The FERC Order No. 1000 final rules are being foisted upon the transmission end of the business.
The final rules do call for enhancing reliability and the robust capability of the nation's grid (gotta love those wordsaladsmiths at FERC).
Does anyone see an opportunity for baseload NPP's to niche out a more competitive position in these final rules or do the same losses apply as implemented after the Order No. 890 rules took effect?
Just casting about for a peer check on this one,.... 
With a little luck, the Florida PSC's objections
http://www.thefloridacurrent.com/article.cfm?id=33575313 and rehearing will either a) get Order 1000 significantly rewritten, or b) get Order 1000 partly overturned in US District Court or c) SCOTUS hammers Order 1000 and FERC in general. FERC has lately been an overflowing jailhouse toilet of Orders lately, including 764 that not only lets 'variable resources' miss schedules (thus making your ISO/RTO cover the shortfall with reserves) but now schedules have to be done in 15 minute intervals so the 'variable resources' (aka wind-powered eagle shredders
http://news.yahoo.com/wind-power-us-extends-permit-eagle-deaths-145931345--finance.html ) can stay within a smaller imbalance penalty zone while they miss schedule.
Back to Odor 1000....the problem there is how the costs are allocated. If I'm a well-known political billionaire (or up and coming junior partner at the same hottub party) whose electric companies are putting up eagle shredders (built by a large politically connected manufacturer) and I want to put up lots of new high-voltage AC transmission, it is much nicer to say that my new transmission won't just carry MY generation, but also my neighbor's baseload generation (parallel circuit flows of electricity) so it is now a Regional product;therefore, whether my neighboring utilities can actually schedule over my line or not, I should get FERC ('Fundamentally Escaping Realistic Conclusions' or insert your own acronym here) to MAKE my neighbors pay for part of my new "WhiteElephantExpress" transmission project. I think that is what is called "value investing" by some folks, and redistribution by others. Oh yes, then like the night cook at Denny's garnishing the Grand Slam with some wilted parsley, FERC sprinkles the 'enhancing reliability', 'robust capability', 'unjust and unreasonable', 'unduly discriminatory' etc. on this crap sandwich.
The new large lines basically go from new generation to urban load centers, thus bypassing older baseload gen. This is meant to be another box of nails in baseload's coffin.
Other than that I have no opinion...but if I did, I'd need a charge code.
