Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Rogers in for Chu? honeypot
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Rogers in for Chu?  (Read 5815 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cheme09

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
  • Karma: 57
Rogers in for Chu?
« on: Dec 14, 2012, 03:13 »
Looks like Jim Rogers is being considered a contender for Energy Secretary.

If that's true, he sure knows how to play his cards right.  

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/11/politics/obama-cabinet/index.html

*edited to include the link I forgot to include on the first go-round
« Last Edit: Dec 14, 2012, 06:54 by cheme09 »
Logged

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5493
  • Karma: 2523
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: Rogers in for Chu?
« Reply #1 on: Dec 14, 2012, 03:26 »
non-starter
Logged

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Rogers in for Chu?
« Reply #2 on: Dec 14, 2012, 08:09 »
Most likely either Lauren Azar, Jeffrey Immelt or a Least Coast politician. The big big money associated with wind and solar make the job attractive.
Logged

drayer54

  • Guest
Re: Rogers in for Chu?
« Reply #3 on: Dec 14, 2012, 09:16 »
Quote from: HydroDave63 on Dec 14, 2012, 08:09
Most likely either Lauren Azar, Jeffrey Immelt or a Least Coast politician. The big big money associated with wind and solar make the job attractive.


I've already had my eye on some January GE Calls with a strike around 25.

If you buy the idea that private sector success leads to great government leadership... why not?
Logged

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5493
  • Karma: 2523
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: Rogers in for Chu?
« Reply #4 on: Dec 14, 2012, 09:37 »
Quote from: Drayer on Dec 14, 2012, 09:16
.....If you buy the idea that private sector success leads to great government leadership... why not?

#1 - Coal,...

#2 - Progress merger,...
Logged

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

drayer54

  • Guest
Re: Rogers in for Chu?
« Reply #5 on: Dec 14, 2012, 09:55 »
Quote from: GLW on Dec 14, 2012, 09:37
#1 - Coal,...

#2 - Progress merger,...
He could still be sold. I would argue that being involved in a bailout company would be his biggest strike.

I think he could do worse.

I'm talking Immelt here. He's been close to the President for awhile now. Jim Rodgers is indeed, a non-starter.
« Last Edit: Dec 14, 2012, 10:04 by Drayer »
Logged

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Rogers in for Chu?
« Reply #6 on: Dec 14, 2012, 10:17 »
Quote from: Drayer on Dec 14, 2012, 09:16


If you buy the idea that private sector success leads to great government leadership... why not?

I can't wait for my tax dollars to buy more $75/MWh wind.  >:(
Logged

MacGyver

  • Guest
Re: Rogers in for Chu?
« Reply #7 on: Dec 15, 2012, 01:41 »
Quote from: HydroDave63 on Dec 14, 2012, 10:17
I can't wait for my tax dollars to buy more $75/MWh wind.  >:(

Logged

Offline HydroDave63

  • Retired
  • *
  • Posts: 6295
  • Karma: 6629
Re: Rogers in for Chu?
« Reply #8 on: Sep 05, 2015, 09:08 »
Quote from: cheme09 on Dec 14, 2012, 03:13
Looks like Jim Rogers is being considered a contender for Energy Secretary.

If that's true, he sure knows how to play his cards right.  

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/11/politics/obama-cabinet/index.html

*edited to include the link I forgot to include on the first go-round

Still sounding like he wants the job...

http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/energy/former-duke-energy-ceo-jim-rogers-says-power-companies-doing-it-all-wrong/2243495
Logged

Offline Mounder

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 517
  • Karma: 27
  • Gender: Male
  • Tell Recruiters to use NukeWorker.com
Re: Rogers in for Chu?
« Reply #9 on: Sep 06, 2015, 09:31 »
What a glowing non-endorsement from the Tampa Bay Times.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?