Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Talk about Bartlett honeypot

Author Topic: Talk about Bartlett  (Read 421751 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 19000
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #250 on: Mar 28, 2005, 08:08 »
I personnally have not had good experiences with Bartlett, but to be honest compared to the many companies that I did work for (that no longer exist) Bartlett was better run, with the exception of NUMANCO and we know that story. I have to agree with everyone else that it is difficult to gauge average when the only large company doing HP staff augmentation is Bartlett.

radgal

  • Guest
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #251 on: Mar 29, 2005, 10:56 »
How about comparing them to any company, not just contract worker supplier?  I've had other jobs besides HP contract work and Bartlett is definetely above average out there.

Offline PWHoppe

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 823
  • Karma: 2024
  • Gender: Male
  • CONFIRMED!: The dumbest man on the planet
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #252 on: Mar 29, 2005, 11:00 »
Very good point radgal, "house mouse" jobs are not always what they seem to be. I think it would be a good source of discussion for those who have worked both sides of the fence.
If a chicken and a half can lay an egg and a half in a day and a half, how many days will it take a grasshopper with a rubber foot to kick a hole in a tin can?

Forum rules..http://www.nukeworker.co

Offline Rennhack

  • Forum Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 9074
  • Karma: 4686
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #253 on: Mar 29, 2005, 11:45 »
How can Big Blue be "Above Average" when they dominate the market? Wouldn't that make them "Average" by definition? I evaluated them in comparison to companies that are now gone (or swallowed).

They only dominate a small portion of the market.  Specifically the "United States Commercial Power Plant Health Physics Technician". 

1. They don't dominate ALL professions at commercial power plants
2. They don't dominate ANY profession at non-commercial nuclear facilities like DOE.
     (The last number I heard was 5% of RCT's at DOE sites, and growing.)
3.  And they have almost no presence outside of the USA.

« Last Edit: Mar 29, 2005, 01:07 by RDTroja »

Atomic_Punk

  • Guest
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #254 on: Mar 30, 2005, 01:57 »
Back in the early '90s, I had a lot of problems that stemmed from a SC (who was total waste of oxygen).
Once he was extracted from the situation, no more problems. One's that weren't solved anyway.
I've got to say, Bartlett's treated me very well, for the most part. :)

Offline Rennhack

  • Forum Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 9074
  • Karma: 4686
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #255 on: Jun 30, 2005, 06:33 »
What does this have to do with the price of tea in china?  Brue has nothing to do with the company anymore.

I think your question should be it's own topic in the "Expose yourself" area.

feathersmoke

  • Guest
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #256 on: Jun 30, 2005, 04:40 »
Quote
i thought butch was a a$$ at first but then i gained respect for him and i know i would work for him again

LOL........at first?  Ever heard the expression:  1st impression is usally correct...I'm afraid in this case it is true...

Offline Rennhack

  • Forum Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 9074
  • Karma: 4686
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #257 on: Jul 01, 2005, 07:54 »
"What pile are you in?" is not about the company, it is about "what pile they are in".  That is what the 'expose yourself' area is for, talking about ones self.

This thread is about the company. 

As you see, it was never moved.

Offline Mike McFarlin

  • Safety/Chemist/Health Physicist
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1538
  • Karma: 2145
  • Gender: Male
  • Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #258 on: Apr 13, 2006, 09:22 »
Seems like every job there is a situation that arise that cause hard feelings. The communications between employer and employee need to be cleared before the job ever starts. My 2 cents worth... 
"Duty is the sublimest word in our language. Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less." General Robert E. Lee, C.S.A.

RNN

  • Guest
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #259 on: Apr 13, 2006, 08:10 »
Well I can only comment on the last few years about working for Bartlett when they took over the contract at my site.

1. They pay weekly
2. Never late with the paycheck
3. If I have had an issue with a paycheck the home office has fixed it/told me I'm wrong in a very timely manner

So from those 3 points I'm happy with working for Bartlett

RNN

Offline Dream Tar Heel

  • Dulce Periculum
  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Karma: 214
  • Gender: Male
  • Never Happy Until Happy With Yourself!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #260 on: Apr 13, 2006, 09:15 »
Average, I guess................espicall y since they seem to be a major part of my future at the moment.

Come on Atlantic! 8)
I NEVER KNEW LOVE, I JUST KNOW THE SOUND IT MAKES WHEN IT LIES!

Nuclear Hooker

  • Guest
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #261 on: May 23, 2006, 11:54 »
Hey there Industry Event,
Haven't talked to you or the other TVA bunch in quite a while. 
I feel compelled to say some things about this wage issue.  Yeah it was great to get a 4 dollar per hour rate hike.....back in 2002....but then in 05 they re-did the contract, and guess what they kept it the same for locals, and dropped it for travelers BUT started paying Per Diem.....WHOOPIE!!!!!!  So, in essance we haven't gotten a raise in over 4 years.  I really wanted to go there and work this fall, but it's Financial Suicide.  I can BRING home more on 60's at the northern plants than I can working 72's at the house.  By about 250 more per week.  And that's just on 60's NOT 72's.
I'm glad ya'll get per diem for the SGRP....but is that really Good Enough?????  What happens after the outage??  Back to the same B.S. rules to try to make a decent living while being away from family and friends. 
Watts Bar is one of my FAVORITE places to work, but it's not worth giving up that amount of $$.

The old saying is true "You get what you pay for"  and Watts Bar will see the "BLUE" light special that they will be  given....if you smell what I'm steppin in!!!

Later,
Hooker
« Last Edit: May 23, 2006, 04:29 by Rennhack »

Surveyors_mato

  • Guest
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #262 on: May 24, 2006, 10:30 »
Hooker said;Watts Bar is one of my FAVORITE places to work, but it's not worth giving up that amount of $$.

The old saying is true "You get what you pay for"  and Watts Bar will see the "BLUE" light special that they will be  given....if you smell what I'm steppin in!!!

  Sad too is that for local people with no other means of looking after the kids. TVA has us by the short ones and they know it. We can't just go on the road and leave the kids at home ....and many of us don't have family to take up the slack.what do you do?

Offline RRhoads

  • Heavy User
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
  • Karma: 334
  • Gender: Male
  • it was like like that when i got here!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #263 on: May 24, 2006, 10:43 »
There are ALWAYS options...if you choose not to excercise them...that's your choice.
Peach Bottom treats all contractors (locals & road techs) like crap & wonder why they have a low returnee rate...was my home plant for a long time & only worked there once!
Whether it's low pay or crappy conditions you ALWAYS have the option of not working there or in that system.

Surveyors_mato

  • Guest
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #264 on: May 24, 2006, 11:20 »
You know, it just occured to me that Watts Bar isn't the problem...........Tva isn't the problem...............We don't work for them we work for Big Blue.and before.Numanco...........so Maybe the problem is Bartlett is the one who doesn't care........I mean they get paid and it doesn't matter to the at all if techs are happy as long as they work.....come on..........It is about the money....our's and Bartletts.....So as always if a person doesn't want to work a place, no problem for B.....someone will...............What would things really be like if Our company stepped up to the plate and said...............'Hey plant's..........We need more money for our techs.?................Whoa that's a new thought......okay, okay, I'm awake.............dang! what a dream I jusyt had. :P

Offline nukedog

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 60
  • Karma: 45
  • Look at the head on that thing!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #265 on: May 25, 2006, 07:47 »
Bartlett is going to do what ever the Company wants. That's good business! Take it or leave it that's the way it is! If you are tried of working for the MAN then start your own business. nobody is stopping you. Hey Bruce did it! Quite whinning about the situation and do something about it. After all you said the locals have to work the plants, I say no they don't. In fact if the plants had only the locals to count on they could staff. :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

Offline Dream Tar Heel

  • Dulce Periculum
  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Karma: 214
  • Gender: Male
  • Never Happy Until Happy With Yourself!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #266 on: May 25, 2006, 01:09 »
"After all you said the locals have to work the plants, I say no they don't. In fact if the plants had only the locals to count on they could staff".

You are correct, the locals DON'T have to work these plants like WBN. but some do because it is what they want to do.

So I dont see the problem, if you want to be there, go, shut up do the job and be happy.

If you dont want to be there, your not, so what are you slobbering about.

The only difference in these 2 statments, if you we told one thing by WBN or Big Blue, and then they changed the rules, then you have all the right to holler all the way home, if that is where you chose to go. Cause they really dont care about you, your fooling yourself if you think they do.

So again, I hope all the travelers stay home and then the locals can work a 7 month SGRP!

And WBN could not staff thier outage with just locals, Locals dont get per diem >60 miles, they dont have that many hillbillies around there!
I NEVER KNEW LOVE, I JUST KNOW THE SOUND IT MAKES WHEN IT LIES!

Offline TENN-1

  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 97
  • Karma: 295
  • Gender: Male
  • Finished the 5 year plan in only 34!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #267 on: May 25, 2006, 05:50 »
Easy on the Hillbilly stuff, there's no reason to drag my family into this chicken fight.
Things come to those who wait, but usually it's stuff left over from those who hustle!

Offline Dream Tar Heel

  • Dulce Periculum
  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Karma: 214
  • Gender: Male
  • Never Happy Until Happy With Yourself!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #268 on: May 26, 2006, 05:19 »
Sorry about that Jed.
I NEVER KNEW LOVE, I JUST KNOW THE SOUND IT MAKES WHEN IT LIES!

Offline Eric_Bartlett

  • Heavy User
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
  • Karma: 956
  • Gender: Male
  • I was liberal as a youth then I had to pay taxes..
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #269 on: May 26, 2006, 04:01 »
What would things really be like if Our company stepped up to the plate and said...............'Hey plant's..........We need more money for our techs.?................Whoa that's a new thought......okay, okay, I'm awake.............dang! what a dream I jusyt had. :P
Once again someone had to write something that would catch my attention and drag me into the same old converstation thats been go'n on since the dawn of the road tech industry...
I've said it before and i'll say it again - the more we pay, the more we can bill, the more we can bill, the more we make, the more we make, the more we can pay...and so on, on so on - it doesnt serve either the technician or the vendor company (in my case Bartlett) to pay low.  Every season we hit our clients up on pay increases, diem increases, bonuses, travel increases, etc - on the one hand some take our advice and raise the incentives, on the other hand others look to see what thier "neighbors" are paying and say "why should we go higher, our neighbor is pay'n X amount so will we."  So forgive me if i take offense to the comment "...if Our company stepped up to the plate..." Wether or not you want to acknowledge it we, Bartlett, have stepped up to the plate in the past, are doing so now and will be doing so in the future.  There ya go, you got me on another rant.  ;)

Have a safe holiday weekend,
Eric Bartlett
The opinions & views expressed by me are mine and mine alone and may not reflect those of the company.

Offline Dream Tar Heel

  • Dulce Periculum
  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Karma: 214
  • Gender: Male
  • Never Happy Until Happy With Yourself!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #270 on: May 26, 2006, 11:31 »
Question Eric, if you have a moment. Isn't it very easy to say you (as a company) are doing everything you can, every season............when in truth, while you have 90% of the Nuclear Power Plant contracts, and no reasonable competition, you really dont have to do anything, just say that you are.

And since this is the WBN thread, here is a WBN question. How does a junior HP who lives 73 miles from WBN get classified as a local?

I understand everything can't be perfect, but we are all people doing a job to take care of our families. And go to work when we are supposed to, do the job we are expected to do (sometimes better than the seniors in charge of us), and yet the same rules dont apply to everyone, equally? Very confusing, espically when people like yourself say you are doing everything you can, but someone still finds a way to single out and squeeze a "little guy".

And I am not talking about myself, I have hair.

Just my thoughts..... 8)

Thanks, and Have a Wonderful Weekend also!
I NEVER KNEW LOVE, I JUST KNOW THE SOUND IT MAKES WHEN IT LIES!

Offline Dream Tar Heel

  • Dulce Periculum
  • Moderate User
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Karma: 214
  • Gender: Male
  • Never Happy Until Happy With Yourself!
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #271 on: May 27, 2006, 09:50 »
The following quote is not based in reality, as Atlantic has taken a bigger bite then you must think.

[/quote]

It's based in the reality that Big Blue is the dominant contractor and Atlantic is just snacking on what Big Blue is letting slip through their fingers. Atlantic is no where close to Numanco status, but I do hope they get there, everyone needs an arch rival.

So in closing, I want that "big bite" to be of the choking status, not the snacking kind. 8)
I NEVER KNEW LOVE, I JUST KNOW THE SOUND IT MAKES WHEN IT LIES!

illegalsmile

  • Guest
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #272 on: May 28, 2006, 08:03 »
My understanding (or misunderstanding) of the economics of the contracts is that they are mostly awarded to the low bidder. Also, the companies make their money as per centage of the total billing. Therefore, the more they can bill, the more they make...... and the more they can pay. Competition for the contracts means "who can bid lowest and still staff?" That is not going to be a good thing for us field mice. Whether it's Bartlett, Atlantic or Roadscum Nuclear, LLC, the lowest bidder is most likely to get the contract and most likely to pay the least. The only ones who will benefit from this competition are the utilities.

Offline SloGlo

  • meter reader
  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 5834
  • Karma: 2646
  • Gender: Male
  • trust me, i'm an hp
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #273 on: May 28, 2006, 10:43 »
now eye no ware alla da power whiners are...  der are daze i thank doz who look out fer me.  yinz hafa good thyme.  eye yam sure i'll link up wit ya sooer err later.
quando omni flunkus moritati

dubble eye, dubble yew, dubble aye!

dew the best ya kin, wit watt ya have, ware yinze are!

Hefty

  • Guest
Re: Bartlett
« Reply #274 on: May 29, 2006, 02:50 »
pssssst.....Eric......
You never answered Dream Tarheel's question: Why would Bartlett, while they're "doing everything they can, in every season", not allow a junior the same benefits (per diem) you allow everyone else?  Or is it true that Jrs don't eat as much, drive as much, or spend as much on food and lodging as seniors?  Have you guys ever thought that you may need those juniors one day as the seniors dwindle away? 

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2025 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?