Help
|
Contact Us
NukeWorker Menu
Plants that do *not* NRC-license their STAs
NukeWorker Forum
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Login
Register
NukeWorker Forum
»
Career Path
»
Training, Tests & Education
»
Plants that do *not* NRC-license their STAs
« previous
next »
Send this topic
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Plants that do *not* NRC-license their STAs (Read 5319 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
not_rocket_science
Guest
Plants that do *not* NRC-license their STAs
«
on:
Feb 07, 2006, 11:13 »
Anyone know of any examples?
«
Last Edit: Feb 07, 2006, 11:20 by not rocket science
»
Logged
JnyMac
Guest
Re: Plants that do *not* NRC-license their STAs
«
Reply #1 on:
Feb 19, 2006, 07:17 »
Palo Verde does not license their STAs. They sit through Generic Fundamentals. They pass our in-plant Audit and then sit through systems. Then they do STA specific training and some STA specific simulator stuff. They go on-shift.
Logged
Send this topic
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
NukeWorker Forum
»
Career Path
»
Training, Tests & Education
»
Plants that do *not* NRC-license their STAs
NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of
NukeWorker.com ™
, LLC © 1996-2025 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement
|
Terms of Use
|
Code of Conduct
|
Spam Policy
|
Advertising Info
|
Contact Us
|
Forum Rules
|
Password Problem?