Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu De Facto Disposal: The Dumbest Waste Solution honeypot

Author Topic: De Facto Disposal: The Dumbest Waste Solution  (Read 104 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 17156
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!

Offline Mounder

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 517
  • Karma: 27
  • Gender: Male
  • Tell Recruiters to use NukeWorker.com
Re: De Facto Disposal: The Dumbest Waste Solution
« Reply #1 on: Mar 15, 2024, 12:21 »
I still like my idea of leasing Mexican property adjacent to the border in SW Arizona.  very stable soil/geology for storage. Wipes out the permitting issues. Desolate on both sides of the border.  Probably would have to build a special highway to the location for AZ. Adds another layer of protection to the border which everyone is wound up on. Gives Mexico a revenue stream. Per the article, no one will ever bring it up or consider it because they're all being paid big tax dollars to store it on site.  They get paid and they don't care.  Politicians can get campaign dollars from the same on-site waste storage groups.  The article is right.
Why is there a pregnant lady pictured in the article pressing her belly against a waste cask?

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2024 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?