Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker Menu

Exelon may shut down nuclear plants in profit struggle

Started by Marlin, Feb 07, 2014, 08:30

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Fermi2


GLW

time to warm up your EMC/EMT spreadsheets,....

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

HydroDave63

Quote from: Marlin on Feb 07, 2014, 08:30
Exelon may shut down nuclear plants in profit struggle


http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-02-06/business/chi-exelon-earnings-20140206_1_nuclear-plants-coal-fired-power-plants-power-prices

Interestingly, the article shows that revenues and profits are mildly increasing. The impetus for this ominous warning would seem more likely that someone, somewhere WANTS nuclear to be 'twisting in the wind', so to speak  >:(

SloGlo

aye am reeding the as a squeeze play on the grid to the greenies. threatening to close quad cities n clinton will bring out strong union voices to the potus and administration.
quando omni flunkus moritati

dubble eye, dubble yew, dubble aye!

dew the best ya kin, wit watt ya have, ware yinze are!

RRhoads

They didnt mention them by name in the all hands meeting today but the discussion was 2 more plants will probably be shutdown prematurely in 2014. :o

HydroDave63

I believe you, but it looks more like greed than necessity...right now this is tall cotton for energy markets, especially if you have inexpensive baseload that isn't dependent on nat gas or wind

Electricity prices in lower right column

http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/prices.cfm

hiddencamper

Exelon hedges their power sales 3 years in advance, so they aren't seeing very much if the high power prices over the last month.

There are plants in exelon that are negative even after looking 10+ years out using market models, and the models exelon has had for the last few years keep turning for the worst for the few units getting hit the hardest. Yes Exelon as a whole is making profits, but the individual plants in question have negative asset value and are in the red for several years or more. If you can see a long term path to profitability, it makes sense to lose money on an asset for a few years, but if you can't even see that, it becomes hard to justify keeping the plants open.

Anyways. That's my what i know

cjaj123

Would Exelon continue to hire as normal if it were possible they would shut QC and Clinton down? I have not worked for Exelon but am currently trying to get in as an Equipment Operator. I plan on asking, at my interview, questions specific to the plant as I want to be sure I am choosing the best location since I live within commuting distance of two plants. It is so costly for Exelon to hire and train new operators I wouldn't think they would do so if shutdowns were coming , would they? I don't have the insider knowledge that many of you here hold. Based on all the information I have seen on here over the last year while I have been doing my best to research the position, plant and company, it seems likely that you guys know whats going on or At least have a more educated assessment than I.

GoHawks

Quote from: cjaj123 on Feb 13, 2014, 11:15
Would Exelon continue to hire as normal if it were possible they would shut QC and Clinton down? I have not worked for Exelon but am currently trying to get in as an Equipment Operator. I plan on asking, at my interview, questions specific to the plant as I want to be sure I am choosing the best location since I live within commuting distance of two plants. It is so costly for Exelon to hire and train new operators I wouldn't think they would do so if shutdowns were coming , would they? I don't have the insider knowledge that many of you here hold. Based on all the information I have seen on here over the last year while I have been doing my best to research the position, plant and company, it seems likely that you guys know whats going on or At least have a more educated assessment than I.

Have you been asked to test and interview?  You are worrying over nothing if you haven't

Fermi2

Yes they will hire as normal right up till they make the decision.

cjaj123

Thank you for the responses...and yes I have tested and been invited to interview.

Nukeictech

Kewaunee was still hiring operators pretty much right up to the last moment.  I believe one individual started about 1week before the announcement.  Overall I would have to say that Dominion has treated everyone that was at the plant at the time of the announcement very well, and still does for those who are still there.

cjaj123

Why are utilities not trying to sell the public on the idea of nuclear being an important component to reducing the carbon emissions of the U.S.? I have seen a few articles recently but as a whole even growing up in Northern Illinois, surrounded by nuclear plants, I have rarely heard anything about them in terms of the power they supply or greenhouse gases. I'm sure this is discussed on here somewhere so I'll go searching.

Fermi2

Doesn't matter what you can sell of the price is too high.
Funny thing is those utilities that run heating boilers put out more carbon emissions than a dirt burner with scrubbers and an Fgd

cjaj123

I have to research it. I have no idea what types of generation are truly the best for the environment. You can find articles claiming supporting each of them and just as many articles condemning each of them.

Higgs

Quote from: cjaj123 on Feb 19, 2014, 11:58
Why are utilities not trying to sell the public on the idea of nuclear being an important component to reducing the carbon emissions of the U.S.? I have seen a few articles recently but as a whole even growing up in Northern Illinois, surrounded by nuclear plants, I have rarely heard anything about them in terms of the power they supply or greenhouse gases. I'm sure this is discussed on here somewhere so I'll go searching.

Do have 6-8 billion to build a new nuclear plant? Or are you expecting utilities to do it out of the goodness of their hearts?

It is not economically feasible to start new construction today.

Justin
"How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." - Ted Nugent


Fermi2

That doesn't make it feasible as those loans are not available to every utility. It also proves the nuke industry cannot be economical without government subsidy.
For a better look witness Watts Bar. 2 billion over and 3 years behind

GLW

Quote from: Rennhack on Jun 03, 2012, 02:17
...The Nuclear Renaissance isn't over, its on pause.

Quote from: GLW on Jun 03, 2012, 08:44
Two biggest hurdles/liabiities for commercial nukes;

NIMBY - Northeast new construction? - not likely in my lifetime,...
           Southeast? - Lots of potential,...
           Southwest? - Texas yes, everybody else no,...
           Upper Midwest? - not likely in my lifetime,...
           Great Central Prarie? - not likely in my lifetime,...
           Rockies - no
           Pacific coast - no

Long Term Waste Storage - Without a long term central repository, or state by state long term repositories (my preference), liability of spent fuel/GTCC materials will be the ugly football that keeps getting kicked down the road from corporate fleets to corporate mergers to that notion in the back of everybodies head that high level waste liability is "too big to fail" and the government of the people will get stuck with it eventually anyways,.....................

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

Marlin

Quote from: Broadzilla on Feb 19, 2014, 09:16
That doesn't make it feasible as those loans are not available to every utility. It also proves the nuke industry cannot be economical without government subsidy.
For a better look witness Watts Bar. 2 billion over and 3 years behind

A loan guarantee is a subsidy? There is still interest in nuclear it is just very schizophrenic.

HalfHazzard

Quote from: Marlin on Feb 19, 2014, 09:30
A loan guarantee is a subsidy? There is still interest in nuclear it is just very schizophrenic.

If the loan doesn't get paid back, it becomes a subsidy real quick.

It's schizophrenic with the rise and fall of fossil prices.  I wish there would be a renaissance, but it always seems to be 5 years away.

Marlin

Quote from: HalfHazzard on Feb 20, 2014, 07:23
If the loan doesn't get paid back, it becomes a subsidy real quick.

  True but unlike solar and wind nuclear has never failed to pay a debt or cost the government anything through guaranteed loans or PAAA.



Quote from: HalfHazzard on Feb 20, 2014, 07:23
It's schizophrenic with the rise and fall of fossil prices.  I wish there would be a renaissance, but it always seems to be 5 years away.


   Add continued subsidies to green energy that may or may not work like the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating Station, similar designed facilities are being canceled.


http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2014/02/19/largest-solar-thermal-plant-completed-ivanpah

Higgs

"How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." - Ted Nugent

Fermi2

Yes it is a subsidy. My utility is planning a new fossil unit and guess what? No loan guarantee from the DOE. We have to foot the old fashioned way with a rate case,
Without loan guarantees and Price Anderson nukes wouldn't make it.


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2025 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?