NukeWorker Forum

News and Discussions => Nuke News => Topic started by: SloGlo on Oct 03, 2018, 09:14

Title: trump administration considering hormesis implications four rad regs
Post by: SloGlo on Oct 03, 2018, 09:14
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5bb439bbe4b028e1fe38dd19/amp
Title: Re: trump administration considering hormesis implications four rad regs
Post by: SloGlo on Oct 03, 2018, 12:13
an udder article

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/10/meh-its-just-a-little-radiation-epa-may-alter-rules-on-exposure/
Title: Re: trump administration considering hormesis implications four rad regs
Post by: Marlin on Oct 03, 2018, 12:28
an udder article

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/10/meh-its-just-a-little-radiation-epa-may-alter-rules-on-exposure/ (https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/10/meh-its-just-a-little-radiation-epa-may-alter-rules-on-exposure/)

Interesting article, the proposed rule titled  Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science is a big step toward doing what works not what sounds good which I think is a big barrier in any regulation and future construction of Nukes. Trust me I'm a scientist sounds too much like hold my beer and watch this s@#t to me.
Title: Re: trump administration considering hormesis implications four rad regs
Post by: Mounder on Oct 04, 2018, 09:22
Televised media gave this about 1 minute of coverage, which is more than I expected.  They seemed confused and caught off-guard by such a possibility and simply dropped the mic on it.