In the US, on the energy side... no, on the waste side...yes thanks to half life. On the new builds, I give WB2 a 50/50. If they finish, make it through HFT and power ascension test to 100%, without an unforeseen equipment failure problem from long-term hold, they should be OK mechanically... but. The AP1000s right now make me nervous. The whole nuke industry has bet the future on their success. Everyone is watching and waiting. Everybody knows the deal, what will be final cost and on what final schedule. And I see history repeating from the '80s; they can't seem to get their arms around the QA problem. That was the source of all the "walk aways" in the '80s, and is the largest player in final cost and schedule. It is a tough nut to crack, due mainly to no nuke new construction for 30 years. The whole work force is just not used to working under what may be seen as a "paper" problem. It is a paper problem that can pull your plug. I think they are grasping the magnitude, but don't know how to fix it (or are afraid to take the required action). What needs to be done will kill the cost and schedule.