles to jump through compared to just waiting for nuke to open up (you can find the recruitment instructions online with minimal effort). The most recent info I got on this (last week from a nuke recruiter out near Chicago) is that it takes them (his recruiting district) about a year for someone who dropped out of DEP to get back in.

Wait until a nuke spot opens before joining into DEP.


Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6293
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #9 on: Aug 21, 2012, 05:39 »
This thread is like a vortex....I should bet anyone a real biscuits 'n gravy breakfast we get another nub in here within 3 weeks, who just tested and signed for Aviation Boatswain's Mate but wants Nuke at MEPS..... any takers?  :P

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5503
  • Karma: 2525
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #10 on: Aug 21, 2012, 06:08 »
This thread is like a vortex....I should bet anyone a real biscuits 'n gravy breakfast we get another nub in here within 3 weeks, who just tested and signed for Aviation Boatswain's Mate but wants Nuke at MEPS..... any takers?  :P

define "real",...

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6293
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #11 on: Aug 21, 2012, 06:34 »
define "real",...

not cooked by me, but by highly experienced folks

real white pepper, real corn-fed pork sausage, not the tumbleweeds-and-restaurant-scraps-with-plastic-wrappers fed stuff under the generic store brands, silky smooth gravy.

portions adequate for even the largest long-haul trucker

a B&G I don't mind buying, because I'll be having some too! And it's fairly close to the original Route 66...

holicisms

  • Guest
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #12 on: Sep 13, 2012, 10:14 »
I had to sign for AECF while I waited for my nuc paperwork to go through. It's really no big deal.

You should make sure that this is what you REALLY want though. I'm not particularly enjoying the training myself, and I've been on voluntary hours since day one of  a school. (I'm not in second half power school)

I can only imagine the pile of dicks that you'd have if you were on 3s, 4s, or even 5s

Offline yota

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
  • Karma: 33
  • Gender: Male
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #13 on: Sep 13, 2012, 10:23 »
I had to sign for AECF while I waited for my nuc paperwork to go through. It's really no big deal.

You should make sure that this is what you REALLY want though. I'm not particularly enjoying the training myself, and I've been on voluntary hours since day one of  a school. (I'm not in second half power school)

I can only imagine the pile of dicks that you'd have if you were on 3s, 4s, or even 5s

It only gets better as you go further through the pipeline shipmate!  :P

My initial contract was Sonar Tech (STG), signing something shows commitment, but nothing is final until you ship out to RTC.

Offline Already Gone

  • Curmudgeon At Large
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1769
  • Karma: 3388
  • Gender: Male
  • Did I say that out loud?
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #14 on: Sep 15, 2012, 11:31 »
Signing a contract is signing a contract.  All this crap about "that is the way it is done" doesn't mean a damned thing.  You want to be a nuke; they want your ass in the Navy.  If you do what they say, they get what they want -- you get hosed.  All this DEP BS is just that, BS.  You either in the Navy or you are NOT in the Navy.  As long as you are not in the Navy, the choices about your future are yours.  When you put a pen against a piece of paper and write your name on it, you have no more choices.  DEP is a terribly bad deal.  A DEPper is not in the Navy; he's OBLIGATED to the Navy, but not getting paid, not getting healthcare benefits, tuition assistance, or even government-provided cheeseburgers.  So, getting into DEP just to keep your spot in DEP is a stupid, stupid, stupid move.  DEP is not for your benefit.  It exists solely for the manpower management needs of the Navy.
While you're waiting, go get some more college credits.  By the time these jokers get their act together, you may have a BS -- and a LOT more choices.
"To be content with little is hard; to be content with much, impossible." - Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach

Offline MMM

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 582
  • Karma: 79
  • Gender: Male
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #15 on: Sep 15, 2012, 07:26 »
So, if there is such a back log of students, you'd think they would install some filters at the discharge of the high head charging pumps.

Justin

Because it won't help the back log. If we class up 100 students into prototype and filter out 20, only 80 get to the fleet. We can't just arbitrarily add new students in the middle of prototype. Now if you're talking about returning power school to the days of 30-50% attrition, you may be on to something.

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6293
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #16 on: Sep 15, 2012, 08:26 »
Now if you're talking about returning power school to the days of 30-50% attrition, you may be on to something.


Offline Higgs

  • SRO
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • Karma: 1284
  • Gender: Male
  • Life has a melody...
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #17 on: Sep 15, 2012, 10:28 »
^^^

Justinn
"How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic.” - Ted Nugent

Offline Gamecock

  • Subject Matter Expert
  • *
  • Posts: 1201
  • Karma: 2367
  • Gender: Male
  • "Perfection is the enemy of good enough."
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #18 on: Sep 16, 2012, 08:52 »
Signing a contract is signing a contract.  All this crap about "that is the way it is done" doesn't mean a damned thing.  You want to be a nuke; they want your ass in the Navy.  If you do what they say, they get what they want -- you get hosed.  All this DEP BS is just that, BS.  You either in the Navy or you are NOT in the Navy.  As long as you are not in the Navy, the choices about your future are yours.  When you put a pen against a piece of paper and write your name on it, you have no more choices.  DEP is a terribly bad deal.  A DEPper is not in the Navy; he's OBLIGATED to the Navy, but not getting paid, not getting healthcare benefits, tuition assistance, or even government-provided cheeseburgers.  So, getting into DEP just to keep your spot in DEP is a stupid, stupid, stupid move.  DEP is not for your benefit.  It exists solely for the manpower management needs of the Navy.
While you're waiting, go get some more college credits.  By the time these jokers get their act together, you may have a BS -- and a LOT more choices.

Incorrect.....
“If the thought police come... we will meet them at the door, respectfully, unflinchingly, willing to die... holding a copy of the sacred Scriptures in one hand and the US Constitution in the other."

Offline HighOctane23

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 29
  • Karma: 4
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #19 on: Sep 18, 2012, 07:02 »
Look, I literally just went through this process. I got my nuke contract 2 months ago. Not 2 years, not 5 years, or 10 years, or 20 years etc..., but 2 months! I've read posts from a lot of the older guys saying that they signed a contract and shipped out to boot camp practically the next day. That's not how it works anymore. I depped in on April 24, 2012 as an ABH with an original ship date of October 30th, 2012, got my Nuke reclass in July, and now don't ship out until April 15th, 2013. All said and done I'll be in DEP for nearly an entire year before I go to boot. The reason I had to reclass is because I had to wait on some waivers to be approved (age, dependents, and them thinking I was prior service even though I wasn't). Like someone else mentioned, the contract to get into DEP means practically nothing. They don't pay you or give you any types of financial benefits while in DEP, therefore you really don't have an obligation to stick around if you change your mind. By signing a contract you do show the recruiter that your serious about joining, and I believe it makes them more inclined to help you versus someone who says they are just waiting for the right job to open up.
That being said, my advice would be to go back on October 1st (thats when the new fiscal year begins and when a lot more jobs will open up) and let them know your serious about joining as a nuke. If you have to sign on as something else then fine, but be serious with your recruiter and tell him that you do not intend to keep the job that you have and may walk away unless its for nuke. That should get him on the ball to get you reclassed. People do get reclassed all the time nowadays, but just know that its not a guarantee that you will. It will also depend on any waivers you may need and your ability to obtain a security clearance. Your parents being foreigners may unfortunatly hold up the security clearance process for ya.

Offline Styrofoam

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
  • Karma: 104
  • Gender: Female
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #20 on: Sep 18, 2012, 07:05 »
Look, I literally just went through this process. I got my nuke contract 2 months ago. Not 2 years, not 5 years, or 10 years, or 20 years etc..., but 2 months! I've read posts from a lot of the older guys saying that they signed a contract and shipped out to boot camp practically the next day. That's not how it works anymore. I depped in on April 24, 2012 as an ABH with an original ship date of October 30th, 2012, got my Nuke reclass in July, and now don't ship out until April 15th, 2013. All said and done I'll be in DEP for nearly an entire year before I go to boot. The reason I had to reclass is because I had to wait on some waivers to be approved (age, dependents, and them thinking I was prior service even though I wasn't). Like someone else mentioned, the contract to get into DEP means practically nothing. They don't pay you or give you any types of financial benefits while in DEP, therefore you really don't have an obligation to stick around if you change your mind. By signing a contract you do show the recruiter that your serious about joining, and I believe it makes them more inclined to help you versus someone who says they are just waiting for the right job to open up.
That being said, my advice would be to go back on October 1st (thats when the new fiscal year begins and when a lot more jobs will open up) and let them know your serious about joining as a nuke. If you have to sign on as something else then fine, but be serious with your recruiter and tell him that you do not intend to keep the job that you have and may walk away unless its for nuke. That should get him on the ball to get you reclassed. People do get reclassed all the time nowadays, but just know that its not a guarantee that you will. It will also depend on any waivers you may need and your ability to obtain a security clearance. Your parents being foreigners may unfortunatly hold up the security clearance process for ya.

I've tried explaining that stuff to them. They still get on here everytime this conversation comes up and use their capslock button and their exclamation points. So I just throw in my 2 cents and if it hits the original poster, great. If not, oh well.

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5503
  • Karma: 2525
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #21 on: Sep 18, 2012, 08:18 »
.... I've read posts from a lot of the older guys saying that they signed a contract and shipped out to boot camp practically the next day....

All in all a nice story and I'm happy for ya but you're going to have to enlighten me as to where a lot of the older guys signed a contract and shipped out to boot practically the next day,...

I know of one older guy who presents his enlistment that way, but then, I'm "special" that way,...

No need to exaggerate as a nuke, NNPP life seems to have enough drama without any help from "bigging up" your stories nowadays,...

good luck, hope you make it to next tax day without a DUI,.....seriously,.... :-\

(when you enlighten me, please include links, lots of links, and that's a lookup  :P ;) :) 8))

(psssst, no need for CapsLock either,...heheheheheheh)

almost forgot,...(sic)
« Last Edit: Sep 18, 2012, 08:21 by GLW »

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

Offline Dorian52

  • Very Lite User
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Karma: 0
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #22 on: Sep 23, 2012, 03:59 »
I signed for Hospital Corpsman on June 25th and had an original shipping date of November 6th, 2012. The nuke recruiters at the MEPS came and scheduled me for a test so I came in the next week and passed it. I waited on waivers then resigned to nuke. Now my shipping date is April 2, 2013. But my recruiter did call me the other day and said that I might be able to leave this month. I'm praying on it haha.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 18978
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #23 on: Sep 23, 2012, 10:49 »
I signed for Hospital Corpsman on June 25th and had an original shipping date of November 6th, 2012. The nuke recruiters at the MEPS came and scheduled me for a test so I came in the next week and passed it. I waited on waivers then resigned to nuke. Now my shipping date is April 2, 2013. But my recruiter did call me the other day and said that I might be able to leave this month. I'm praying on it haha.

   We had some excellent Corpsman on the boats and the Marines are very protective of their Navy buddies assigned to them. I don't mean to demean the Nuke program I have benefited from it but it is usually better if you can follow your heart. Is Nuke what you really wanted?

Offline HighOctane23

  • Light User
  • **
  • Posts: 29
  • Karma: 4
Re: Enlistment Nuke, not sure if recruiter is being honest
« Reply #24 on: Sep 27, 2012, 04:15 »
All in all a nice story and I'm happy for ya but you're going to have to enlighten me as to where a lot of the older guys signed a contract and shipped out to boot practically the next day,...

I know of one older guy who presents his enlistment that way, but then, I'm "special" that way,...

No need to exaggerate as a nuke, NNPP life seems to have enough drama without any help from "bigging up" your stories nowadays,...

good luck, hope you make it to next tax day without a DUI,.....seriously,.... :-\

(when you enlighten me, please include links, lots of links, and that's a lookup  :P ;) :) 8))

(psssst, no need for CapsLock either,...heheheheheheh)

almost forgot,...(sic)

Look man, it's really not worth my time to argue with you about this and it's definitely not worth my time to try and go back through all the thousands of posts I've read in this forum over the last year or so looking for the ones that show what I'm talking about. All I know is I've heard more than a few retired sailors say that. Just because YOU only know one guy doesn't mean there aren't more, especially considering there's been how many sailors since the inception of the US Navy in 1775? I'll let you try and figure that one out. Anyway, I'm not saying I have anything against anyone who is now or has ever been in the Navy, especially the retired guys. I've got nothing but respect for them. All I was trying to get across is that things are different now. This isn't the same Navy my grandpa joined, not even the same one my uncle joined. Things are constantly changing and this is just one of them. Getting in and everything is different now then it used to be, thats all I'm saying.

And don't worry about me getting a DUI between now and tax day because I don't drive anyway, public transportation is just fine for me...lol

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2025 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?